Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and Transfer for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Available to All?

2006 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 591
Author(s):  
Mario Ivanusa
Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadeem Khan ◽  
Mandeep Singh

Timed Up and Go test predicts one-year mortality among patients cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention Nadeem A. Khan, R. Jay Widmer, Amrit Kanwar, Mohammed A. Al-Hijji, Abdallah El Sabbagh, Ryan J. Lennon, Rajiv Gulati, Amir Lerman, Arashk Motiei, Mandeep Singh Background: Frailty is frequently seen in older adults and among patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) is a reliable and validated measure of frailty. We aim to assess 1-year mortality and stratify patients based on the performance on the test. Methods: Patients ≥55 years and referred to the cardiac catheterization laboratory underwent the TUG, a simple test to measure static and dynamic balance. We timed the patients while they were instructed to rise from the chair, walk 3 meters (or 10 feet), turn around, and walk back to the chair and sit down. Timing was divided in four categories [<7 sec (controls), 8-10 sec, 11-14 sec, and > 15 sec]. Mortality at one year was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Those with TUG >15s were older (75.8 ±9.1years vs. 71.2±9.2 years in controls; P<0.001) and more women (42% vs. 29%) had TUG >15s, P=0.002. Patients with TUG >15 s had a significantly increased risk of mortality on follow-up (HR 3.88, 95% CI 1.97-7.66; P<0.001, Figure) which remained significant after adjusting for age and sex (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.05, 3.30). Conclusions: The TUG test predicts one year mortality among patients referred to the cardiac catheterization laboratory. These data underscore the importance of frailty assessment in patients with CVD.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mir Jamaluddin ◽  
Ibrahim Khalil ◽  
Kajal Kumar Karmakar ◽  
Humayun Kabir ◽  
Rakibul Islam Litu ◽  
...  

The aim of the study is to determine the out comes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction in NICVD the only government cardiac hospital of Bangladesh where resources are very limited. Total 73 (male 70, female 3) patients were enrolled in this study who were brought in to our hospital with STEMI between August 2010 to October 2013. Average age was 55.6 ±11.78. Primary PCI was performed after transferring patient from Emergency Department to cardiac catheterization laboratory. Cardiovascular risk factors among the studied population were Diabetes mellitus, Hypertension, Smoking, Dyslipidemia and Positive family history for IHD. Primary PCI either with Bare Metal Stent (BMS) or Drug Eluting Stent (DES) were performed in total 42 LAD lesions, 28 RCA lesions and 3 LCX lesions. BMS used were 87.7%, DES used were 12.3%. The procedural success was 95.8%.Four patients (5.4%) died during hospital stay. Out of four patients who died, one had cardiogenic shock. No mortality was observed in the 30 days follow up from discharge, while other complications like unstable angina and congestive heart failure were 5.7% and 4.3% respectively. Our findings suggest favorable outcomes, matching the international data which was achieved in our patients with primary PCI in the management of STEMI despite all the limitations. Primary PCI as a preferred method of reperfusion strategy needs to be practiced more often in our part of world.University Heart Journal Vol. 9, No. 2, July 2013; 83-87


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
CM Shaheen Kabir ◽  
M Maksumul Haq ◽  
F Aaysha Cader

Objective: Coronary arteries in diabetic patients were found to be narrower than in non-diabetic subjects. The aim of the study was to compare the coronary arteries diameter between diabetic and non-diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using stent diameter for greater accuracy.Methods: This was a randomized observational study. From a dedicated database, we retrospectively analysed all consecutive patients of both gender who underwent PCI in the cardiac catheterization laboratory of Ibrahim Cardiac Hospital and Research Institute, Dhaka, Bangladesh, from January 2011 to December 2012. Patients who required left main coronary artery stenting were excluded from this study. Patients were divided into two groups; diabetics and non-diabetics. We calculated the coronary artery diameter according to the diameter of the stent, achieved at the final pressure at which the stent was deployed. The diameter which was achieved at a given atmospheric pressure was taken from the attached booklet provided with the stent packaging. If post dilatation was required then the diameter achieved by the non-compliant balloon after post dilatation was taken as the reference diameter of the artery.Results: A total of 571 patients, 333 in diabetic and 238 in non-diabetic group were included in the study. Proximal segments of left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery in diabetics and non-diabetics were 2.99±0.44 vs 3.14±0.50 mm (p=0.00) while mid and distal segments were 2.90±0.38 vs 3.10±0.42 mm (p=0.00) and 2.25±0.39 vs 2.42±0.45 mm (p=0.00) respectively. Various segments of proximal left Circumflex (LCx) coronary artery in diabetics and non-diabetics were 2.98±0.21 vs 3.01±0.25 mm (p=0.39) while distal circumflex were 2.35±0.40 vs 2.49±0.43 mm (p=0.00) respectively. Proximal segments of right coronary artery (RCA) in diabetic and nondiabetics were 3.0±0.28 vs 3.28±0.25 mm (p=0.00) while mid and distal segments were 2.97±0.26 vs 3.19±0.25 mm (p=0.00) and 2.43±0.51 vs 2.87±0.32 mm (p=0.00) respectively. The number of stents (1.34±0.87 vs 1.30±0.65; p=0.40) and type of stent utilized (DES & non DES: 87.3 & 12.7% vs 85.2 & 14.8%; p=0.50) between diabetic & non-diabetic groups were not significantly different; however the total stent length (23.1±13.3 vs 21.5±9.52 mm; p=0.03) in diabetic group was significantly longer.Conclusions: The diameter of LAD, distal circumflex and right coronary arteries were significantly narrower in diabetic than non-diabetic subjects.Bangladesh Heart Journal 2017; 32(1) : 23-28


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document