The differences of root morphology and root length between different types of impacted maxillary central incisors: A retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guosheng Wu ◽  
Shengxi He ◽  
Jun Chi ◽  
Hao Sun ◽  
Huihuang Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Morphology ◽  
Root Length ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Different Types

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Capabilities of Different Types of Cone-Beam Tomography in an Experimental Study of Root Canals of Teeth Filled with High-Density Materials (part 2)

2021 ◽  
pp. 51-61
Author(s):  
A. Yu. Vasil'ev ◽  
V. V. Petrovskaya ◽  
E. A. Nichipor ◽  
V. G. Alpatova ◽  
N. N. Potrakhov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Experimental Study ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Comparative Assessment ◽  
High Density ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Cone Beam Tomography

During the course of this experimental study tomograms of extracted teeth were analyzed before and after filling the root canals with an endodontic material and fragments of broken metal instruments for root canal treatment. During the first stage of the experiment, untreated extracted teeth were scanned using conebeam computed tomography and microfocus cone-beam computed tomography. A comparative assessment of capabilities of the two methods of cone-beam computed tomography based on examination of untreated root canals was carried out. The second part of the study is dedicated to visualization of root canals that contain foreign high-density materials.

Effect of root length over alveolar bone on fracture resistance: Detection by cone-beam computed tomography

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Fumi Mizuhashi ◽  
Ichiro Ogura ◽  
Yoshihiro Sugawara ◽  
Makoto Oohashi ◽  
Hirokazu Sekiguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Length ◽  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Resistance Detection

scholarly journals Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in defining spatial relationships between third molar roots and inferior alveolar nerve

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 454-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Pippi ◽  
Marcello Santoro ◽  
Ferdinando D'Ambrosio
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Morphology ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Root Surface ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Spatial Relationships ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
The Third

ABSTRACT Objective: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been proposed in surgical planning of lower third molar extraction. The aim of the present study was to assess the reliability of CBCT in defining third molar root morphology and its spatial relationships with the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). Materials and Methods: Intraoperative and radiographic variables of 74 lower third molars were retrospectively analyzed. Intraoperative variables included IAN exposure, number of roots, root morphology of extracted third molars, and presence/absence of IAN impression on the root surface. Radiographic variables included presence/absence of the cortex separating IAN from the third molar roots on CBCT examination, number of roots and root morphology on both orthopantomography (OPG) and CBCT. The statistical association between variables was evaluated using the Fisher's exact test. Results: In all cases of intraoperative IAN exposure, the cortex appeared discontinuous on CBCT images. All cases, in which the cortical bone was continuous on CBCT images, showed no association with nerve exposure. In all cases in which nerve impression was identified on the root surface, the IAN cortex showed interruptions on CBCT images. No nerve impression was identified in any of the cases, in which the cortex appeared continuous on CBCT images. CBCT also highlighted accessory roots and apical anomalies/curvatures, not visible on the OPG. Conclusions: CBCT seems to provide reliable and accurate information about the third molar root morphology and its relationship with the IAN.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Apical Root Morphology of Maxillary Incisors using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Brazilian Subpopulation: A Cross-sectional Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiane Martins Rodrigues Bernardes ◽  
Luiz Eduardo Gregoris Rabelo ◽  
Cyntia Rodrigues DE Araújo Estrela ◽  
Orlando Aguirre Guedes ◽  
Brunno Santos DE Freitas Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Morphology ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
P Value ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Maxillary Incisors

Introduction: The prevalence of Apical Root Resorption (ARR) after orthodontic treatment is high. It is associated with several factors, such as tooth group, type and duration of treatment, applied force and root morphology. Aim: To evaluate the apical root morphology of maxillary incisors in a Brazilian subpopulation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective and cross-sectional study, 400 maxillary incisors from 167 patients registered in the data base of Dental Radiology Clinics between January 2012 and April 2017 were analysed. The apical root configuration was verified by navigating 0.1 mm/0.1 mm, in the three planes, axial, coronal, and sagittal sections on CBCT images, from the root canal entrance to the apical foramen, as well as from the apical direction to the crown. The standard reference for apical root form corresponded to the long axis of the tooth. The root forms and their frequency were characterised according to the classification proposed by Levander and Malmgren (1988). The qualitative variables were analysed by the Chi-square test. The level of significance was p-value <0.05. Results: A total of 400 maxillary anterior teeth (central and lateral incisors; n=200 each) from 167 patients (101 women; mean age was 41.8±16.20 years) were analysed. The most common apical root form presented in the central incisors was the blunt root {99 (49.5%)}, followed by pipette-shaped root {69 (34.5%)}. The less frequent was the short root {13 (6.5%)} (p-value <0.001). In the lateral incisors, the highest frequency presented was lacerated root {111 (55.5%)}, followed by blunt root {47 (23.5%)}, and pipette- shaped root {37 (18.5%)} (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: Maxillary central incisors had a higher frequency of rhomboid (blunt) root morphology, while lateral incisors had a higher frequency of curved (lacerated) root form.

scholarly journals Assessment of Mesial Root Morphology and Frequency of MB2 Canals in Maxillary Molars using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 1333-1337 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Abarca ◽  
B Gómez ◽  
C Zaror ◽  
H Monardes ◽  
L Bustos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Morphology ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Maxillary Molars

scholarly journals Estimating the location of the center of resistance of canines

2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feifei Jiang ◽  
Katherine Kula ◽  
Jie Chen
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Contact Surface ◽  
Root Length ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Average Difference ◽  
Fe Method ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Center Of Resistance

ABSTRACT Objective:  To develop a method to quickly estimate the location of center of resistance (CR) in mesial-distal (MD) and buccal-lingual (BL) directions from the tooth's image. Materials and Methods:  The maxillary cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 18 patients were used. Finite element (FE) models of the canines and their surrounding tissues were built based on their CBCT scans to calculate the locations of CR. Root length, centroid of the contact surface (CCS), and centroid of projection of the contact surface (CPCS) were also obtained from the images. The CCS and CPCS locations were projected on the tooth's long axis, which were represented as percentages of the root length measured from the root's apex. Results:  Using the FE results as the standards, the errors of using CCS or CPCS to estimate CR were calculated. The average location of CR calculated using the FE method was 60.2% measured from the root’s apex in the MD direction and 58.4% in the BL direction. The location of the CCS was 60.9%. The difference in CR was 0.7% in the MD direction and 2.5% in the BL direction. The location of CPCS was 60.2% in the MD direction and 59.1% in the BL direction, which resulted in a 0.1% and 0.8% difference with the reference CR, respectively. The average difference of CR in the MD and BL directions was small but statistically significant (P &lt; .05). Conclusion:  The locations of the CR of a human canine in the MD and BL directions can be estimated by finding the CPCSs in those directions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document