scholarly journals Fuel utilization effects on system efficiency in solid oxide fuel cell gas turbine hybrid systems

2018 ◽  
Vol 228 ◽  
pp. 1953-1965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danylo Oryshchyn ◽  
Nor Farida Harun ◽  
David Tucker ◽  
Kenneth M. Bryden ◽  
Lawrence Shadle
Energy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. 743-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dang Saebea ◽  
Loredana Magistri ◽  
Aristide Massardo ◽  
Amornchai Arpornwichanop

Author(s):  
James D. Maclay ◽  
Jacob Brouwer ◽  
G. Scott Samuelsen

Solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine (SOFC-GT) hybrid systems are attractive for future power generation with ultra-low criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions. One of the challenges for SOFC-GT systems is to sufficiently pre-heat incoming air before it enters the fuel cell cathode. An ejector for cathode exhaust recirculation has the benefits of reliability, low maintenance, and cost compared to either recuperators or cathode recirculation blowers, which may be also be used for air pre-heating. In this study, a dynamic Simulink model of an ejector for cathode exhaust recirculation to pre-heat incoming fuel cell air has been developed. The ejector is to be utilized within a 100 MW SOFC-GT dynamic model operating on coal syngas. A thorough theoretical development is presented. Results for the ejector were found to be in good agreement with those reported in literature.


2020 ◽  
Vol 272 ◽  
pp. 115160
Author(s):  
Hao Chen ◽  
Chen Yang ◽  
Nana Zhou ◽  
Nor Farida Harun ◽  
Danylo Oryshchyn ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
K. J. Bosch ◽  
N. Woudstra ◽  
K. V. van der Nat

In conventional gas turbine systems combustion results in high exergy losses (∼30%) of fuel exergy input. Replacing the combustor with a high temperature fuel cell, like the Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC), will significantly reduce these exergy losses. As the SOFC electrochemically converts the natural gas, exergy losses are far lower (∼10%) compared to combustion. Natural gas entering a SOFC system has to be reformed first to hydrogen and carbon monoxide by steam reforming. Here it is chosen to use the heat generated by the fuel cell to drive the endothermic reforming reactions: internal reforming. The SOFC-GT system has the advantage that both fuel cell and gas turbine technology contribute to power production. In earlier work [1] several fuel cell system configurations with PEMFC, MCFC or SOFC, were analyzed studying the exergy flows. Here is focused on the SOFC-GT configuration, to get a detailed understanding of the exergy flows and losses through all individual components. Several configurations, combining the SOFC with the GT are possible. The selected operating conditions should prevent carbon deposition. Systems studies are performed to get more insight in the exergy losses in these combined systems. Exergy analysis facilitates the search for the high efficient SOFC-GT hybrid systems. Using exergy analysis, several useful configurations are found. Exergy losses are minimized by varying pressure ratio and turbine inlet temperature. Sensitivity studies, of equivalent cell resistance and fuel cell temperature, show that total system exergy efficiencies of more than 80% are conceivable, without using a bottoming cycle.


2002 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Rao ◽  
G. S. Samuelsen

The goals of a research program recently completed at the University of California, Irvine were to develop analysis strategy for solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) based systems, to apply the analysis strategy to tubular SOFC hybrid systems and to identify promising hybrid configurations. A pressurized tubular SOFC combined with an intercooled-reheat gas turbine (SureCell™ cycle) is chosen as the base cycle over which improvements are sought. The humid air turbine (HAT) cycle features are incorporated to the base cycle resulting in the SOFC-HAT hybrid cycle which shows an efficiency of 69.05 percent while the base cycle has an efficiency of 66.23 percent. Exergy analysis identified the superior efficiency performance of the SOFC component. Therefore, an additional cycle variation added a second SOFC component followed by a low pressure combustor in place of the reheat combustor of the gas turbine of the SOFC-HAT hybrid. The resulting dual SOFC-HAT hybrid has a thermal efficiency of 75.98 percent. The single SOFC-HAT hybrid gives the lowest cost of electricity (3.54¢/kW-hr) while the dual SOFC-HAT hybrid has the highest cost of electricity (4.02¢/kW-hr) among the three cycles with natural gas priced at $3/GJ. The dual SOFC-HAT hybrid plant cost is calculated to be significantly higher because the fraction of power produced by the SOFC(s) is significantly higher than that in the other cases on the basis of $1100/kw initial cost for the SOFC. The dual SOFC-HAT hybrid can only be justified in favor of the single SOFC-HAT hybrid when the price of natural gas is greater than $14/GJ or if a severe carbon tax on the order of $180/ton of CO2 is imposed while natural gas price remains at $3/GJ.


Author(s):  
Ji Hye Yi ◽  
Ju Hwan Choi ◽  
Tong Seop Kim

Various options in combining a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) with a gas turbine (GT) were compared in this study. The combination of an SOFC with either a simple gas turbine or a gas/steam turbine combined cycle was investigated. For each combined system, the effect of using a recuperative heat exchanger was examined. The design parameters of a state-of-the-art gas turbine for central power stations were used. The GT modeling included modulation of turbine coolant flow depending on turbine working conditions. An SOFC temperature of 900°C was used. Given a currently available reference voltage, pressure-dependent SOFC cell voltage was used. The analysis was divided into two parts. In the first part, the turbine inlet temperature of the reference gas turbine was given and the influence of pressure ratio was analyzed. In the second part, the influence of varying turbine inlet temperature was analyzed to search for optimal design conditions. The results showed that the SOFC/GTCC systems would provide considerably higher efficiencies than the SOFC/GT systems. The optimal pressure ratio in terms of system efficiency is over 30 for non-recuperated systems but is around 10 for recuperated systems. Reducing the extra fuel to the gas turbine combustor improves system efficiency, especially in the SOFC/GT systems. With zero extra fuel, efficiencies of all of the four systems exceed 70%, the highest of which is obtained by the recuperated SOFC/GTCC layout.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document