Variation in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II cases between virtual 3D models and traditional plaster study models

2005 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 262
Author(s):  
Josh Whetten
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
3D Models ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Planning Decisions

Orthodontic Treatment Planning by General Dental Practitioners

1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Parfitt ◽  
W. P. Rock
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Dental Practitioners ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

A group of 30 general dental practitioners were asked to plan treatment for a series of 10 Class II division 1 malocclusions of graded severity. The results were assessed against a gold standard provided by three consultants. Only 14 per cent of practitioner treatment plans agreed with the gold standard and agreement was worst for those cases requiring the use of headgear. When consultants and General Dental Practitioners (GDPs) were asked whether a case should be referred for advice before the GDP began treatment, 64 per cent of GDP decisions agreed with those of the consultants. On 13 per cent of occasions, however, the GDP would have initiated incorrect treatment without seeking consultant advice.

scholarly journals Influence of Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs on Orthodontic Treatment Planning of Class II Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 296-302
Author(s):  
Irina Stupar ◽  
Enver Yetkiner ◽  
Daniel Wiedemeier ◽  
Thomas Attin ◽  
Rengin Attin
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Fixed Functional Appliance ◽  
Routine Manner ◽  
Knowing That ◽  
Signed Rank ◽  
Minor Influence ◽  
University Of Zurich

Background:Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs (LCR) are a common decision-making aid in orthodontic treatment planning and are routinely used in clinical practice. The aim of this present study was to test the null hypothesis that LCR evaluation does not alter specific components of orthodontic treatment planning in Class II patients.Materials and Methods:Records of 75 patients, who had been treated at the Department of Orthodontics, Centre of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich comprised the study material. Inclusion criteria were: (1) adolescents between the age of 12-15, (2) permanent dentition with Class II buccal segment relationship (3) absence of craniofacial and dento-alveolar malformations. Fifteen orthodontists from the dental faculties of Istanbul University, Istanbul and Ege University, Izmir filled out Likert-type linear scale questionnaires without knowing that they would repeat the same procedure with and without LCRs at two different time points. Equivalence and clinical relevance were assessed using (%95 CI) Wilcoxon signed rank tests.Results:Extraction decision did not differ between groups (p=0.68). Preference of functional appliance use (p=0.006) and inter-maxillary fixed functional appliance (p=0.043) was different among groups.Conclusion:LCR evaluation has minor influence on treatment planning procedure of Class II patients. It might be beneficial to consider its prescription not in a routine manner but as a supplementary tool considering possible reduction of radiation exposure.

Consistency of orthodontic treatment planning decisions

1999 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Lee ◽  
T. MacFarlane ◽  
K. O'Brien
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Planning Decisions

scholarly journals Variation of orthodontic treatment decision-making based on dental model type: A systematic review

2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 501-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Pachêco-Pereira ◽  
Graziela De Luca Canto ◽  
Paul W. Major ◽  
Carlos Flores-Mir
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
Plaster Models

ABSTRACTObjective: To determine in which clinical scenarios digital models are valid as replacements for plaster models during orthodontic treatment decision-making process and treatment planning.Materials and Methods: An attempt to identify all pertinent published information was made. Retained articles were those where a decision-making process leading to differential orthodontic treatment plans based on either method were compared. The search was tailored for PubMed and adapted for EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, LILACS, and Web of Science. A partial grey literature search was conducted through Google Scholar. References lists of the included articles were screened for potential relevant studies. The methodology of selected studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS).Results: Only two studies were finally selected for the qualitative and quantitative synthesis. QUADAS results scores from selected studies ranged from 61% to 83% of 11 items evaluated. In one, the overall treatment plan regarding orthognathic surgery for Class II malocclusion changed in 13% to 22% of the cases. In the other one, 6% of the orthodontic treatment plans changed.Conclusion: Digital models could be used to replace plaster models in Class II malocclusion treatment planning.

scholarly journals Pattern of Malocclusion and Treatment Need in Orthodontic Patients: An Institution-based Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-140
Author(s):  
Lalita G Nanjannawar ◽  
Jiwan Asha Agrawal ◽  
Manish Agrawal
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Baseline Data ◽  
Proper Treatment ◽  
Treatment Need ◽  
Sex Type ◽  
Chief Complaints ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
Assessment Of Need

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to analyze the malocclusion pattern among patients who visited Department of Orthodontics of BVU Dental College and Hospital, Sangli (Maharashtra) as a baseline data for proper treatment planning, teaching and further research. Materials and methods This study was conducted on 125 patients who attended the orthodontic department from December 2008 to June 2010. Information regarding age, sex, type of malocclusion, dentofacial patterns and dentofacial characteristics was obtained from patients records. Orthodontic treatment need was assessed using DHC component of IOTN. Results The results of the study showed that the patients age ranged from 10 to 33 years with mean age of 16 years 9 months (+ 3.92). There were 91 (72.8%) females and 34 (28.2%) males. Chief complaints of majority of patients were ‘upper front teeth forward’ and ‘irregular teeth’. The commonest type of malocclusion was Angle's class II which was seen in 60 (48%) of patients. There was an increased overjet in 81% of subjects. Statistically significant association was found between skeletal and Angle's classes (p < 0.01). Assessment of need for orthodontic treatment using the DHC component of IOTN showed that 59 (47.2%) were in great need of orthodontic treatment and 53 (42.4%) had definite need of treatment. Conclusion The results give a detailed pattern of malocclusion in orthodontic patients and may provide a baseline data for research and planning orthodontic services. How to cite this article Nanjannawar L, Agrawal JA, Agrawal M. Pattern of Malocclusion and Treatment Need in Orthodontic Patients: An Institution-based Study. World J Dent 2012;3(2):136-140.

scholarly journals Orthodontic Management of Bilaterally Impacted Maxillary Canines

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 212-215
Author(s):  
Ahmed Ali Alfawzan ◽  
Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Female Patient ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Medical Science ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Proper Diagnosis

Background: Proper diagnosis and treatment planning are the first steps in management of bilateral impacted maxillary canines (BIMC). Case Presentation: A 14 years old Saudi female patient with Class II subdivision right molar relationship and BIMC managed by comprehensive orthodontic treatment. Conclusion: A well-balanced occlusion by orthodontic management of the case has been done. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.20(1) 2021 p.212-215

Perbedaan Analisis Sefalometri Skeletal Sebelum dan Sesudah Perawatan Alat Myofunctional pada Pasien Maloklusi Dentoskeletal Kelas II Divisi I dalam Masa Pertumbuhan dengan Metode Steiner

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nugroho Ahmad Riyadi
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
T Test ◽  
Analytic Study ◽  
Statistic Analysis ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Normal Occlusion ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

The aim of orthodontics treatment is normalization of teeth position in three planes, using various orthodontics appliance to reach the chepalometric standar and normal occlusion. Orthodontic treatment for dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion in growing patients using myofunctional appliance may correct anteroposterior planes of mandibula. This study was a descriptive retrospective analytic study to look at the success of Orthodontic treatment for dentoskeletal class II division 1 in growing patients with myofunctional appliance using chepalometrics analysis Steiner value. The sample used in this study is chepalogram radiographic from patient with dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion in growing patients before and after using myofunctional appliance in PPDGS orthodontics Clinic of Padjadjaran University. Statistic analysis were performed with pair t-test and Wilcoxon. Based on this study, it is concluded that orthodontic treatment with myofunctional appliance such as activator and twin block in growing patient with dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion shows significant changes and compatibility with the normal criteria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document