Certoparin versus unfractionated heparin to prevent venous thromboembolic events in patients hospitalized because of heart failure: A subgroup analysis of the randomized, controlled CERTIFY study

2011 ◽  
Vol 161 (2) ◽  
pp. 322-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Tebbe ◽  
Sebastian M. Schellong ◽  
Sylvia Haas ◽  
Horst Eberhard Gerlach ◽  
Claudia Abletshauser ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 2055-2062
Author(s):  
Soravis Osataphan ◽  
Rushad Patell ◽  
Thita Chiasakul ◽  
Alok A. Khorana ◽  
Jeffrey I. Zwicker

Abstract Hospitalized medically ill patients with cancer are at increased risk of both venous thromboembolism and bleeding. The safety and efficacy of extended thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer are unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature using of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases to identify cancer subgroups enrolled in randomized controlled trials evaluating extended thromboprophylaxis following hospitalization. The primary outcomes were symptomatic and incidental venous thromboembolic events and hemorrhage (major hemorrhage and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding). Four randomized controlled trials reported the outcomes of extended thromboprophylaxis in 3655 medically ill patients with active or history of cancer. The rates of venous thromboembolic events were similar between the extended-duration and standard-duration groups (odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.18; I2 = 0%). However, major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred significantly more frequently in the extended-duration thromboprophylaxis group (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.33-3.35; I2 = 8%). Extended thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medically ill patients with cancer was not associated with a reduced rate of venous thromboembolic events but was associated with increased risk of hemorrhage. This study protocol was registered on PROSPERO as #CRD42020209333.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Haas ◽  
Sebastian M Schellong ◽  
Ulrich Tebbe ◽  
Horst-Eberhard Gerlach ◽  
Rupert Bauersachs ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4892-4892
Author(s):  
Lamya Garabet ◽  
Pal André Holme ◽  
Bernadette Darne ◽  
Abderrahim Khelif ◽  
Tor Henrik Anderson Tvedt ◽  
...  

Introduction Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a disease characterized by low platelet count and increased risk of bleeding. However, there has been an increased focus on the risk of thromboembolism particularly venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with ITP itself and with some of its therapies. Epidemiological studies have shown a doubling in the risk of VTE in ITP patients as compared to the general population. VTE has been reported with various ITP therapies including splenectomy, steroids, IVIG and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs). In long-term studies on TPO-RAs, arterial and venous thrombosis occurred in 6% of treated patients. Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody directed against CD-20 on the B-cells is widely used as a treatment for ITP. It yields a response rate of 60% and is generally well-tolerated. However, to our knowledge VTE events following treatment with rituximab for ITP have not been reported. Aims We report thromboembolic adverse events encountered in 2 multicenter, randomized controlled trials (RCT) for adult ITP patients treated with rituximab: 1) Rituximab as second-line treatment for adult ITP (the RITP trial)(Ghanima et al, Lancet 2015; 385) and 2) The Rituximab Maintenance Therapy in ITP (The PROLONG Trial; NCT03010202) Methods RITP was a multicenter, randomized placebo-controlled trial in which adult patients with ITP unresponsive to corticosteroid and platelet count <30x10⁹/L were enrolled. Of the 112 ITP patients, 55 patients were randomly assigned to 4 weekly infusions of 375 mg/m2 rituximab and the remaining received placebo. Concurrent treatment with corticosteroids only was allowed during the study. The steroid dose had to be tapered to the lowest dose that kept the platelet count >20x10⁹/L. PROLONG is an ongoing multicenter, two-phase RCT. In the first phase, patients with ITP, who fail to achieve an adequate response to corticosteroids (prednisolone or dexamethasone) during the first year after diagnosis are randomized to receive rituximab 1000 mg twice with 15 days apart with or without dexamethasone 20 mg for 4 days starting with rituximab. In the secondphase, responding patients will be randomized at 24 weeks to maintenance therapy with 2 rituximab or placebo infusions separated by 24 weeks. Results Four venous thromboembolic events were reported in 4 patients: 2 of 55 patients who received rituximab in the RITP trial and 2 (one received dexamethasone+rituximab) of 52 patients included so far in the first phase of the PROLONG trial, which results in a VTE rate of 3.7% in the rituximab treated patients. No thromboembolic events were encountered in the placebo arm of the RITP study (n=54 patients, matched on age). Median time from treatment to event was 40.5 weeks, with 2 events occurring 7-14 weeks after the administration of the first dose of rituximab. Median platelet count at the time of VTE was 188x109/L. Characteristics of the 4 patients are shown in the table; none was splenectomized or received thrombopoietic agents before the VTE event. No arterial thromboembolic events were reported in the 2 trials. Conclusion The rate of VTE following treatment with rituximab in these 2 studies seems to be higher than what is expected in an adult ITP population and the general population (Norgaard et al. Br J Haematol. 2016;174). However, based on these results we cannot determine whether the venous thromboembolic events were just incidental events or triggered by the treatment and/or the normalization of platelet count or the presence of risk factors for VTE as old age and immobilization. Table Disclosures Tvedt: Ablynx, alexion and novartis: Consultancy. Michel:Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy. Ghanima:Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer/BMS: Research Funding.


Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 878
Author(s):  
Yesha H. Parekh ◽  
Nicole J. Altomare ◽  
Erin P. McDonnell ◽  
Martin J. Blaser ◽  
Payal D. Parikh

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 leading to COVID-19 induces hyperinflammatory and hypercoagulable states, resulting in arterial and venous thromboembolic events. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been well reported in COVID-19 patients. While most DVTs occur in a lower extremity, involvement of the upper extremity is uncommon. In this report, we describe the first reported patient with an upper extremity DVT recurrence secondary to COVID-19 infection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document