Underwater laser cutting of stainless steel up to 100 mm thick for dismantling application in nuclear power plants

2020 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 107655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Sung Shin ◽  
Seong Yong Oh ◽  
Seungkyu Park ◽  
Hyunmin Park ◽  
Taek-Soo Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Laser Cutting ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Underwater Laser

scholarly journals Fundamental Study on Underwater Cutting of 50 mm-Thick Stainless Steel Plates Using a Fiber Laser for Nuclear Decommissioning

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 495
Author(s):  
Kwan Kim ◽  
Moo-Keun Song ◽  
Su-Jin Lee ◽  
Dongsig Shin ◽  
Jeong Suh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Laser Power ◽  
Laser Cutting ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Cutting Speed ◽  
Cutting Surface ◽  
Focal Position ◽  
Underwater Laser

With nuclear power plants worldwide approaching their design lifespans, plans for decommissioning nuclear power plants are increasing, and interest in decommissioning technology is growing. Laser cutting, which is suitable for high-speed cutting in underwater environments and is amenable to remote control and automation, has attracted considerable interest. In this study, the effects of laser cutting were analyzed with respect to relevant parameters to achieve high-quality underwater laser cutting for the decommissioning of nuclear power plants. The kerf width, drag line, and roughness of the specimens during the high-power laser cutting of 50 mm-thick stainless steel in an underwater environment were analyzed based on key parameters (focal position, laser power, and cutting speed) to determine the conditions for satisfactory cutting surface quality. The results indicated that underwater laser cutting with a speed of up to 130 mm/min was possible at a focal position of 30 mm and a laser power of 9 kW; however, the best-quality cutting surface was obtained at a cutting speed of 30 mm/min.

Investigation on Acoustic Emission Characteristics from Corrosion of Conventional Materials of Primary Pipe in Nuclear Power Plants

2014 ◽  
Vol 487 ◽  
pp. 54-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Yu Chai ◽  
Li Chan Li ◽  
Wen Jie Bai ◽  
Quan Duan
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Acoustic Emission ◽  
Pitting Corrosion ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
316L Stainless Steel ◽  
304 Stainless Steel ◽  
Emission Characteristics ◽  
Research Topics

304 stainless steel and 316L stainless steel are conventional materials of primary pipeline in nuclear power plants. The present work is to summarize the acoustic emission (AE) characteristics in the process of pitting corrosion of 304 stainless steel, intergranular corrosion of 316L stainless steel and weldments of 316L stainless steel. The work also discussed the current shortcomings and problems of research. At last we proposed the coming possible research topics and directions.

Current in-service inspections of austenitic stainless steel and dissimilar metal welds in light water nuclear power plants

1994 ◽  
Vol 151 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 539-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludwig von Bernus ◽  
Werner Rathgeb ◽  
Rudi Schmid ◽  
Friedrich Mohr ◽  
Michael Kröning
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Light Water ◽  
Dissimilar Metal

scholarly journals Friction Stir Welding and Preliminary Characterization of Irradiated 304 Stainless Steel

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Tang ◽  
Maxim Gussev ◽  
Zhili Feng ◽  
Brian Gibson ◽  
Roger Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Friction Stir Welding ◽  
Base Metal ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Weld Zone ◽  
Fusion Welding ◽  
Friction Stir

Abstract The mitigation of helium induced cracking in the heat affected zone (HAZ), a transition metallurgical zone between the weld zone and base metal, during repair welding is a great challenge in nuclear industry. Successful traditional fusion welding repairs are limited to metals with a maximum of a couple of atomic parts per million (appm) helium, and structural materials helium levels in operating nuclear power plants are generally exceed a couple of appm after years of operations. Therefore, fusion welding is very limited in nuclear power plants structural materials repairing. Friction stir welding (FSW) is a solid-state joining technology that reduces the drivers (temperature and tensile residual stress) for helium-induced cracking. This paper will detail initial procedural development of FSW weld trials on irradiated 304L stainless steel (304L SS) coupons utilizing a unique welding facility located at one of Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s hot cell facilities. The successful early results of FSW of an irradiated 304L SS coupon containing high helium are discussed. Helium induced cracking was not observed by scanning electron microscopy in the friction stir weld zone and the metallurgical zones between the weld zone and base metal, i.e. thermal mechanical affected zone (TMAZ) and HAZ. Characterization of the weld, TMAZ and HAZ regions are detailed in this paper.

scholarly journals Parameters influencing the low-cycle fatigue life of materials in pressure water reactor nuclear power plants / Parametry ovlivòující únavové chování materiálù pro tlakovodní jaderné reaktory v režimu nízkocyklové únavy

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 91-98
Author(s):  
V. Šefl
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Fatigue Life ◽  
Carbon Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Low Cycle Fatigue ◽  
Cycle Fatigue

Abstract In this literature review we identify and quantify the parameters influencing the low-cycle fatigue life of materials commonly used in nuclear power plants. The parameters are divided into several groups and individually described. The main groups are material properties, mode of cycling and environment parameters. The groups are further divided by the material type - some parameters influence only certain kind of material, e.g. sulfur content may decreases fatigue life of carbon steel, but is not relevant for austenitic stainless steel; austenitic stainless steel is more sensitive to concentration of dissolved oxygen in the environment compared to the carbon steel. The combination of parameters i.e. conjoint action of several detrimental parameters is discussed. It is also noted that for certain parameters to decrease fatigue life, it is necessary for other parameter to reach certain threshold value. Two different approaches have been suggested in literature to describe this complex problem - the Fen factor and development of new design fatigue curves. The threshold values and examples of commonly used relationships for calculation of fatigue lives are included. This work is valuable because it provides the reader with long-term literature review with focus on real effect of environmental parameters on fatigue life of nuclear power plant materials.

Allowable Flaw Size of Japanese Cast Stainless Steel Pipe Using Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Method

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shotaro Hayashi ◽  
Mayumi Ochi ◽  
Kiminobu Hojo ◽  
Takahisa Yamane ◽  
Wataru Nishi
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Thermal Ageing ◽  
Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Stainless Steel Pipe ◽  
Technical Basis ◽  
Cast Stainless Steel

The cast austenitic stainless steel (CASS) that is used for the primary loop pipes of nuclear power plants is susceptible to thermal ageing during plant operation. The Japanese JSME rules on fitness-for-service (JSME rules on FFS)[1] for nuclear power plants specify the allowable flaw depths. However, some of these allowable flaw sizes are small compared with the smallest flaw sizes, which can be detected by nondestructive testing. ASME Section XI Code Case N-838[2] recently specified the maximum tolerable flaw depths for CASS pipes determined by probabilistic fracture mechanics (PFM). In a similar way, the allowable flaw depths of CASS pipes were calculated by PFM analysis code “PREFACE”[3] which considers uncertainty of the mechanical properties of Japanese PWR CASS materials. In order to confirm the validity of PREFACE, the allowable flaw depths calculated by PREFACE were compared with the maximum tolerable flaw depths in the technical basis of Code Case N-838. As a result, although the J calculation method and the embrittlement prediction model of CASS are different, these were qualitatively consistent. In addition, the sensitivity of ferrite content to the allowable flaw depths was investigated.

Development of Load Multipliers (Z-Factors) in Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Evaluation in Rules on Fitness-for-Service for Nuclear Power Plants

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seiji Asada ◽  
Masao Itatani ◽  
Naoki Miura ◽  
Hideo Machida
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Ferritic Steel ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Elastic Plastic ◽  
Surface Flaws ◽  
Steel Piping

Not only nonmandatory Appendix C, “Evaluation of Flaws in Piping,” in ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Section XI but also Appendix E-9, “Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Evaluation,” in the JSME Rules on Fitness-for-Service for Nuclear Power Plants use the load multiplier Z-factor that is applied to elastic-plastic fracture mechanics evaluation for a circumferential flaw of austenitic stainless steel piping and ferritic steel piping. The Z-factor is defined as the ratio of the limit load to the load at fracture load. Basically, the Z-factor equations were conservatively formulated by using the Z-factors for circumferential through-wall flaws. However, the Codes require flaw evaluation for circumferential surface flaws. Accordingly, Z-factors for circumferential surface flaws should be developed to have the consistency. Therefore Z-factor equations of austenitic stainless steel piping and ferritic steel piping have been developed for circumferential surface flaws.

High cycle thermal fatigue Issues in PWR nuclear power plants, life time improvement of some austenitic stainless steel components

2007 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 156-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. -A. Le Duff ◽  
A. Lefrançois ◽  
Y. Meyzaud ◽  
J.-Ph. Vernot ◽  
D. Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Thermal Fatigue ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Life Time ◽  
High Cycle Thermal Fatigue
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document