8049 Background: Complete response in AL is defined as normal FLC ratio with negative serum and urine immunofixation. It is not clear if high involved serum FLC (hIFLC) in a patient with normal ratio may contribute to ongoing amyloid formation and hence affect outcomes. Methods: Data of 1308 patients (pts) with systemic AL seen within 90 days of diagnosis, at Mayo Clinic between 2006-2015, was analyzed retrospectively. Among these, 369 pts had 2 consecutive normal FLC ratio values after 1st line treatment and form the study population. Log rank test was used to estimate survival differences. Results: Among these 369 pts, pts with hIFLC at 1streading of normal FLC ratio (hIFLC1; n=170; 46.1%) were compared to those who did not (n=199; 53.9%). At diagnosis, the median age [61.5 vs 60.8 years (y); p=0.2], proportion of males (62.4 vs 58.3%; p=0.4), percentage of pts with renal involvement (73.5 vs 64.8%; p=0.07), in mayo stage I / II / III / IV (32.9% / 23%/ 27.3% / 16.8% vs 43.6 %/ 22.9% / 18.1% / 15.4%; p=0.1), with bone marrow plasma cells >10% (24.2 vs 30%; p=0.2) and with presence of t(11; 14)(48.4 vs 60; p=0.08) was similar, while cardiac (67.5 vs 53.3%; p=0.006) and hepatic (18.2 vs 9.1%; p=0.01) involvement was higher in hIFLC1 group. The median follow-up from diagnosis was 6.1 y (95% CI; 5.6, 6.8). The median progression free survival (PFS) in pts who had hIFLC1 was lower than for those who did not; 2.6 y (95% CI; 1.9, 4.5) vs 5.2 y (95% CI; 4.6, 6.4), p<0.0001, as was the median overall survival [OS; 6.7 y (95% CI; 4.5, 8.3) vs not reached (NR), p<0.0001]. We performed a more stringent comparison for pts with 2 consecutive hIFLC values (hIFLC2; n=112; 30.4%) versus not (n=257; 69.6%). The median PFS (3.2 y; 95%CI; 2.2, 4.5 vs 5.6 y; 95% CI; 4.7, 7.1; p<0.0001) and OS (7.8 y; 95% CI; 6.4, NR vs NR; 95%CI; 9.5, NR; p<0.0001) were significantly reduced in pts with hIFLC2 versus not as well. A multivariate analysis confirmed an impact of hIFLC1 and hIFLC2 on PFS/OS independent of serum creatinine. Conclusions: In pts with systemic AL, persistent elevation of the involved FLC predicts for poor prognosis (independent of serum creatinine) even among those who achieved normal FLC ratio after 1st line treatment.