A prognostic gene signature for predicting survival outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 252-253 ◽  
pp. 87-95
Author(s):  
Santosh Khanal ◽  
Todd Bradley
Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2984-2984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiraz Fidai ◽  
Madina Sukhanova ◽  
Brian C.-H. Chiu ◽  
Y. Lynn Lynn Wang ◽  
Wendy Stock ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Richter transformation (RT), also known as Richter syndrome, is a rare complication of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) that has an aggressive clinical course and unfavorable prognosis. The majority of these transformations occur in the form of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and less frequently in the form of prolymphocytic leukemia (PLL), or classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). We examined a series of RT cases with available CLL/SLL data diagnosed at our institution between 2000 and 2018 to identify clinical/biologic characteristics associated with adverse outcome. Design: After searching our pathology archives between the years 2000-2018, we identified a total of 83 RT cases: 75 DLBCL-RT (including 7 PLL-RT) and 8 cHL-RT. For the purposes of this study, we focused only on DLBCL-RT cases. All clinical, demographic, and pathologic data including cytogenetics (karyotype and FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and flow cytometry were collected. Data points included age, gender, CLL/SLL histology (typical vs. atypical), CD5, CD38, ZAP-70 status, CLL karyotype, FISH [chromosomes 11q (ATM), trisomy 12, 13q, 14 (IGH), 17p(P53)]. In addition, time to transformation (months), site of transformation, transformation biopsy characteristics (germinal center vs. non-germinal center, CD5 status, along with MYC and BCL2 IHC status), and karyotype at transformation were collected. For the current analysis , karyotype and FISH data were dichotomized into (complex vs. non-complex) or (abnormality present vs. absent) respectively. Limited CLL treatment data was also collected but details on performance status, stage and IPI at transformation were not available. The clinical end point was overall survival (OS) determined as age at the time of transformation to death due to any cause, censoring patients without an event at last follow-up. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were derived from Cox proportional hazards regression models. Data analyses were performed using Stata®11. Results: Among DLBCL-RT patients, the median age at transformation was 66 years (range: 43-95). 87% of cases had antecedent CLL with a typical phenotype (CD5+, CD23+, FMC7-), 66% of CLL cases expressed CD38 (flow > 20% positivity) and 77% were positive for ZAP-70 (IHC). There was no correlation between CD38 expression and ZAP-70 (p=0.7). Fifty-three percent of the CLL cases harbored a complex karyotype. The most frequent abnormalities detected by FISH were TP53 aberrations (39%), followed by del13q (37%), Trisomy 12 (33%), IGH breaks (21%) and 11q/ATM deletion (17%). Transformation occurred at median of 59 months (0-352 range) after CLL diagnosis. DLBCL-RT was non-germinal center B-cell phenotype in 85% (n=27) of cases, with variable expression of CD5 (61%), p53 (50%), MYC (83%) and BCL2 (90%). EBER was infrequent at transformation (4%; n=23). Among DLBCL-RT, a total of 29 patients died at a median of 6 months (0-58 months) after RT diagnosis. In univariate analysis, age at transformation, type of CLL (typical vs. atypical), site (nodal vs. extranodal), CLL CD38 or ZAP-70 expression did not impact survival outcome. Only TP53 aberrations by FISH in antecendent CLL (p=0.02) (Figure 1) and the presence of complex karyotype at transformation were associated with adverse survival outcome (p=0.004) (Figure 2). MYC and/or BCL2 genetic alterations at transformation did not impact outcome. In a multivariable Cox model including both CLL TP53 aberrations and complex karyotype at transformation, only complex karyotype at transformation is weakly associated with outcome (p=0.09; hazard ratio 0.14 [0.015-1.36]; 95% CI) although this analysis is limited by the number of available patients with complete data (n=17). Conclusion: DLBCL-RT from an underlying CLL has a poor survival outcome and only TP53 alterations in the CLL and complex karyotype at transformation impacted survival. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Stock: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Riedell:Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Smith:BMS: Consultancy; Portola: Honoraria.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Issa Ismail Issa ◽  
Rasmus Froberg Brøndum ◽  
Hanne Due ◽  
Linnéa Schmidt ◽  
Martin Bøgsted ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Park ◽  
Boram Han ◽  
Jae Won Cho ◽  
Sook-young Woo ◽  
Seonwoo Kim ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 616-616
Author(s):  
Jose M. Polo ◽  
Przemyslaw Juszczynski ◽  
Leandro Cerchietti ◽  
Stefano Monti ◽  
Kenny Ye ◽  
...  

Abstract Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common lymphoid malignancy, is a heterogeneous disease. These tumors are thought to arise from normal antigen-exposed B-cells that have migrated to or through the germinal center (GC). Structural abnormalities of the BCL6 locus (chromosomal translocation and aberrant somatic hypermutation) are the most common genetic abnormalities in DLBCL, occurring in over a third of these tumors. We recently developed a potent and specific BCL6 peptide inhibitor (BPI) that disrupts the interaction between BCL6 and the SMRT co-repressor complex. BPI was cytotoxic against some, but not all, BCL6 positive primary DLBCLs and DLBCL cell lines, indicating that a subset of DLBCLs was particularly dependent on BCL6 for their survival. We predicted that such cases might be identified through a specific BCL6-dependent gene signature and utilized ChIP on chip and a 24,000 promoter genomic microarray to identify BCL6 target genes. In these studies, BCL6 bound to 431 loci. Eighty percent of these candidate target genes contained a canonical BCL6 binding site and 85% of analyzed candidates were confirmed using quantitative single-locus CHIP. GO term enrichment revealed that BCL6 targets were significantly more likely to be genes associated with transcription, ubiquitylation, response to DNA damage, cell cycle and chromatin assembly/disassembly (FDR <.05). We predicted that coordinate regulation of the BCL6 targets would serve as a signature of BCL6 activity. For this reason, we asked whether the BCL6 target gene set was differentially expressed in the recently described DLBCL comprehensive clusters, “B-cell Receptor/Proliferation (BCR),” “Oxidative Phosphorylation (OxPhos),” and Host Response (HR),” using 2 large series of primary DLBCLs with available transcriptional profiles. Since HR tumors are largely defined by infiltrating host inflammatory cells, we focused on BCR and OxPhos DLBCLs. Of interest, BCR tumors more frequently exhibit BCL6 chromosomal translocations and increased BCL6 expression. Consistent with these observations, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed highly significant differential expression of BCL6 target genes in BCR vs. OxPhos tumors (p <.0001). In contrast, GSEA of the BCL6 targets in the same DLBCLs sorted into developmental cell-of-origin groups was not significant (“GC” vs. “ABC”/”Other”, p =.25 and “GC” vs. “ABC” only, p =.082). To assess the functional significance of the BCL6 signature in the DLBCL consensus clusters, we generated a predictive algorithm based on the transcriptional profiles of a series of DLBCL cell lines to assign the lines to BCR, OxPhos or HR comprehensive clusters. Five BCR and 3 OxPhos DLBCL cell lines were selected for additional blinded functional analyses. BPI treatment upregulated BCL6 target gene expression in BCR, but not OxPhos, DLBCLs. Furthermore, BPI was significantly more effective in BCR lines than OxPhos DLBCLs (BPI IC50s of BCR vs. Ox Phos lines, 12.7±1.7 μM vs 48.9±2.6 μM, respectively, p<. 0001). Taken together, the data indicate that BCR DLBCLs are significantly more dependent on BCL6 transcriptional repression and more sensitive to targeted BCL6 inhibition. More generally, these studies suggest that DLBCL comprehensive cluster designation will help guide the targeted therapy of biologically discrete DLBCL subsets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document