The delivery of thrombi-specific nanoparticles incorporating oligonucleotides into injured cerebrovascular endothelium

Biomaterials ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (16) ◽  
pp. 4128-4136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Shi ◽  
Heng Mei ◽  
Jun Deng ◽  
Chen Chen ◽  
Huafang Wang ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Szmydynger-Chodobska ◽  
Brian J Zink ◽  
Adam Chodobski

Previous studies have indicated that the primary targets for vasopressin actions on the injured brain are the cerebrovascular endothelium and astrocytes, and that vasopressin amplifies the posttraumatic production of proinflammatory mediators. Here, the controlled cortical impact model of traumatic brain injury in rats was used to identify the sources of vasopressin in the injured brain. Injury increased vasopressin synthesis in the hypothalamus and cerebral cortex adjacent to the posttraumatic lesion. In the cortex, vasopressin was predominantly produced by activated microglia/macrophages, and, to a lesser extent, by the cerebrovascular endothelium. These data further support the pathophysiological role of vasopressin in brain injury.


2004 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. S523
Author(s):  
Richard E. Fine ◽  
Patricia B. Eisenhauer ◽  
Kelly J. Conn ◽  
Ann McKee ◽  
Rosemary Garrett-Young ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christer Owman ◽  
Jan Erik Hardebo

1991 ◽  
Vol 261 (2) ◽  
pp. H531-H537 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Ogura ◽  
M. Takayasu ◽  
R. G. Dacey

The differential effects of intraluminal and extraluminal application of endothelin, the endothelium-derived constricting factor, were studied in isolated intracerebral arterioles that were cannulated and perfused in vitro. Extraluminal and intraluminal application of 10(-8) M endothelin constricted the arterioles to 38.2 +/- 6.7 and 75.1 +/- 5.7% of the control diameter, respectively. Constrictions induced by either the intraluminal or the extraluminal application of endothelin were inhibited in a Ca(2+)-free solution. Nimodipine attenuated, but did not completely abolish, the constriction induced by the extraluminal application of endothelin, but it did abolish the constriction induced by the intraluminal application. The duration of vasoconstriction also differed between intra- and extraluminal application. Vessel diameter quickly returned to the control value as soon as intraluminal perfusion of endothelin was terminated. In contrast, the constriction induced by extraluminal application of endothelin lasted much longer and was difficult to reverse. The differential effect of intraluminal and extraluminal endothelin application appears to reflect the important barrier-function of the cerebrovascular endothelium of intracerebral arterioles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document