Geriatric Oncology

Author(s):  
Margot A. Gosney
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 442-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supriya G. Mohile ◽  
William Dale ◽  
Mark R. Somerfield ◽  
Arti Hurria

Author(s):  
Erika Ramsdale ◽  
Eric Snyder ◽  
Eva Culakova ◽  
Huiwen Xu ◽  
Adam Dziorny ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leana Chien ◽  
Elsa Roberts ◽  
Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis ◽  
Vani Katheria ◽  
Sherry Hite ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. S53
Author(s):  
A. Bellieni ◽  
G.F. Colloca ◽  
B. Di Capua ◽  
D. Fusco ◽  
M.A. Gambacorta ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00442
Author(s):  
William Dale ◽  
Grant R. Williams ◽  
Amy R. MacKenzie ◽  
Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis ◽  
Ronald J. Maggiore ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: For patients with cancer who are older than 65 years, the 2018 ASCO Guideline recommends geriatric assessment (GA) be performed. However, there are limited data on providers’ practices using GA. Therefore, ASCO’s Geriatric Oncology Task Force conducted a survey of providers to assess practice patterns and barriers to GA. METHODS: Cancer providers treating adult patients including those ≥ 65 years completed an online survey. Questions included those asking about awareness of ASCO’s Geriatric Oncology Guideline (2018), use of validated GA tools, and perceived barriers to using GA. Descriptive statistics and statistical comparisons between those aware of the Guideline and those who were not were conducted. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Participants (N = 1,277) responded between April 5 and June 5, 2019. Approximately half (53%) reported awareness of the Guideline. The most frequently used GA tools, among those aware of the Guideline and those who were not, assessed functional status (69% v 50%; P < .001) and falls (62% v 45%; P < .001). Remaining tools were used < 50% of the time, including tools assessing weight loss, comorbidities, cognition, life expectancy, chemotherapy toxicity, mood, and noncancer mortality risk. GA use was two to four times higher among those who are aware of the Guideline. The most frequent barriers for those who reported being Guideline aware were lack of resources, specifically time (81.7%) and staff (77.0%). In comparison, those who were unaware of the Guideline most often reported the following barriers: lack of knowledge or training (78.4%), lack of awareness about tools (75.2%), and uncertainty about use of tools (75.0%). CONCLUSION: Among providers caring for older adults, 52% were aware of the ASCO Guideline. Some domains were assessed frequently (eg, function, falls), whereas other domains were assessed rarely (eg, mood, cognition). Guideline awareness was associated with two to four times increased use of GA and differing perceived barriers. Interventions facilitating Guideline-consistent implementation will require various strategies to change behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document