Neonatal Respiratory Control and Apnea of Prematurity

2008 ◽  
pp. 449-460
Author(s):  
Oded Mesner ◽  
Juliann M. Di Fiore ◽  
Richard J. Martin
2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. e2.30-e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Robertson ◽  
Adriece Al Rifai ◽  
Jenny Machell

AimApnoea of prematurity is common in babies born at less than 34 weeks gestation due to immature respiratory control systems.1–4 The current mainstay of treatment in the UK is a methylxanthine – caffeine – which acts as a respiratory stimulant. Our local guideline follows the Caffeine for Apnea of Prematurity (CAP) study with a single loading dose followed by 24-hourly maintenance doses, given either intravenously or orally1.In August 2012 a UK licenced oral caffeine product was launched, however various safety concerns were raised over this product and its presentation which led to delays in use on our Neonatal Units (NNUs). Unfortunately the single patient, single use product would also lead to a massive increase in our oral caffeine spend – with the cost of an average dose of oral caffeine rising from just £0.13 to £24.41. This equates to an annual cost increase of approximately £53,140 – around a 150-fold increase from the previous £360 per annum. We have therefore considered and implemented a new initiative to avoid unacceptable cost pressures within the neonatal service.MethodsConsideration was made to administering caffeine doses in ‘rounds’ on NNU to allow doses for more than one patient from a single bottle.However, there were a number of issues to overcome – the oral caffeine rounds would require the product to be used outside of its licence. We also needed to be sure that limiting the timing of caffeine administration to standard times on the NNUs – provisionally twice daily rounds at 10:00 and 22:00 – would not affect its therapeutic and potentially toxic effects in this vulnerable patient group.Savings as a result of this initiative were to be tracked for one year post implementation.ResultsTotal savings in the first 10 months following implementation were £15,945 – a projected saving of £19 134 per annum. There have been no reports of any adverse clinical outcomes related to timing of caffeine doses.ConclusionGiven the success of this initiative we plan to move towards a once daily oral caffeine round on our NNUs at 10:00. The majority of babies currently receive their dose at this time but formal implementation will lead to further cost savings. A morning oral caffeine round will also help to minimise the at least theoretical risk of the CNS stimulant effects and cardiac effects of caffeine, principally tachycardia, disrupting a baby’s sleep pattern. There is some evidence of this in the literature although these effects are more common at supratherapeutic levels.ReferencesNottingham Neonatal Service. Clinical guideline B7 – Use of caffeine in apnoea of prematurityMay 2016.Schmidt B, Roberts RS, Davis P, et al. Caffeine for Apnea of Prematurity Trial Group. Caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity. N Engl J Med2006;354(20):2112–21.Henderson-Smart DJ, Steer PA. Caffeine versus theophylline for apnea in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews2010:Issue 1.Art No:CD000273.Henderson-Smart DJ, De Paoli AG. Methylxanthine treatment for apnea in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews2010:Issue 12.Art. No:CD0001.


2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 17-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Theobald ◽  
Carol Botwinski ◽  
Stephanie Albanna ◽  
Paula Mc William

Apnea is a disorder of respiratory control commonly seen in premature infants. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain apnea, and many clinical conditions have been associated with its development. Apnea of prematurity is seen in infants less than 37 weeks gestation, with the incidence increasing as gestational age decreases. Expert and consistent nursing care is essential for management of premature infants with apnea. This article reviews the differential diagnosis, pathogenesis, and implications for care of apnea of prematurity.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 969-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Hodgman
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cláudia Regina Hentges ◽  
Renata Rostirola Guedes ◽  
Rita C. Silveira ◽  
Renato S. Procianoy

1984 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 536-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Sherrill ◽  
G. D. Swanson

The ventilatory response to changes in alveolar (arterial) CO2 is widely used as an index of respiratory control behavior. Methods for estimating these response slopes should incorporate the possibility that there may be errors in both the independent (partial pressure of CO2) and dependent (ventilation) variables. In a recent paper Daubenspeck and Ogden (J. Appl. Physiol. Respirat. Environ. Exercise Physiol. 45:823–829, 1978) have suggested problems inherent in the traditional technique of reduced major axis and have suggested a more contemporary technique of directional statistics. We have previously analyzed both techniques and developed a method to overcome the problems of reduced major axis and problems inherent in the use of directional statistics. Under the assumption of a bivariate normal distribution, we demonstrate that our slope estimate is similar to the maximum likelihood estimate proposed by Mardia et al. (J. Appl. Physiol.: Respirat. Environ. Exercise Physiol. 54: 309–313, 1983) for this problem. In addition, we demonstrate a bootstrap statistical approach when the distributions are not normally distributed. These concepts are illustrated using O2-CO2 interaction data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document