Laparoscopic surgery vs laparotomy for early stage endometrial cancer: long-term data of a randomized controlled trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 200 (3) ◽  
pp. 296.e1-296.e9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fulvio Zullo ◽  
Stefano Palomba ◽  
Angela Falbo ◽  
Tiziana Russo ◽  
Rita Mocciaro ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-125
Author(s):  
Ayako Nozaki ◽  
Tetsuji Odagiri ◽  
Maki Kanno ◽  
Kenrokuro Mitsube ◽  
Yu Furuta ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 215 (5) ◽  
pp. 588.e1-588.e7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minna M. Mäenpää ◽  
Kari Nieminen ◽  
Eija I. Tomás ◽  
Marita Laurila ◽  
Tiina H. Luukkaala ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA3516-LBA3516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Åsmund Avdem Fretland ◽  
Davit Aghayan ◽  
Bjørn Edwin ◽  

LBA3516 Background: Despite the recent worldwide dissemination of laparoscopic liver surgery, the long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic and open liver surgery have never been compared in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: OSLO-COMET was a randomized controlled trial recruiting patients from Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. The primary outcome of the trial was postoperative morbidity within 30 days. Patients with radically resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to undergo laparoscopic or open parenchyma-sparing liver resection. Overall survival was a predefined secondary endpoint for the trial. Survival data for the treatment arms will be compared using a log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier plots. Results: From February 2012 to January 2016 a total of 294 patients were screened and 280 (95%) patients were randomized to laparoscopic (n = 133) or open (n = 147) surgery. The primary endpoint demonstrated a significant reduction in morbidity from 31% in the open group to 19% in the laparoscopic group. Other secondary outcomes demonstrated no difference between the groups, including the rate of R0 resection and the width of resection margins, while laparoscopic surgery was found to be cost-effective. Patients received perioperative chemotherapy following Norwegian guidelines. The final patient was operated on Feb 28, 2016, and a survival analysis was performed on March 14, 2019, with a minimum of 36 months follow-up. By ITT analysis (n = 280), median overall survival (OS) was 80 months (95% CI 52-108) in the laparoscopic surgery group and 81 months (95% CI 42-120) in the open surgery group, p=0.91. By modified ITT, (only patients that had R0/R1 resection), median recurrence free survival (RFS) was 19 months (10-27) in the laparoscopic group and 16 months (11-21) in the open group, p = 0.96. Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery in patients with colorectal liver metastases was associated with rates of OS and RFS similar to open surgery. Clinical trial information: NCT01516710.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 1722-1726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josefa Marcos-Sanmartín ◽  
José Antonio López Fernández ◽  
José Sánchez-Payá ◽  
Óscar Cruz Piñero-Sánchez ◽  
María José Román-Sánchez ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the long-term safety, disease-free survival, and recurrence rate of total laparoscopic hysterectomy using uterine manipulator and abdominal hysterectomy in the surgical treatment in early-stage endometrial cancer.Study DesignThis was a cohort study of 147 patients with clinical endometrial cancer (laparoscopic surgery group, 77 women; laparotomy group, 70 women). Data were evaluated and analyzed by intention-to-treat principle, and survival data of stage I endometrial cancer (129 patients; 66 from laparoscopic surgery group and 60 from laparotomy group) were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier curves.ResultsAfter a follow-up period of 60 months for both laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy groups, no significant difference in the cumulative recurrence rates (7.4% and 13.1%, P = 0.091) and overall survival (97.1% and 95.1%, P = 0.592) was detected between both groups of stage I endometrial cancer. Conversion to laparotomy occurred in 10.4% (8/77) of the laparoscopic procedures. Laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with less use of pain medication (P = 0.001) and a shorter hospital stay (P < 0.001), but the procedure took longer than laparotomic hysterectomy (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with intraoperative and long-term complications was not significantly different between both groups. The use of uterine manipulators did not have increased recurrence rate in patients treated with laparoscopic approach.ConclusionsThe laparoscopic surgery approach to early-stage endometrial cancer using uterine manipulators is as safe and effective as the laparotomic approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document