scholarly journals How Is Geriatric Assessment Used in Clinical Practice for Older Adults With Cancer? A Survey of Cancer Providers by the American Society of Clinical Oncology

2020 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00442
Author(s):  
William Dale ◽  
Grant R. Williams ◽  
Amy R. MacKenzie ◽  
Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis ◽  
Ronald J. Maggiore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Geriatric Oncology ◽  
Perceived Barriers ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Change Behavior ◽  
American Society

PURPOSE: For patients with cancer who are older than 65 years, the 2018 ASCO Guideline recommends geriatric assessment (GA) be performed. However, there are limited data on providers’ practices using GA. Therefore, ASCO’s Geriatric Oncology Task Force conducted a survey of providers to assess practice patterns and barriers to GA. METHODS: Cancer providers treating adult patients including those ≥ 65 years completed an online survey. Questions included those asking about awareness of ASCO’s Geriatric Oncology Guideline (2018), use of validated GA tools, and perceived barriers to using GA. Descriptive statistics and statistical comparisons between those aware of the Guideline and those who were not were conducted. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Participants (N = 1,277) responded between April 5 and June 5, 2019. Approximately half (53%) reported awareness of the Guideline. The most frequently used GA tools, among those aware of the Guideline and those who were not, assessed functional status (69% v 50%; P < .001) and falls (62% v 45%; P < .001). Remaining tools were used < 50% of the time, including tools assessing weight loss, comorbidities, cognition, life expectancy, chemotherapy toxicity, mood, and noncancer mortality risk. GA use was two to four times higher among those who are aware of the Guideline. The most frequent barriers for those who reported being Guideline aware were lack of resources, specifically time (81.7%) and staff (77.0%). In comparison, those who were unaware of the Guideline most often reported the following barriers: lack of knowledge or training (78.4%), lack of awareness about tools (75.2%), and uncertainty about use of tools (75.0%). CONCLUSION: Among providers caring for older adults, 52% were aware of the ASCO Guideline. Some domains were assessed frequently (eg, function, falls), whereas other domains were assessed rarely (eg, mood, cognition). Guideline awareness was associated with two to four times increased use of GA and differing perceived barriers. Interventions facilitating Guideline-consistent implementation will require various strategies to change behavior.

Use of the geriatric assessment in clinical practice in Mexico: A survey of cancer providers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24013-e24013
Author(s):  
Haydee Cristina Verduzco-Aguirre ◽  
Laura Margarita Bolano Guerra ◽  
Hector Martínez-Said ◽  
Gregorio Quintero Beulo ◽  
Eva Culakova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Geriatric Oncology ◽  
Public Institution ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Qualified Personnel ◽  
Medical Oncologists ◽  
Oncology Providers

e24013 Background: Despite the growing burden of cancer in older adults in Mexico, it is unknown how many cancer care providers in Mexico use information obtained through a geriatric assessment (GA) and/or geriatric oncology principles in their everyday clinical practice. Methods: We administered a cross-sectional survey to oncology providers in Mexico via the Mexican Society of Oncology mailing list (n = 1240). The survey included questions on demographics, awareness about geriatric oncology principles, and the use of the GA and other geriatric clinical tools. The primary outcome was to estimate the proportion of providers using GA tools through the question: “For your patients ≥65 years, do you perform a multidimensional geriatric assessment using validated tools?”. We hypothesized that ≤10% of respondents would give a positive answer. We used descriptive statistics and X2 tests to compare groups of respondents. Results: We obtained 196 answers (response rate 15.8%). 121 (62%) respondents were male; median age 42. 98 (50%) were surgical oncologists, 59 (30%) medical oncologists, and 38 (19%) radiation oncologists. Median time in practice was 8 years, with 39% practicing in Mexico City. A third had their practice at a public institution, 26% at a private institution, and 38% in both. The proportion of patients aged 65-79 and ≥80 seen on an average clinic day by the respondents was 30% and 10%, respectively. 121 (62%) reported having a geriatrician available at their practice site. 37 respondents (19%) reported using validated GA tools to evaluate older adults with cancer in their practice. The proportion of respondents who evaluated each GA domain is shown in Table 1. Male respondents (p=0.03), medical oncologists (p<0.01), and those with a less busy practice (≤10 patients/day) (p=0.01) were more likely to use validated tools to perform a GA. Regarding barriers for implementing GA, 37% reported lack of time, 49% lack of qualified personnel, 44% lack of knowledge of geriatric tools, 6% patient unwillingness to undergo a GA, and 8% prohibitive cost. Only 17 (9%) thought that information obtained through a GA would not lead to practice changes. Conclusions: According to our survey, the proportion of Mexican oncology providers using validated tools to perform a GA is 19%, which is higher than expected. Some GA domains, such as comorbidity and functional status, were commonly assessed, while others, such as fall history, were seldom evaluated. Common barriers for GA implementation were lack of qualified personnel and of knowledge about geriatric tools. We plan to further explore these barriers and potential facilitators through focused interviews in order to guide future interventions.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals What Every Oncologist Should Know About Geriatric Assessment for Older Patients With Cancer: Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology Position Paper

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kah Poh Loh ◽  
Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis ◽  
Tina Hsu ◽  
Nienke A. de Glas ◽  
Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Geriatric Oncology ◽  
Treatment Decisions ◽  
Position Paper ◽  
Illustrative Case ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Detailed Evaluation ◽  
Oncology Practice

Aging is a heterogeneous process. Most newly diagnosed cancers occur in older adults, and it is important to understand a patient’s underlying health status when making treatment decisions. A geriatric assessment provides a detailed evaluation of medical, psychosocial, and functional problems in older patients with cancer. Specifically, it can identify areas of vulnerability, predict survival and toxicity, assist in clinical treatment decisions, and guide interventions in routine oncology practice; however, the uptake is hampered by limitations in both time and resources, as well as by a lack of expert interpretation. In this review, we describe the utility of geriatric assessment by using an illustrative case and provide a practical approach to geriatric assessment in oncology.

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for Older Patients With Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (14) ◽  
pp. 1824-1831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martine Extermann ◽  
Arti Hurria
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Psychological State ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Oncology Patient ◽  
Patients With Cancer

Purpose During the last decade, oncologists and geriatricians have begun to work together to integrate the principles of geriatrics into oncology care. The increasing use of a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is one example of this effort. A CGA includes an evaluation of an older individual's functional status, comorbid medical conditions, cognition, nutritional status, psychological state, and social support; and a review of the patient's medications. This article discusses recent advances on the use of a CGA in older patients with cancer. Methods In this article, we provide an update on the studies that address the domains of a geriatric assessment applied to the oncology patient, review the results of the first studies evaluating the use of a CGA in developing interventions to improve the care of older adults with cancer, and discuss future research directions. Results The evidence from recent studies demonstrates that a CGA can predict morbidity and mortality in older patients with cancer. Accumulating data show the benefits of incorporating a CGA in the evaluation of older patients with cancer. Prospective trials evaluating the utility of a CGA to guide interventions to improve the quality of cancer care in older adults are justified. Conclusion Growing evidence demonstrates that the variables examined in a CGA can predict morbidity and mortality in older patients with cancer, and uncover problems relevant to cancer care that would otherwise go unrecognized.

scholarly journals Addressing Tobacco Use in Patients With Cancer: A Survey of American Society of Clinical Oncology Members

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 258-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham W. Warren ◽  
James R. Marshall ◽  
K. Michael Cummings ◽  
Benjamin A. Toll ◽  
Ellen R. Gritz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Oncology ◽  
Tobacco Use ◽  
Tobacco Cessation ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Initial Visit ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
American Society

Among ASCO members who responded to an online survey about their practice patterns regarding tobacco, most believe that tobacco cessation is important and frequently assess tobacco at initial visit, but few provide cessation support.

scholarly journals International Society of Geriatric Oncology Consensus on Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients With Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (24) ◽  
pp. 2595-2603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Wildiers ◽  
Pieter Heeren ◽  
Martine Puts ◽  
Eva Topinkova ◽  
Maryska L.G. Janssen-Heijnen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
International Society ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Geriatric Oncology ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Consensus Statements ◽  
Oncology Treatment ◽  
Oncology Practice

Purpose To update the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) 2005 recommendations on geriatric assessment (GA) in older patients with cancer. Methods SIOG composed a panel with expertise in geriatric oncology to develop consensus statements after literature review of key evidence on the following topics: rationale for performing GA; findings from a GA performed in geriatric oncology patients; ability of GA to predict oncology treatment–related complications; association between GA findings and overall survival (OS); impact of GA findings on oncology treatment decisions; composition of a GA, including domains and tools; and methods for implementing GA in clinical care. Results GA can be valuable in oncology practice for following reasons: detection of impairment not identified in routine history or physical examination, ability to predict severe treatment-related toxicity, ability to predict OS in a variety of tumors and treatment settings, and ability to influence treatment choice and intensity. The panel recommended that the following domains be evaluated in a GA: functional status, comorbidity, cognition, mental health status, fatigue, social status and support, nutrition, and presence of geriatric syndromes. Although several combinations of tools and various models are available for implementation of GA in oncology practice, the expert panel could not endorse one over another. Conclusion There is mounting data regarding the utility of GA in oncology practice; however, additional research is needed to continue to strengthen the evidence base.

Approach to the Geriatric Patient

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tia Kostas ◽  
Mark Simone ◽  
James L Rudolph
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Functional Dependence ◽  
Geriatric Care ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Older Individuals ◽  
Geriatric Population ◽  
General Internists

As of 2012, over one in eight Americans is over the age of 65, and this number is rising, particularly in the 85+ age group. This segment of the population has a rate of hospitalization three times higher than that for persons of all ages. General internists and family medicine physicians provide a large portion of care for this age group and should therefore be comfortable using a comprehensive approach to geriatric assessment. This review describes general considerations regarding geriatric care, including the process of taking a functional history and clinical implications of geriatric care. The geriatric assessment process is discussed in terms of physical, cognitive, social, and medical domains. The benefits of geriatric assessment in primary care, specialty care, and hospitalized patients are described. Tables outline activities of daily living, sensory changes with aging, major causes of visual impairment in the geriatric population, major neurocognitive disorder diagnostic criteria, medications to avoid or use with caution based on Beers criteria and Screening Tool of Older individuals’ Potentially inappropriate Prescriptions criteria, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force–recommended services relevant to older adults, and vaccinations in older adults. Figures illustrate the key vulnerabilities of older adults; outcomes linked to functional dependence; common disorders associated with cognitive concerns; domains of cognition and examples of impairment in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition; the social and medical domains of geriatric assessment; barriers to medication adherence in older patients; and resources for medication appropriateness in older adults. This review contains 8 highly rendered figures, 8 tables, 110 references, and 5 MCQs.

Approach to the Geriatric Patient

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tia Kostas ◽  
Mark Simone ◽  
James L Rudolph
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Functional Dependence ◽  
Geriatric Care ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Older Individuals ◽  
Geriatric Population ◽  
General Internists

As of 2012, over one in eight Americans is over the age of 65, and this number is rising, particularly in the 85+ age group. This segment of the population has a rate of hospitalization three times higher than that for persons of all ages. General internists and family medicine physicians provide a large portion of care for this age group and should therefore be comfortable using a comprehensive approach to geriatric assessment. This review describes general considerations regarding geriatric care, including the process of taking a functional history and clinical implications of geriatric care. The geriatric assessment process is discussed in terms of physical, cognitive, social, and medical domains. The benefits of geriatric assessment in primary care, specialty care, and hospitalized patients are described. Tables outline activities of daily living, sensory changes with aging, major causes of visual impairment in the geriatric population, major neurocognitive disorder diagnostic criteria, medications to avoid or use with caution based on Beers criteria and Screening Tool of Older individuals’ Potentially inappropriate Prescriptions criteria, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force–recommended services relevant to older adults, and vaccinations in older adults. Figures illustrate the key vulnerabilities of older adults; outcomes linked to functional dependence; common disorders associated with cognitive concerns; domains of cognition and examples of impairment in theDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition; the social and medical domains of geriatric assessment; barriers to medication adherence in older patients; and resources for medication appropriateness in older adults. This review contains 8 highly rendered figures, 8 tables, 110 references, and 5 MCQs.

Approach to the Geriatric Patient

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tia Kostas ◽  
Mark Simone ◽  
James L Rudolph
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Functional Dependence ◽  
Geriatric Care ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Older Individuals ◽  
Geriatric Population ◽  
General Internists

As of 2012, over one in eight Americans is over the age of 65, and this number is rising, particularly in the 85+ age group. This segment of the population has a rate of hospitalization three times higher than that for persons of all ages. General internists and family medicine physicians provide a large portion of care for this age group and should therefore be comfortable using a comprehensive approach to geriatric assessment. This review describes general considerations regarding geriatric care, including the process of taking a functional history and clinical implications of geriatric care. The geriatric assessment process is discussed in terms of physical, cognitive, social, and medical domains. The benefits of geriatric assessment in primary care, specialty care, and hospitalized patients are described. Tables outline activities of daily living, sensory changes with aging, major causes of visual impairment in the geriatric population, major neurocognitive disorder diagnostic criteria, medications to avoid or use with caution based on Beers criteria and Screening Tool of Older individuals’ Potentially inappropriate Prescriptions criteria, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force–recommended services relevant to older adults, and vaccinations in older adults. Figures illustrate the key vulnerabilities of older adults; outcomes linked to functional dependence; common disorders associated with cognitive concerns; domains of cognition and examples of impairment in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition; the social and medical domains of geriatric assessment; barriers to medication adherence in older patients; and resources for medication appropriateness in older adults. This review contains 8 highly rendered figures, 8 tables, 110 references, and 5 MCQs.

scholarly journals Hematology-Oncology Fellows’ Training in Geriatrics and Geriatric Oncology: Findings From an American Society of Clinical Oncology–Sponsored National Survey

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. e900-e908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald J. Maggiore ◽  
William Dale ◽  
Arti Hurria ◽  
Heidi D. Klepin ◽  
Andrew Chapman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Geriatric Oncology ◽  
The United States ◽  
First Year ◽  
Clinical Experiences ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Electronic Survey ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
American Society

Purpose: Older adults compose the majority of patients with cancer in the United States; however, it is unclear how well geriatrics or geriatric oncology training is being incorporated into hematology-oncology (hem-onc) fellowships. Methods: A convenience sample of hem-onc fellows completed a (written or electronic) survey assessing their education, clinical experiences, and perceived proficiency in geriatric oncology during training; knowledge base in geriatric oncology; confidence in managing older adults with cancer; and general attitudes toward geriatric oncology principles. Results: Forty-five percent of respondents (N = 138) were female, 67% were based in the United States, and most (60%) were past their first year of training. Most fellows rated geriatric oncology as important or very important (84%); however, only 25% reported having access to a geriatric oncology clinic and more than one half (53%) reported no lectures in geriatric oncology. Fellows reported fewer educational experiences in geriatric oncology than in nongeriatric oncology. For example, among procedure-based activities, 12% learned how to perform a geriatric assessment but 78% learned how to perform a bone marrow biopsy ( P < .05). Of those completing the knowledge-based items, 41% were able to identify correctly the predictors of chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer. Conclusion: Despite the prevalence of cancer in older adults, hem-onc fellows report limited education in or exposure to geriatric oncology. The high value fellows place on geriatric oncology suggests that they would be receptive to additional training in this area.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document