Adverse Childhood Experiences: Translating Knowledge into Identification of Children at Risk for Poor Outcomes

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariane Marie-Mitchell ◽  
Thomas G. O’Connor
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 1221-1235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine A. LaBrenz ◽  
Lisa S. Panisch ◽  
Jennifer Lawson ◽  
Amber L. Borcyk ◽  
Beth Gerlach ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. VV-D-19-00158
Author(s):  
James E. Barnett ◽  
Tasha R. Howe

Child maltreatment and other adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) often cooccur and are related to negative socioemotional outcomes; however, limited research differentiates how maltreatment versus other ACEs predict such outcomes. These efforts are necessary to determine whether cumulative ACE screening efforts best predict those at risk for poor outcomes. We examined cumulative childhood ACEs, cumulative maltreatment subtypes, and adult attachment quality in 379 young and middle-aged adults. This sample enabled comparison between emerging adults and older adults who have navigated additional developmental tasks that may counteract the effects of early ACEs. More ACEs and maltreatment experiences predicted insecure anxious, avoidant, and fearful attachment styles; however, maltreatment failed to predict unique variance in attachment quality beyond other ACEs. Results suggest that maltreatment may be best categorized as part of a general cumulative risk profile predicting poor socioemotional outcomes. Findings support burgeoning trends in medical and social service settings assessing ACEs using simple dichotomous screening tools to identify those requiring intervention and support services.


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon G. Scott ◽  
Nadine J. Burke ◽  
Carl F. Weems ◽  
Julia L. Hellman ◽  
Victor G. Carrión

Author(s):  
Trevor Spratt ◽  
Mary Kennedy

Abstract Research has demonstrated conclusively that the experience of adversities in childhood increases the risks for poor outcomes in the domains of physical and mental health and economic and social circumstances across the life course. This has produced a wave of interest in the effects of Adverse Childhood Experiences internationally, with developments in policy across the UK nations reflective of this. The translation of such research and policy development has witnessed the growing dominance of the ‘toxic stress model’ as underpinning the early signalling of troubles in children. Such signals are further conceptualised as the presence of ‘trauma’. It is upon these conceptual pillars that therapeutically orientated services are being built. In this article, we describe these developments, offering as they do, challenges to short-term interventions as well as providing opportunities for social workers to appropriate the developing knowledge base so as to inform more effective ways of working.


2020 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 104816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa S. Panisch ◽  
Catherine A. LaBrenz ◽  
Jennifer Lawson ◽  
Beth Gerlach ◽  
Patrick S. Tennant ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Leanne Whiteside-Mansell ◽  
Lorraine McKelvey ◽  
Jennifer Saccente ◽  
James P. Selig

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have long-term health consequences. Young children in the southern part of the United States (US) are at greater risk than children in other parts of the US. This study assessed preschool children ACEs using a family-friendly tool, the Family Map (FMI), and compared children living in rural/urban areas while examining the potential moderation of race. The FMI–ACE score was examined as a total and two sub-scores. We found that race did not moderate the FMI–ACE score but that Black children (Cohen’s d = 0.52) and children in urban and large rural areas were at highest risk (Cohen’s d = 0.38). However, the subscale FMI–ACEs parenting risk was moderated by race such as that Black children were less at risk in rural areas than urban (Cohen’s d = 0.62). For FMI–ACEs environmental risk, race moderated risk such that Black children were most at risk in large rural areas but less so in small rural areas (Cohen’s d = 0.21). Hispanic children were most at risk in small rural areas and least in large rural environments. Findings from this study suggest that targeting the most at-risk children for interventions should consider the context including race and location.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document