Cover crop evapotranspiration under semi-arid conditions using FAO dual crop coefficient method with water stress compensation

2007 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 85-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Bodner ◽  
W. Loiskandl ◽  
H.-P. Kaul
OENO One ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 975-983
Author(s):  
Javier Abad ◽  
Marín Diana ◽  
Santesteban L. Gonzaga ◽  
Cibriáin José Félix ◽  
Sagüés Ana

This study aims to evaluate the interest of using an under-vine cover crop as a sustainable management tool replacing herbicides or tillage to control weeds, evaluating its effects on yield and berry parameters in a semi-arid climate. The performance of Trifolium fragiferum as an under-vine cover crop was evaluated in 2018 and 2019 in a Merlot vineyard in Traibuenas (Navarra, Spain). This trial showed that the soil under the vines was covered by 80 % of the cover crop in August 2018 and 100 % in Aug 2019, with clover (T. fragiferum) comprising around 26 % and 70 % of the cover crop surface, respectively. The presence of the cover crop only reduced the number of shoots in the second year, although both years there was an increment in water stress. Neither yield, cluster weight nor berry weight were affected by the presence of the under-vine cover crop. Similarly, no changes in grape composition were observed. The use of T. fragiferum-like cover crops under the vine allows for better control of weeds, provided a good installation is achieved. In the first two years, this cover crop reduced vegetative growth and increased water deficit slightly. However, no changes in yield and grape composition were observed.In a context of herbicide suppression and search for sustainable management, under-vine clover cover crops constitute a viable alternative in semi-arid regions provided drip irrigation can be applied. 


1994 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 431-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. I. Orphanos ◽  
C. Metochis

SUMMARYGrain barley was grown either continually or in rotation with fallow in a 12-year experiment. Annual rainfall ranged from 120 to 297 mm. As the water requirement of the crop is 240 mm, growth in most seasons occurred under water stress. The amount of water conserved under fallow was only significant (75–100 mm) in three of the 12 years and only once did the water conserved increase barley yield in the following year. The total grain yield over the experimental period was twice as high in the barley–barley sequence as in the barley–fallow sequence.Cultiuo continuo de cebada o después de barbecho


2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 3493-3506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgos Papadavid ◽  
Diofantos G. Hadjimitsis ◽  
Leonidas Toulios ◽  
Silas Michaelides

2019 ◽  
Vol 213 ◽  
pp. 922-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kishan Singh Rawat ◽  
Sudhir Kumar Singh ◽  
Anju Bala ◽  
Szilárd Szabó

2015 ◽  
Vol 197 ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duran Yavuz ◽  
Nurcan Yavuz ◽  
Musa Seymen ◽  
Önder Türkmen

2018 ◽  
Vol 09 (07) ◽  
pp. 873-887
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ishfaq ◽  
Usman Zulfiqar ◽  
Muhammad Ahmad ◽  
Ch Basit Mustafa ◽  
Ali Hamed ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-65
Author(s):  
Vivek Sharma ◽  
Abhijit Rai

HighlightsDeficit irrigation negatively affected dry bean yield and yield components.Excess irrigation increased crop ETc but not dry bean yield.Soil moisture fluctuation was greater in the top 0.3 m of the soil profile compared to deeper depths.Crop water production function had a slope of 18.9 kg ha-1 mm-1 and threshold crop evapotranspiration of 171 mm.Dry bean crop was found to be sensitive to water stress (yield response factor Ky = 1.94).Abstract. Under changing climate conditions and declining water resources, understanding crop response to water stress is critical for effective irrigation management. The objectives of this study were to quantify dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., cv. Othello) soil moisture dynamics, crop evapotranspiration (ETc), and yield response factor and to develop dry bean irrigation and crop water production functions (IWPF and CWPF). Five irrigation treatments, i.e., full irrigation (FIT), 75% FIT, 50% FIT, 25% FIT, and 125% FIT, were evaluated using a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications for three years (2017, 2018, and 2019) in the arid to semi-arid intermountain region of Powell, Wyoming. The results showed a significant influence of irrigation on dry bean soil moisture dynamics and ETc. The dry bean crop showed a greater soil moisture fluctuation in the top 0.3 m of the soil profile compared to 0.6 m and at 0.9 m. ETc ranged from 187 to 438 mm, from 190 to 409 mm, and from 217 to 398 mm in the 2017, 2018, and 2019 growing seasons, respectively. A positive two-segment relationship was observed between dry bean seed yield and cumulative irrigation water applied. The average cumulative seasonal irrigation of 310 mm resulted in maximum seed yield. For all three years, the seed yield increased linearly with ETc. Combining the data from the three years resulted in a CWPF with a slope of 18.9 kg ha-1 mm-1 and an offset of 171 mm of ETc (i.e., the ETc required for crop establishment before any seed yield is produced, or threshold ETc). Moreover, the dry bean crop was found to be sensitive to water stress (Ky = 1.94). These results indicated that under the typical semi-arid to arid climate conditions of the intermountain region of Wyoming, deficit irrigation of dry bean may not be a viable strategy because the yield loss outweighs water-saving benefits. Keywords: Dry bean, Crop evapotranspiration, Crop production function, Irrigation water production function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document