11514 Background: Hormone receptor positive patents historically had a better prognosis than their receptor negative counterparts when other parameters are balanced. However not all the patients expressing Estrogen and progesterone respond well to the hormonal manipulation. Therefore we thought of doing a retrospective analysis of our hospital data to find out the differences in the prognostic factors in therapy responders and non responders. Methods: The study was conducted at tertiary care cancer center from India. Between 2002–2003 a total of 120 breast cancer patients who expressed either Estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) were analyzed. Only patients with metastatic breast cancer were analyzed. The patients were treated with our standard institutional protocol at the beginning according to the stage of the disease. The details and baseline characters were shown in table . Results: The responders tend to be post menopausal, having low grade, node negative tumors, expressed both ER and PR, and had long interval from the date of initial diagnosis. However tumor size and the site of metastasis (visceral vs. non visceral) did not alter the outcome to hormone therapy. Conclusion: patients who are having higher age, lower tumor grade, lower number of nodes, longer disease free interval after adjuvant therapy and expressing both receptors tend to respond to hormone therapy better than those who had the opposite characters. However as thought earlier, presence of visceral metastasis or larger tumors at the time of initial diagnosis dose not preclude response to hormonal manipulation. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Totally implantable venous access port systems and associated complications: A single-institution retrospective analysis of 2,996 breast cancer patients
