scholarly journals How do we treat the patients with penetrating traumatic brain injury - a multicentre study collaborating South Africa, Sweden, Finland and the UK

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 100787
Author(s):  
I. Hossain ◽  
C. Arnold-Day ◽  
J. Posti ◽  
N. Marklund ◽  
P. Hutchinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Multicentre Study ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Penetrating Traumatic Brain Injury

Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Martin ◽  
Lara Zimmermann ◽  
Kee D. Kim ◽  
Marike Zwienenberg ◽  
Kiarash Shahlaie
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Neurocritical Care ◽  
Secondary Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Oxygenation ◽  
Barbiturate Coma ◽  
Blast Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Penetrating Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Patients with severe traumatic brain injury are best treated with a multidisciplinary, evidence-based, protocol-directed approach, which has been shown to decrease mortality and improve functional outcomes. Therapy is directed at the prevention of secondary brain injury through optimizing cerebral blood flow and the delivery of metabolic fuel (ie, oxygen and glucose). This is accomplished through the measurement and treatment of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), the strict avoidance of hypotension and hypoxemia, and in some instances, surgical management. The treatment of elevated ICP is approached in a protocolized, tiered manner, with escalation of care occurring in the setting of refractory intracranial hypertension, culminating in either decompressive surgery or barbiturate coma. With such an approach, the rates of mortality secondary to traumatic brain injury are declining despite an increasing incidence of traumatic brain injury. This review contains 3 figures, 5 tables and 69 reference Key Words: blast traumatic brain injury, brain oxygenation, cerebral perfusion pressure, decompressive craniectomy, hyperosmolar therapy, intracranial pressure, neurocritical care, penetrating traumatic brain injury, severe traumatic brain injury

Models of Mortality Probability in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Results of the Modelling by the UK Trauma Registry

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (24) ◽  
pp. 2021-2030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Moazzez Lesko ◽  
Tom Jenks ◽  
Pablo Perel ◽  
Sarah O'Brien ◽  
Charmaine Childs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Trauma Registry ◽  
Mortality Probability ◽  
The Uk

Characterization of a Novel Rat Model of Penetrating Traumatic Brain Injury

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1219-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Plantman ◽  
Kian Chye Ng ◽  
Jia Lu ◽  
Johan Davidsson ◽  
Mårten Risling
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Rat Model ◽  
Penetrating Traumatic Brain Injury

scholarly journals Prognostic performance of computerized tomography scoring systems in civilian penetrating traumatic brain injury: an observational study

2019 ◽  
Vol 161 (12) ◽  
pp. 2467-2478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matias Lindfors ◽  
Caroline Lindblad ◽  
David W. Nelson ◽  
Bo-Michael Bellander ◽  
Jari Siironen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Computerized Tomography ◽  
Outcome Prediction ◽  
Unfavorable Outcome ◽  
Receiver Operating Curve ◽  
Excellent Performance ◽  
Head Ct ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Penetrating Traumatic Brain Injury

Abstract Background The prognosis of penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI) is poor yet highly variable. Current computerized tomography (CT) severity scores are commonly not used for pTBI prognostication but may provide important clinical information in these cohorts. Methods All consecutive pTBI patients from two large neurotrauma databases (Helsinki 1999–2015, Stockholm 2005–2014) were included. Outcome measures were 6-month mortality and unfavorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale 1–3). Admission head CT scans were assessed according to the following: Marshall CT classification, Rotterdam CT score, Stockholm CT score, and Helsinki CT score. The discrimination (area under the receiver operating curve, AUC) and explanatory variance (pseudo-R2) of the CT scores were assessed individually and in addition to a base model including age, motor response, and pupil responsiveness. Results Altogether, 75 patients were included. Overall 6-month mortality and unfavorable outcome were 45% and 61% for all patients, and 31% and 51% for actively treated patients. The CT scores’ AUCs and pseudo-R2s varied between 0.77–0.90 and 0.35–0.60 for mortality prediction and between 0.85–0.89 and 0.50–0.57 for unfavorable outcome prediction. The base model showed excellent performance for mortality (AUC 0.94, pseudo-R2 0.71) and unfavorable outcome (AUC 0.89, pseudo-R2 0.53) prediction. None of the CT scores increased the base model’s AUC (p > 0.05) yet increased its pseudo-R2 (0.09–0.15) for unfavorable outcome prediction. Conclusion Existing head CT scores demonstrate good-to-excellent performance in 6-month outcome prediction in pTBI patients. However, they do not add independent information to known outcome predictors, indicating that a unique score capturing the intracranial severity in pTBI may be warranted.

scholarly journals Evaluating the impact of cycle helmet use on severe traumatic brain injury and death in a national cohort of over 11000 pedal cyclists: a retrospective study from the NHS England Trauma Audit and Research Network dataset

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e027845 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Dodds ◽  
Rowena Johnson ◽  
Benjamin Walton ◽  
Omar Bouamra ◽  
David Yates ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Lower Limb Injury ◽  
Helmet Use ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
National Cohort ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

ObjectivesIn the last 10 years there has been a significant increase in cycle traffic in the UK, with an associated increase in the overall number of cycling injuries. Despite this, and the significant media, political and public health debate into this issue, there remains an absence of studies from the UK assessing the impact of helmet use on rates of serious injury presenting to the National Health Service (NHS) in cyclists.SettingThe NHS England Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) Database was interrogated to identify all adult (≥16 years) patients presenting to hospital with cycling-related major injuries, during a period from 14 March 2012 to 30 September 2017 (the last date for which a validated dataset was available).Participants11 192 patients met inclusion criteria. Data on the use of cycling helmets were available in 6621 patients.Outcome measuresTARN injury descriptors were used to compare patterns of injury, care and mortality in helmeted versus non-helmeted cohorts.ResultsData on cycle helmet use were available for 6621 of the 11 192 cycle-related injuries entered onto the TARN Database in the 66 months of this study (93 excluded as not pedal cyclists). There was a significantly higher crude 30-day mortality in un-helmeted cyclists 5.6% (4.8%–6.6%) versus helmeted cyclists 1.8% (1.4%–2.2%) (p<0.001). Cycle helmet use was also associated with a reduction in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) 19.1% (780, 18.0%–20.4%) versus 47.6% (1211, 45.6%–49.5%) (p<0.001), intensive care unit requirement 19.6% (797, 18.4%–20.8%) versus 27.1% (691, 25.4%–28.9%) (p<0.001) and neurosurgical intervention 2.5% (103, 2.1%–3.1%) versus 8.5% (217, 7.5%–9.7%) (p<0.001). There was a statistically significant increase in chest, spinal, upper and lower limb injury in the helmeted group in comparison to the un-helmeted group (all p<0.001), though in a subsequent analysis of these anatomical injury patterns, those cyclists wearing helmets were still found to have lower rates of TBI. In reviewing TARN injury codes for specific TBI and facial injuries, there was a highly significant decrease in rates of impact injury between cyclists wearing helmets and those not.ConclusionsThis study suggests that there is a significant correlation between use of cycle helmets and reduction in adjusted mortality and morbidity associated with TBI and facial injury.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document