Trends in Medical Specialization and Employability in Mexico According to Gender

Author(s):  
Ana Carolina Sepúlveda-Vildósola ◽  
Horacio-Márquez González ◽  
María Fernanda López-Sepúlveda ◽  
Cecilia Beatriz Martínez-Escobar
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 481-481
Author(s):  
T. E. C.

Abraham Jacobi (1830-1919), this country's first professor of infantile pathology and therapeutics, and the first to establish a children's clinic in the United States (1860), had strong views concerning medical specialization. This is evident in the quotation below, taken from an address he gave at the 1880 meeting of the American Medical Association.1 We are surrounded by specialists of all sizes and regions. The human body is held no longer to be an organism, but a conglomerate of organs which have no connection with each other. One man doctors the eye as another plays on the violin; another the larynx, as one plays the harp; another on the rectum, as one handles the bass. Eyes are by this time a recognized specialty, the practice on which requires a great deal of practical skill and dexterity. The ears have been thrown in, as, though the diagnosis of their diseases has made great progress, their medication and other treatment is, in many cases, rather a thankless task. Nose, throat, and larynx have been conquered as special property. Lungs and heart are also claimed as such; the urinary organs are invaded by specialists; the sexual organs of the male are the field of operation on the part of specialists; the sexual organs of the female, with their appendages, are sacred property of another class, and these appendages are said to extend from top to toe; the skin, this fourteen square feet domain, is no longer subject to the general practitioner; the hair is coveted by one specialist, corns by another, nervous diseases by this, rheumatism by that specialist.


2020 ◽  
pp. 79-109
Author(s):  
Eric M. Patashnik ◽  
Alan S. Gerber ◽  
Conor M. Dowling

This chapter explores the institutional roots of medical professionalism in the United States. It examines why the U.S. health care system delegates therapeutic authority to individual doctors and medical societies, with little centralized oversight in programs like Medicare. The chapter also presents findings from a national survey of physicians to gauge their views on the proper role of medical societies in medical evidence controversies. Although the tradition of professional autonomy places the physician at the center of the U.S. health care system, the survey evidence suggests that physicians do not recognize the important role their own beliefs (and potential misconceptions) about what constitutes good medical practice play in contributing to the problems of overutilization and inefficiency. The survey also reveals that doctors generally want their medical societies to forcefully defend treatments challenged by research. At the same time, the survey uncovers notable differences among the views of physicians based on both their medical specialization and partisan affiliation. Doctors who identify with the Republican Party place a somewhat higher priority on protecting clinical autonomy (and a somewhat lower priority on discouraging clinical interventions with minor or no benefits) than do doctors who identify with the Democratic Party.


JAMA ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 217 (12) ◽  
pp. 1688-1690 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. C. Long

2020 ◽  
pp. 0957154X2096729
Author(s):  
Cara Dobbing ◽  
Alannah Tomkins

The nineteenth century witnessed a great shift in how insanity was regarded and treated. Well documented is the emergence of psychiatry as a medical specialization and the role of lunatic asylums in the West. Unclear are the relationships between the heads of institutions and the individuals treated within them. This article uses two cases at either end of the nineteenth century to demonstrate sexual misdemeanours in sites of mental health care, and particularly how they were dealt with, both legally and in the press. They illustrate issues around cultures of complaint and the consequences of these for medical careers. Far from being representative, they highlight the need for further research into the doctor–patient relationship within asylums, and what happened when the boundaries were blurred.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document