scholarly journals Brain metastases in de novo breast cancer: An updated population-level study from SEER database

Author(s):  
Ming-Shuai Sun ◽  
Yong-Yang Yun ◽  
Hong-Jin Liu ◽  
Zheng-Heng Yu ◽  
Fan Yang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13055-e13055
Author(s):  
Sonya Chew ◽  
Hailey Kathryn Carroll ◽  
Waseem Mohammed Zaid Darwish ◽  
Michaela Jane Higgins ◽  
John McCaffrey ◽  
...  

e13055 Background: Up to 30% of patients (pts) with breast cancer (BC) will develop brain metastases (BM) during the course of their disease. BM can have a devastating effect on independence and quality of life. The incidence of BM and overall survival (OS) differs according to BC subtype. We sought to characterise disease course, treatments and outcomes for our patient cohort with BM over the last 5 years. Methods: We extracted clinicopathological data using electronic records from Jan 2015 to Dec 2020 on BC subtype, time to BM development, type and number of therapies given for BM, and OS from BM diagnosis. Results were generated using SPSS Statistics v27. Results: We identified 99 pts. Median age was 49 (Interquartile range (IQR) 41 to 57). Of the BC subtypes; 41 (41.4%) were hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2-; 28 (28.2%) HR+/HER2+; 15 (15.2%) HR-/HER2+ and 15 (15.2%) were HR-/HER2-. 20% presented with de novo MBC (of which 4 had BM at presentation) and 80% had relapsed MBC. At first presentation with MBC (relapsed and de novo) 74% of pts had no brain metastases, 18% had BM with extracranial disease and 8% had BM only with no extracranial disease (5 had HER2+, 2 had HR-/HER2- and 1 had HR+/HER2-). HR-/HER2- pts had the highest incidence (40%) of presentation of BM at MBC diagnosis. Median time to BM development was 17 months (HR+/Her2-), 11 months (HR+/HER2+), 12 months (HR-/HER2+) and 3 months (HR-/HER2-). Almost half (46%) of pts had systemic treatment after developing BM. HR+Her2+ pts received the most treatment lines post BM development with a median of 2 lines (range 1-6). Almost 70% of pts (n=68) received local therapy for brain metastases with a median of 1 line of treatment (IQR 1-2). Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) (n=48, 70%) was the most frequently used modality followed by surgery (n=15, 23%) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) (n=5, 7%). Patients with HER2+ BM had the highest incidence of receiving SBRT or surgery in the first line (33%). In pts who received WBRT alone (n=40) the median time to death post WBRT was 2.6 months, while in those who received surgery or SBRT (n=20) the median time to death was 15.5 months. Median OS from BM diagnosis was 4 months (HR+/HER2-), 10 months (HR+/HER2+), 8 months (HR-/HER2+), and 2 months (HR-/HER2-). For the 15 pts with HER2+ BC given TDM-1 after BM development 60% had a progression free survival of 1 year. 3 pts received palbociclib after BM in the first line and all died within 3 months. Conclusions: OS from BM diagnosis in our cohort is similar to international figures, with HR-/HER2- pts having the worst prognosis. Although our cohort is small, OS was >1 year for 60% of HER2+ pts who received TDM1 after BM development which is encouraging for antibody drug conjugates and CNS activity. OS was poor at less than 3 months for pts who received WBRT indicating higher burden of disease in the CNS and highlights an important question about whether it has a role in this setting.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Zhang ◽  
Shiping Luo ◽  
Zhaozhen Qiu ◽  
Yuxiang Lin ◽  
Chuangui Song

Purpose: In our study, we aimed to evaluate the role of postoperative radiotherapy for patents with de novo stage IV breast cancer.Patients and Methods: Patients diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer from 2010 to 2016 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database. Those patients who received both chemotherapy and surgery and lived longer than 6 months were divided into radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the survival outcomes before and after being 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM). Subgroup analyses stratified by age, subtype, status of distant metastasis, and surgery type were also performed.Results: Among 1,935 patients, 52% (1006) underwent radiotherapy while the non-radiotherapy group contained 48% (929). After PSM, a total of 1,520 patients in two groups of 760 patients were enrolled in this analysis. Kaplan-Meier and the multivariate survival analysis demonstrated that the radiotherapy group presented with a better prognosis compared to the non-radiotherapy group (after PSM, BCSS: Hazard Ratio, 0.697; 95% confidence interval, 0.59–0.823; P < 0.001; OS: Hazard Ratio, 0.707; 95% confidence interval, 0.601–0.831; P < 0.001). Further subgroup analyses showed the Luminal subtype (HR+/HER2–), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and bone-only metastasis patients presented with the most promising survival in the radiotherapy group.Conclusions: Postoperative radiotherapy is associated with a significant survival advantages in BCSS and OS. It can be an optimal supplementary treatment for stage IV patients after surgery, especially for Luminal subtype, TNBC, and patients with a low metastatic burden.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1094-1094
Author(s):  
Neelima Vidula ◽  
Andrzej Niemierko ◽  
Katherine Hesler ◽  
Steven J. Isakoff ◽  
Dejan Juric ◽  
...  

1094 Background: The genomics of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who develop brain metastases (BM) is not well understood given the difficulty in obtaining brain tumor for genotyping. We compared tumor genotyping results via cell-free DNA (cfDNA) collected at MBC diagnosis in patients who developed BM after MBC diagnosis with those who did not develop BM (non-BM). Methods: Patients at an academic institution who had cfDNA testing (Guardant 360/Next generation sequencing, 73 gene assay) at MBC diagnosis between 1/2016-12/2017, with ≥ 6 months of follow-up post testing, were identified. A chart review was done to identify tumor subtype, demographics, cfDNA results, and development of BM at or after MBC diagnosis. Pearson’s chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to determine differences in clinical and cfDNA characteristics in BM vs. non-BM (p<0.05 for statistical significance). Results: CfDNA results were available for 49 patients, of whom 13 (27%) developed BM (4 with BM at MBC diagnosis). The median time to BM development was 11 months. While patients with BM were younger at MBC diagnosis than non-BM (median age BM 53 vs. non-BM 61, p=0.05), they had similar subtype (BM vs. non-BM: HR+/HER2- 62% vs. 69%, HER2+ 8% vs. 14%, TNBC 23% vs. 17%, unknown 8% vs. 0%, p=0.3), de-novo vs. recurrent disease (BM vs. non-BM: de-novo 8% vs. 14%, recurrent 92% vs. 86%, p=0.6), and visceral disease (BM vs. non-BM: 77% vs. 56%, p=0.2) distributions. All patients with BM had ≥1 detectable cfDNA mutation vs. 88% of non-BM. While the median mutant allele frequency of the most common mutation was similar in BM vs. non-BM (2.4% vs. 3.7%, p=0.5), the mutation pattern varied. Patients with BM more often had mutations in BRCA1 (15% vs. 3%, p=0.1), APC (15% vs. 0%, p=0.02), and CDKN2A (15% vs. 0%, p=0.02), compared to non-BM. In 4 patients with BM at MBC diagnosis, mutations in APC (50%), CDKN2A (50%), and BRCA 1/2 (25%) were noted; 1 had coexisting APC and BRCA1/2 mutations and another had coexisting APC and CDKN2A mutations. Conclusions: Patients with MBC who develop BM may have different cfDNA genomics, particularly BRCA1, APC, and CDKN2A mutations. Further research is needed to determine the predictive value of cfDNA at MBC diagnosis in the identification of patients at higher risk of developing BM. [Table: see text]


Tumor Biology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 101042831770508 ◽  
Author(s):  
San-Gang Wu ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Li-Ying Tang ◽  
Jia-Yuan Sun ◽  
Wen-Wen Zhang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. e135-e141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongliang Chen ◽  
Mingdi Zhang ◽  
Maoli Wang ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Fang Bai ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
Anteneh A. Tesfaye ◽  
Mohammad Mozayen ◽  
Ioana Morariu ◽  
David S. Eilender

37 Background: Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is a recognized risk factor of breast cancer. Data evaluating the behavior of breast cancer arising after LCIS is lacking. Our study compared the characteristics of breast cancer arising after LCIS with the breast cancer arising de novo. Methods: From the 1973-2009 SEER database, women with breast cancer who were diagnosed and treated between 1990 and 2009 were abstracted. Patients were divided to group A: breast cancer after LCIS, group B: de novo breast cancer. Age, ethnicity, staging, tumor size, grade and hormone receptor status were reviewed. Data were analyzed using chi square, Kaplan-Meier, Life table, and Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Patients with LCIS were 7,258 with 547 (7.5%) developing breast cancer subsequently. The mean (SD) time to develop breast cancer after LCIS was 68 (2.14) months. Of the total 557,309 patients with breast cancer, group A had 547 patients and group B had 556,762 patients. The median tumor size was 1.3 and 1.8 cm in groups A and B respectively (p<0.0001). Grade 1 and 2 tumors were 78.5% and 60.8% in groups A and B respectively (p<0.0001). Local disease alone was seen in 70% and 61% of groups A and B respectively (p<0.0001). ER-PR negative tumor was seen in 14.9% and 24.5 % in groups A and B (p<0.0001). On univariate analysis, 5 year cancer specific survival was 91% and 85% in groups A and B respectively (p< 0.0001). Unlike grade, hormone receptor status and stage, prior history of LCIS was not an independent predictor of survival on multivariate analysis (see Table). Conclusions: Breast cancer diagnosed after prior LCIS has favorable features like smaller tumor, lower grade, earlier stage and less ER-PR negativity. Some of these might be a result of more diligent subsequent screening. A history of LCIS per se is not an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1031-1031
Author(s):  
Monika Devanaboyina ◽  
Morgan Marie Bailey ◽  
Danae M. Hamouda

1031 Background: Breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) de novo is associated with the worst prognosis among all types of metastases in breast cancer (BC). Analysis of factors associated with BCBM stratified by subtype of BC could lead to earlier identification of metastasis. Methods: 1,268 patients with BCBM at the time of BC diagnosis and known clinical subtype (580 HR+/HER2-, 225 HR+/HER2+, 176 HR-/HER2+, and 287 HR-/HER2-) who were ≥ 20 years of age from 2010 to 2017 were identified using the NCI’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program 18 registry. Baseline characteristics and survival were analyzed using Chi-Square and Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Patients with HR-/HER2+ BC were the most likely to present with BCBM, compared to all BC patients (prevalence of 13.9% vs. 4.7%; p<0.001). Further analysis demonstrated that HER2+ patients had an odds ratio of presenting with BCBM of 2.52 (95% CI: 2.24-2.84) compared to HER2- patients. Interestingly, in patients ages 20-39 with HR-/HER2+ BC, higher rates of brain metastases are noted within the BCBM group compared to all HR-/HER2+ breast cancer cases (28% vs. 7.6%; p<0.001). The same trend is seen within the HR-/HER2+ African American population, with those in the BCBM group experiencing higher rates of brain metastases compared to all BC cases with the same subtype (14.3% vs. 5.9%; p<0.001). Upon exploring insurance demographics, uninsured patients with HR-/HER2+ BCBM had much higher rates of brain metastases compared to all HR-/HER2+ BC cases (14.8% vs 6.4%; p=0.001). When examining TNM status, significant associations were noted between brain metastases and increased tumor and nodal status. Patients with T4 or N3 status with HR-/HER2+ BCBM exhibited much higher rates of metastasis compared to all BC cases with the same subtype (p<0.001). Analysis of survival outcomes showed a median overall survival of 12 months for patients with HR-/HER2+ BCBM. The results displayed in the table below show that HR-/HER2- BCBM patients had the lowest 5-year percent survival, while HR+/HER2+ BCBM patients had the highest 5-year survival. Conclusions: This SEER database study provides insight into the demographics, clinical variables, and outcomes for BC clinical subtypes, specifically HR-/HER2+, from 2010 to 2017 in the United States. HR-/HER2+ breast cancer patients within the noted high-risk populations should be made aware of the increased rates of brain metastases compared to the general BC population, as earlier identification of brain metastases within the HR-/HER2+ cohort could improve patient survival.[Table: see text]


2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Laakmann ◽  
I Witzel ◽  
A Thiesen ◽  
T Fehm ◽  
G von Minckwitz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document