Meta-Analysis of Risk of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack With Dabigatran for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

2014 ◽  
Vol 113 (7) ◽  
pp. 1173-1177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Partha Sardar ◽  
Ramez Nairooz ◽  
Saurav Chatterjee ◽  
Jørn Wetterslev ◽  
Joydeep Ghosh ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khawaja H Akhtar ◽  
Khadija N Sami ◽  
Muhammad H Khan ◽  
Ali H Jafry ◽  
Amna M Chaudhary ◽  
...  

Introduction: We evaluated the safety of same-day discharge in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation procedure. Methods: A systematic search was conducted on 05/05/2020 by 2 independent researchers in MEDLINE, EMBASE and other databases for studies comparing the safety of same-day discharge versus overnight stay for patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. No randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, so observational studies were included in the analysis. Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (random effects model) were calculated and for heterogeneity I 2 statistics were reported. Results: A total of 5 observational studies with 5018 patients were included. There was a non-statistically significant trend towards repeat 30 day hospital visits associated with same-day discharge as compared with overnight stay (RR=1.92, CI 0.44-8.32, p=0.39) (Figure-1). There were no differences between same-day discharge vs overnight stay in other outcomes including vascular complications (RR=1.24, CI 0.48-3.23), cardiac tamponade (RR=1.01, CI 0.15-6.60), stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolic complications (RR=0.88, CI 0.05-16.19) and mortality (RR=1.03, CI 0.05=19.36) (Figure-1). Conclusion: Same day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation is safe and has the potential to be a cost-effective strategy. Randomized trials are needed to validate these results. Figure-1: Forest plot of outcomes with same-day discharge vs overnight stay for patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Guerra ◽  
Lorena Scappini ◽  
Alessandro Maolo ◽  
Gianluca Campo ◽  
Rita Pavasini ◽  
...  

Background: Stroke is a rare but serious complication of acute coronary syndrome. At present, no specific score exists to identify patients at higher risk. The aim of the present study is to test whether each clinical variable included in the CHA2DS2-VASc score retains its predictive value in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome, irrespective of atrial fibrillation. Methods: The meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. All clinical trials and observational studies presenting data on the association between stroke/transient ischemic attack incidence and at least one CHA2DS2-VASc item in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome were considered in the analysis. Atrial fibrillation diagnosis was also considered. Results: The whole cohort included 558,193 patients of which 7108 (1.3%) had an acute stroke and/or transient ischemic attack during follow-up (median nine months; 1st–3rd quartile 1–12 months). Age and previous stroke had the highest odds ratios (odds ratio 2.60; 95% confidence interval 2.21–3.06 and odds ratio 2.74; 95% confidence interval 2.19–3.42 respectively), in accordance with the two-point value given in the CHA2DS2-VASc score. All other factors were positively associated with stroke, although with lower odds ratios. Atrial fibrillation, while present in only 11.2% of the population, confirmed its association with an increased risk of stroke and/or transient ischemic attack (odds ratio 2.04; 95% confidence interval 1.71–2.44). Conclusions: All risk factors included in the CHA2DS2-VASc score are associated with stroke/ transient ischemic attack in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome, and retain similar odds ratios to what already seen in atrial fibrillation. The utility of CHA2DS2-VASc score for risk stratification of stroke in patients with acute coronary syndrome remains to be determined.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 205031211982826
Author(s):  
Pradyumna Agasthi ◽  
Kantha Ratnam Kolla ◽  
Charan Yerasi ◽  
Sibghat Tullah ◽  
Venkata Siva Pulivarthi ◽  
...  

Background: We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the benefit of patent foramen ovale closure in stroke prevention. Methods: We searched Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane central database for randomized control trials assessing the incidence of recurrent stroke after patent foramen ovale closure when compared to medical therapy. Pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random effects model. The heterogeneity among studies was tested using the χ2 test and inconsistency was quantified using the I2 statistic. Results: Our search strategy yielded 71 articles. We included five studies with a total of 3440 patients. Median age in the device group was 45 (43, 5.5) years and in the medical group was 45 (44.5, 46) years; 52% were male, 27.7% of patients had an atrial septal aneurysm, 25% had hypertension, and 20.5% had diabetes mellitus. The median follow-up time was 44 (34.5–50) months. The pooled odds ratio of recurrent stroke, transient ischemic attack and composite end point of stroke + transient ischemic attack + peripheral embolism in the patent foramen ovale closure versus medical therapy group were 0.4 (95% confidence interval 0.25–0.63, I2 = 57.5%), 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.61–1.42, I2 = 0%), and 0.6 (95% confidence interval 0.44–0.82, I2 = 0%), respectively. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was found to be significantly higher in the patent foramen ovale closure group with odds ratio of 6 (95% confidence interval 3.13–11.4, I2 = 33.5%). On subgroup analysis, patent foramen ovale closure appeared to benefit males and patients with a large shunt. Number needed to treat to prevent one recurrent stroke with patent foramen ovale closure is 42. Number needed to harm to cause one atrial fibrillation with patent foramen ovale closure is 39. Conclusion: This meta-analysis of randomized trials concludes that percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure is effective in recurrent stroke prevention especially in males and in those with a large shunt.


Stroke ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano A. Sposato ◽  
Seemant Chaturvedi ◽  
Cheng-Yang Hsieh ◽  
Carlos A. Morillo ◽  
Hooman Kamel

Atrial fibrillation (AF) can be newly detected in approximately one-fourth of patients with ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack without previously recognized AF. We present updated evidence supporting that AF detected after stroke or transient ischemic attack (AFDAS) may be a distinct clinical entity from AF known before stroke occurrence (known atrial fibrillation). Data suggest that AFDAS can arise from the interplay of cardiogenic and neurogenic forces. The embolic risk of AFDAS can be understood as a gradient defined by the prevalence of vascular comorbidities, the burden of AF, neurogenic autonomic changes, and the severity of atrial cardiopathy. The balance of existing data indicates that AFDAS has a lower prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities, a lower degree of cardiac abnormalities than known atrial fibrillation, a high proportion (52%) of very brief (<30 seconds) AF paroxysms, and is more frequently associated with insular brain infarction. These distinctive features of AFDAS may explain its recently observed lower associated risk of stroke than known atrial fibrillation. We present an updated ad-hoc meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in which the association between prolonged cardiac monitoring and reduced risk of ischemic stroke was nonsignificant (incidence rate ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.71–1.15]). These findings highlight that larger and sufficiently powered randomized controlled trials of prolonged cardiac monitoring assessing the risk of stroke recurrence are needed. Meanwhile, we call for further research on AFDAS and stroke recurrence, and a tailored approach when using prolonged cardiac monitoring after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, focusing on patients at higher risk of AFDAS and, more importantly, at higher risk of cardiac embolism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document