Is feather pecking in laying hens a by-product of artificial selection?

2010 ◽  
Vol 122 (2-4) ◽  
pp. 133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeroen van Rooijen
2011 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. 1145-1152 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Brunberg ◽  
P. Jensen ◽  
A. Isaksson ◽  
L. Keeling

2016 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.M. Hartcher ◽  
S.J. Wilkinson ◽  
P.H. Hemsworth ◽  
G.M. Cronin

2004 ◽  
Vol 86 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 77-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.B. Kjaer ◽  
B.M. Hjarvard ◽  
K.H. Jensen ◽  
J. Hansen-Møller ◽  
O. Naesbye Larsen

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.G. Johannson ◽  
C. Raginski ◽  
K. Schwean-Lardner ◽  
H.L. Classen

Two trials were conducted to study the effect of feeding barley silage on the behaviour and performance of beak-trimmed laying hens. In each trial, 20 hens and 2 roosters were housed in each of eight group-housed enriched cages, with four cages provided a laying hen diet and four cages additionally given free access to barley silage. Egg production and quality, and hen behaviour were assessed throughout the trials (Trial One 20–30 weeks; Trial Two 19–28 weeks). Data were analysed using Proc Mixed of SAS 9.4 and differences were significant when P ≤ 0.05. Silage-fed hens consumed 41 (13.9 g DM) and 50 (13.5 g DM) grams of silage per hen per day in Trials One and Two, respectively, while consuming less layer diet. Birds fed silage spent less time expressing aggressive and feather-pecking behaviours and in nest boxes, and more time feeding than control birds. Egg production, egg quality, and bird weight were not affected by treatment; yolk colour was darker for the silage treatment. Feathering quality was improved in silage-fed birds compared to control birds. It was concluded that providing hens with access to barley silage can improve welfare indicators without negatively affecting the egg production and egg quality.


2013 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 361-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.B. Rodenburg ◽  
M.M. Van Krimpen ◽  
I.C. De Jong ◽  
E.N. De Haas ◽  
M.S. Kops ◽  
...  

BMC Genetics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clemens Falker-Gieske ◽  
Hanna Iffland ◽  
Siegfried Preuß ◽  
Werner Bessei ◽  
Cord Drögemüller ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Feather pecking (FP) is damaging behavior in laying hens leading to global economic losses in the layer industry and massive impairments of animal welfare. The objective of the study was to discover genetic variants and affected genes that lead to FP behavior. To achieve that we imputed low-density genotypes from two different populations of layers divergently selected for FP to sequence level by performing whole genome sequencing on founder and half-sib individuals. In order to decipher the genetic structure of FP, genome wide association studies and meta-analyses of two resource populations were carried out by focusing on the traits ‘feather pecks delivered’ (FPD) and the ‘posterior probability of a hen to belong to the extreme feather pecking subgroup’ (pEFP). Results In this meta-analysis, we discovered numerous genes that are affected by polymorphisms significantly associated with the trait FPD. Among them SPATS2L, ZEB2, KCHN8, and MRPL13 which have been previously connected to psychiatric disorders with the latter two being responsive to nicotine treatment. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed that phosphatidylinositol signaling is affected by genes identified in the GWAS and that the Golgi apparatus as well as brain structure may be involved in the development of a FP phenotype. Further, we were able to validate a previously discovered QTL for the trait pEFP on GGA1, which contains variants affecting NIPA1, KIAA1211L, AFF3, and TSGA10. Conclusions We provide evidence for the involvement of numerous genes in the propensity to exhibit FP behavior that could aid in the selection against this unwanted trait. Furthermore, we identified variants that are involved in phosphatidylinositol signaling, Golgi metabolism and cell structure and therefore propose changes in brain structure to be an influential factor in FP, as already described in human neuropsychiatric disorders.


Author(s):  
D M Alvey ◽  
S A Tucker

There is continuing public concern about the welfare of poultry kept in battery cages. However, current alternative systems would be unsuitable to fill the gap if cages were to be banned. Many welfare problems have been encountered with alternative systems. These include feather pecking, cannibalism, poor foot condition, bone breakage, poor production, high feed intake and floor egg laying. In 4 studies, between 1988 and 1992, the effect of the Gleadthorpe design of perchery on the performance, behaviour and welfare of laying hens was evaluated.The perchery consisted of 2 perch units constructed on wooden slatted platforms over a droppings pit. A block of 5 tier high nestboxes was provided along each side of the perchery. The nestboxes were of a rear roll-away type and contained “Astroturf” nest pads. Litter areas were available between the 2 perch units and between the perch units and the blocks of nest boxes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document