scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies with therapeutic potential: Broad neutralizing activity and No evidence of antibody-dependent enhancement

2021 ◽  
pp. 105185
Author(s):  
Ying-Ting Wang ◽  
Robert D. Allen ◽  
Kenneth Kim ◽  
Norazizah Shafee ◽  
Andrew J. Gonzalez ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Graham ◽  
Jeffrey Seow ◽  
Isabella Huettner ◽  
Hataf Khan ◽  
Neophytos Kouphou ◽  
...  

The interaction of the SARS–CoV–2 Spike receptor binding domain (RBD) with the ACE2 receptor on host cells is essential for viral entry. RBD is the dominant target for neutralizing antibodies and several neutralizing epitopes on RBD have been molecularly characterized. Analysis of circulating SARS–CoV–2 variants has revealed mutations arising in the RBD, the N–terminal domain (NTD) and S2 subunits of Spike. To fully understand how these mutations affect the antigenicity of Spike, we have isolated and characterized neutralizing antibodies targeting epitopes beyond the already identified RBD epitopes. Using recombinant Spike as a sorting bait, we isolated >100 Spike–reactive monoclonal antibodies from SARS–CoV–2 infected individuals. ≈45% showed neutralizing activity of which ≈20% were NTD–specific. None of the S2–specific antibodies showed neutralizing activity. Competition ELISA revealed that NTD–specific mAbs formed two distinct groups: the first group was highly potent against infectious virus, whereas the second was less potent and displayed glycan–dependant neutralization activity. Importantly, mutations present in B.1.1.7 Spike frequently conferred resistance to neutralization by the NTD–specific neutralizing antibodies. This work demonstrates that neutralizing antibodies targeting subdominant epitopes need to be considered when investigating antigenic drift in emerging variants.


2018 ◽  
Vol 202 (3) ◽  
pp. 799-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa A. Gawron ◽  
Mark Duval ◽  
Claudia Carbone ◽  
Smita Jaiswal ◽  
Aaron Wallace ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurélien Haustrate ◽  
Aline Hantute-Ghesquier ◽  
Natalia Prevarskaya ◽  
V’yacheslav Lehen’kyi

2019 ◽  
Vol 294 (51) ◽  
pp. 19616-19634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shalom A. Gurjar ◽  
Jun X. Wheeler ◽  
Meenu Wadhwa ◽  
Robin Thorpe ◽  
Ian Kimber ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 993-998 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Deregt ◽  
G. A. Gifford ◽  
M. K. Ijaz ◽  
T. C. Watts ◽  
J. E. Gilchrist ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4911-4911
Author(s):  
Ksenia Matlawska-Wasowska ◽  
James Gale ◽  
Parisa Khalili ◽  
Bridget S Wilson ◽  
Mohammad Vasef ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4911 Surface specific antigens expressed on the cell membrane of hematopoietic cells are attractive target for antibody mediated cancer cells therapy. Monoclonal antibodies involve various mechanisms to eliminate cancer cells, including antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and phagocytosis (ADCP) mediated by immune effector cells such as NK cells and macrophages bearing FcγRIIIA (CD16) receptor. Previous studies reported that clinical efficacy of monoclonal antibodies can be linked to the single nucleotide polymorphism found at position 559 in cDNA of the gene encoding FcγRIIIA. This allelic polymorphism generateses the following allotypes V/V, F/V or F/F at amino acid position 158 and can affect binding of mAbs and immune cell effector function. CD16-mediated binding is most efficient with the V/V genotype, and least efficient with the F/F genotype, leading to a range of efficacy in mAb-mediated targeted therapies. Currently, many patients are not screened for CD16 heterozygosity. Nevertheless there is a clear need for a diagnostic assay that will allow estimating the allelic polymorphism of a patient undergoing treatment with monoclonal antibodies utilizing ADCC/ADCP. Here we hypothesized that the pyrosequencing might improve a screening for polymorphisms of human FcγRIIIA-158 receptor. We studied 42 normal human subjects for the incidence of V/V, F/V and F/F CD16 polymorphisms using pyrosequencing technologies and compared to nested PCR-based allele-specific restriction assay. Compared to pyrosequencing, the nested PCR-based allele-specific restriction assay was 0. 33 sensitive and 1. 0 specific in discriminating the V/V and F/F genotypes, and 0. 33 sensitive and 0. 7 specific for the V/V and F/V genotypes (Table 1). Compared to pyrosequencing, the nested PCR-based allele-specific restriction assay was relatively insensitive and not specific in distinguishing the V/V genotype from other genotypes. Since the efficacy of the mAb-based targeted immunotherapy may be highly dependent upon the CD16 polymorphism in any given individual, we propose that pyrosequencing of the CD16 receptor be routinely evaluated in all patients. Such practices might prevent patients from randomizing to receive targeted therapies to that hematological malignancies for that have little or no therapeutic potential. Table 1 V/V F/V F/F pyrosequencing 6 16 20 allele-specific restriction assay 2 23 17 sensitivity - 0.33 0.33 specificity - 0.7 1.0 Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document