Neuronal in vitro activity is more sensitive to valproate than intracellular ATP: Considerations on conversion problems of IC50 in vitro data for animal replacement

ABSTRACT A broth microdilution method performed in accordance with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines was used to compare the in vitro activity of the new antifungal triazole SCH 56592 (SCH) to that of fluconazole (FLC), itraconazole (ITC), and ketoconazole (KETO) against 257 clinical yeast isolates. They included 220 isolates belonging to 12 different species of Candida, 15 isolates each of Cryptococcus neoformans andSaccharomyces cerevisiae, and seven isolates ofRhodotorula rubra. The MICs of SCH at which 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of the isolates were inhibited were 0.06 and 2.0 μg/ml, respectively. In general, SCH was considerably more active than FLC (MIC50 and MIC90 of 1.0 and 64 μg/ml, respectively) and slightly more active than either ITC (MIC50 and MIC90 of 0.25 and 2.0 μg/ml, respectively) and KETO (MIC50 and MIC90 of 0.125 and 4.0 μg/ml, respectively). Our in vitro data suggest that SCH has significant potential for clinical development.

Download Full-text

706. In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime–Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against MDR Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected in Latin America During the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program 2016–2017

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofz360.774 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. S318-S319

Author(s):

Sibylle Lob ◽

Krystyna Kazmierczak ◽

Gregory Stone ◽

Daniel F Sahm

Keyword(s):

Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽

Latin America ◽

Vitro Activity ◽

Surveillance Program ◽

In Vitro Activity ◽

Effective Treatment Option ◽

Class D ◽

Inhibitor Combination ◽

In Vitro Data

Abstract Background Ceftazidime–avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a β-lactam/non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination that can inhibit class A, C and some class D β-lactamases. Resistance caused by these β-lactamases often results in multidrug-resistance (MDR). This study evaluated the in vitro activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against MDR Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from patients in Latin America. Methods Nonduplicate clinical isolates were collected in 2016–2017 in 6 countries in Latin America. Susceptibility testing was performed using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI 2019 and FDA (tigecycline) breakpoints. MDR was defined as nonsusceptible (NS) (intermediate or resistant) to ≥3 of 7 sentinel drugs: amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, levofloxacin, colistin, meropenem, and piperacillin–tazobactam. Results The activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against all isolates and MDR subsets is shown in the table. MDR rates ranged from 28.4% among E. cloacae to 41.5% among K. pneumoniae. CAZ-AVI was active against >97% of Enterobacteriaceae isolates and maintained activity against >92% of MDR isolates of the examined species. No other tested drug consistently exceeded this activity. Among P. aeruginosa, CAZ-AVI was active against 87% of all isolates and 63% of MDR isolates; only colistin was more active. The two most common MDR phenotypes among Enterobacteriaceae were (1) NS to aztreonam, cefepime, and levofloxacin (n = 580, 41% of all MDR Enterobacteriaceae; 100% susceptible to CAZ-AVI) and (2) NS to aztreonam, cefepime, levofloxacin, and piperacillin–tazobactam (n = 301, 21% of all MDR isolates; 99.7% susceptible to CAZ-AVI). The two most common MDR phenotypes among P. aeruginosa were (1) NS to all sentinel drugs except colistin (n = 154, 33% of all MDR isolates; 30.5% susceptible to CAZ-AVI) and (2) NS to all drugs except colistin and amikacin (n = 97, 21% of all MDR isolates; 70.1% susceptible to CAZ-AVI). Conclusion These in vitro data suggest that CAZ-AVI can be an effective treatment option for infections caused by MDR Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa collected in Latin America. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Download Full-text

1244. In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected in Latin America During the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program 2018-2019

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1436 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S711-S711

Author(s):

Sibylle Lob ◽

Meredith Hackel ◽

Gregory Stone ◽

Daniel F Sahm

Keyword(s):

Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽

Latin America ◽

Vitro Activity ◽

Surveillance Program ◽

In Vitro Activity ◽

Effective Treatment Option ◽

Independent Contractor ◽

Class D ◽

In Vitro Data

Abstract Background Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a β-lactam/non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination that can inhibit class A, C, and some class D β-lactamases. Resistance caused by these β-lactamases often results in multidrug-resistance (MDR). This study evaluated the in vitro activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from patients in Latin America. Methods Non-duplicate clinical isolates were collected in 2018-2019 in 10 countries in Latin America. Susceptibility testing was performed using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI 2021 and FDA (tigecycline) breakpoints. MDR was defined as resistant (R) to ≥3 of 7 sentinel drugs: amikacin (AMK), aztreonam (ATM), cefepime (FEP), colistin (CST), levofloxacin (LVX), meropenem (MEM), and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). Results The activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against all isolates and MDR subsets is shown in the table. MDR rates for the studied species ranged from 16.3% among E. cloacae to 35.7% among K. pneumoniae. CAZ-AVI was active against 98% of Enterobacterales isolates and maintained activity against 74-98% of MDR isolates of the examined Enterobacterales species. Only tigecycline showed higher activity. Among P. aeruginosa, CAZ-AVI was active against 87% of all isolates and 47% of MDR isolates; no other studied drug was more active. The three most common MDR phenotypes among Enterobacterales were 1) R to ATM, FEP, and LVX (n=544, 44.8% of all MDR Enterobacterales; 100% susceptible (S) to CAZ-AVI), 2) R to ATM, FEP, LVX, and TZP (n=150, 12.4% of all MDR Enterobacterales; 99.3% S to CAZ-AVI), and 3) R to all sentinel drugs except AMK and CST (n=145, 11.9% of all MDR isolates; 78.6% S to CAZ-AVI). The three most common MDR phenotypes among P. aeruginosa were 1) R to all sentinel drugs except CST (n=85, 19.7% of all MDR isolates; 24.7% S to CAZ-AVI), 2) R to all sentinel drugs except AMK and CST (n=42, 9.7% of all MDR isolates; 66.7% S to CAZ-AVI), and 3) R to AMK, LVX, and MEM (n=37, 8.6% of all MDR isolates; 24.3% S to CAZ-AVI). Conclusion These in vitro data suggest that CAZ-AVI can be an effective treatment option for infections caused by MDR Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa collected in Latin America. Disclosures Sibylle Lob, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Meredith Hackel, PhD MPH, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Gregory Stone, PhD, AztraZeneca (Shareholder, Former Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Employee) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor)

Download Full-text

1571. In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected in Latin America During the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program 2017-2018

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1751 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S784-S785

Author(s):

Krystyna Kazmierczak ◽

Sibylle Lob ◽

Greg Stone ◽

Daniel F Sahm

Keyword(s):

Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽

Latin America ◽

Vitro Activity ◽

Surveillance Program ◽

In Vitro Activity ◽

Effective Treatment Option ◽

Independent Contractor ◽

Class D ◽

In Vitro Data

Abstract Background Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a β-lactam/non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination that can inhibit class A, C and some class D β-lactamases. Resistance caused by these β-lactamases often results in multidrug-resistance (MDR). This study evaluated the in vitro activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from patients in Latin America. Methods Non-duplicate clinical isolates were collected in 2017-2018 in 10 countries in Latin America. Susceptibility testing was performed using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI 2020 and FDA (tigecycline) breakpoints. MDR was defined as resistant (R) to ≥3 of 7 sentinel drugs: amikacin (AMK), aztreonam (ATM), cefepime (FEP), colistin (CST), levofloxacin (LVX), meropenem (MEM), and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). Results The activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against all isolates and MDR subsets is shown in the table. MDR rates for the studied species ranged from 17.6% among E. cloacae to 31.0% among K. pneumoniae. CAZ-AVI was active against 99% of Enterobacterales isolates and maintained activity against 85-99% of MDR isolates of the examined species. Only tigecycline showed comparable or higher activity. Among P. aeruginosa, CAZ-AVI was active against 86% of all isolates and 45% of MDR isolates; no other studied drug was more active. The three most common MDR phenotypes among Enterobacterales were 1) R to ATM, FEP, and LVX (n=538, 50% of all MDR Enterobacterales; 100% susceptible (S) to CAZ-AVI), 2) R to all sentinel drugs except AMK and CST (n=112, 10% of all MDR isolates; 88% S to CAZ-AVI), and 3) R to ATM, FEP, LVX, and TZP (n=111, 10% of all MDR Enterobacterales; 100% S to CAZ-AVI). The three most common MDR phenotypes among P. aeruginosa were 1) R to all sentinel drugs except CST (n=70, 22% of all MDR isolates; 20% S to CAZ-AVI), 2) R to AMK, LVX, and MEM (n=33, 10% of all MDR isolates; 33% S to CAZ-AVI), and 3) R to all sentinel drugs except AMK and CST (n=30, 9% of all MDR isolates; 70% S to CAZ-AVI). Table Conclusion These in vitro data suggest that CAZ-AVI can be an effective treatment option for infections caused by MDR Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa collected in Latin America. Disclosures Krystyna Kazmierczak, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant) Sibylle Lob, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant) Greg Stone, PhD, AztraZeneca (Shareholder, Former Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Employee) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant)Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Independent Contractor)

Download Full-text