Patient representativeness of a peripheral artery disease cohort in a randomized control trial versus a real-world cohort: The CLEVER trial versus the PORTRAIT registry

2021 ◽  
pp. 106624
Author(s):  
Lindsey E. Scierka ◽  
Qurat-ul-ain Jelani ◽  
Kim G. Smolderen ◽  
Kensey Gosch ◽  
John A. Spertus ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suveen Angraal ◽  
Vittal Hejjaji ◽  
Laith Derbas ◽  
Manesh R Patel ◽  
Jan Heyligers ◽  
...  

Background: In patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD), a key treatment goal is to improve their health status; their symptoms, function, and quality of life (QoL). While medical therapy with lifestyle changes is recommended in all, revascularization can be a consideration to alleviate PAD symptoms. We sought to compare the real-world impact of either treatment strategy on patients’ health status improvement. Methods: Patients with new or worsening PAD symptoms (Rutherford category 1-3), from 10 U.S. specialty vascular clinics between 2011-2015, who either underwent early revascularization (using stent, angioplasty or surgery within 3 months of enrolment) or medical management alone (statin, aspirin, cilostazol, supervised exercise therapy, risk factor (diabetes, hypertension) management) were identified from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Related to Treatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Investigating Trajectories (PORTRAIT) registry. The Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ) was used to assess patients’ disease-specific health status at enrollment and at 3, 6 and 12 months of follow up. The differences in PAQ overall summary scores, and each subdomain, were compared using an adjusted generalized linear model for repeated measures (Figure 1). Results: Among 797 patients (mean age of 68.6 years, 58.1% male), 226 underwent early revascularization and 571 were managed medically. At baseline, patients in the revascularization vs. medical management cohort had lower PAQ summary scores (mean ± SD; 42.6 ± 20.7 vs. 48.5 ± 22.3, P<0.001) and QoL scores (43.4 ± 23.9 vs. 50.4 ± 26.4, P<0.001). Over 1 year of follow-up, patients who underwent revascularization reported significantly higher health status over time than patients managed medically without revascularization (P <0.001 for all PAQ sub-domains; Figure 1). Conclusion: Patients with PAD who received early revascularization had worse health status at baseline, but they reported a greater degree of improvement over 1 year of follow-up when compared to patients managed medically without revascularization. Summarizing real-world health status benefits following a PAD diagnosis is critical to help guide preference-sensitive decisions on PAD management.


2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 928
Author(s):  
Matthew Pichert ◽  
Qurat-ul-ain Jelani ◽  
Yulanka Castro Dominguez ◽  
Jiaming Huang ◽  
Sameer Nagpal ◽  
...  

VASA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisato Takagi ◽  
Takuya Umemoto

Abstract. Both coronary and peripheral artery disease are representative atherosclerotic diseases, which are also known to be positively associated with presence of abdominal aortic aneurysm. It is still controversial, however, whether coronary and peripheral artery disease are positively associated with expansion and rupture as well as presence of abdominal aortic aneurysm. In the present article, we overviewed epidemiological evidence, i. e. meta-analyses, regarding the associations of coronary and peripheral artery disease with presence, expansion, and rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm through a systematic literature search. Our exhaustive search identified seven meta-analyses, which suggest that both coronary and peripheral artery disease are positively associated with presence of abdominal aortic aneurysm, may be negatively associated with expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysm, and might be unassociated with rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document