Article 4: Functional Recovery and Mobility Device Use Within a General Rehabilitation Population

2008 ◽  
Vol 89 (10) ◽  
pp. e2
Author(s):  
Susan Coulson ◽  
Jeffrey Jutai ◽  
Louise Demers ◽  
Frank DeRuyter ◽  
Marcus Fuhrer ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (12) ◽  
pp. 2872-2880
Author(s):  
Shirley M. Bluethmann ◽  
Eileen Flores ◽  
Grace Campbell ◽  
Heidi D. Klepin

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 853-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy M. Gell ◽  
Robert B. Wallace ◽  
Andrea Z. LaCroix ◽  
Tracy M. Mroz ◽  
Kushang V. Patel

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 233372141988529
Author(s):  
Hongdao Meng ◽  
Lindsay J. Peterson ◽  
Lijuan Feng ◽  
Debra Dobbs ◽  
Kathryn Hyer

Objective: To examine whether mobility device use substitutes for personal assistance among U.S. older adults. Method: Using the National Health and Aging Trends Study, we identified 3,211 community-living older adults (aged 65 and older) who reported mobility difficulties at baseline. We used recursive bivariate probit models to simultaneously estimate the effect of covariates on the likelihood of using (a) mobility devices and (b) personal assistance to accommodate mobility difficulty. Independent variables included age, gender, race, physical/mental health status, cognition, and comorbidities. Results: Predictors of the use of personal assistance and mobility devices exhibit important similarities and differences. Device use reduced the odds of receiving personal assistance by 50% (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.29, 0.86]). Discussion: Findings suggest device use substitutes for personal assistance. Practitioners and policymakers should promote the appropriate use of mobility devices while recognizing the importance of assistance with some groups and the potential of increasing mobility device use.


2002 ◽  
Vol 82 (9) ◽  
pp. 856-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C Miller ◽  
Mark Speechley ◽  
A Barry Deathe

AbstractBackground and Purpose. Confidence in a person's balance has been shown to be an important predictor of social activity among people with lower-limb amputations. The purposes of this study were to describe confidence in balance among people with transtibial or transfemoral lower-limb amputations and to compare people whose amputations were due to vascular and nonvascular causes. Subjects and Methods. A survey of a sample of 435 community-dwelling individuals from 2 regional clinics was conducted. The sample consisted of people with unilateral transfemoral (26.7%) and transtibial (73.3%) amputations who lost their limb for vascular (53%) and nonvascular (47%) reasons. The mean age of the primarily male (71%) sample was 62.0 years (SD=15.7). Results. Mean scores, using the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale, were 63.8 for the total sample, 54.1 for the subjects with amputations due to vascular reasons, and 74.7 for the subjects with amputations due to nonvascular reasons. Given a maximum possible ABC Scale score of 100, the results suggest that confidence was low. A difference between the subjects with amputations due to vascular reasons and those with amputations due to nonvascular reasons was observed over each item of the ABC Scale. Variables that were statistically related to balance confidence included age, sex, etiology, mobility device use, the need to concentrate while walking, limitations in activities of daily living, depression, and fear of falling. Discussion and Conclusion. Balance confidence scores among the study sample were low when compared with values previously reported by other researchers. Confidence was particularly low among individuals who had their amputation for vascular reasons. Balance confidence might be an important area of clinical concern.


2017 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 250-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Kylberg ◽  
Charlotte Löfqvist ◽  
Vibeke Horstmann ◽  
Susanne Iwarsson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document