Modification of glass ionomer cement by incorporating nanozirconia-hydroxyapatite-silica nano-powder composite by the one-pot technique for hardness and aesthetics improvement

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (16) ◽  
pp. 13247-13253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismail Ab Rahman ◽  
Nor Ainon Maziah Ghazali ◽  
Wan Zaripah Wan Bakar ◽  
Sam'an Malik Masudi
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 299-308
Author(s):  
Imran Alam Moheet ◽  
Norhayati Luddin ◽  
Ismail Ab Rahman ◽  
Sam’an Malik Masudi ◽  
Thirumulu Ponnuraj Kannan ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to synthesize and characterize nano-hydroxyapatite-silica (nano-HA-Si) particle, followed by the evaluation of surface roughness and sol-sorption property of conventional glass ionomer cement (cGIC) with the addition of nano-HA-Si. Nano-HA-Si was synthesized by one-pot sol–gel technique. It was then characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscope, and transmission electron microscope. Experimental nano-HA-Si–added GIC (nano-HA-Si-GIC) was prepared by adding 10% by weight ratio of nano-HA-Si to cGIC powder. The surface roughness of the samples was analyzed using tactile profilometer. Mass stabilization techniques were used to assess sol-sorption. The 10% nano-HA-Si-GIC samples were successfully fabricated. Nano-HA-Si-GIC reported lower surface roughness (0.13 ± 0.01 μm) as compared to cGIC (0.16 ± 0.03 μm). Nano-HA-Si-GIC reported an increase in sol-sorption when compared to cGIC. Incorporation of nano-HA-Si into the formulation of cGIC enhances their physical properties and with slight increase in sol-sorption property. Nano-HA-Si-GIC has the ability to enhance the characteristics of glass ionomer dental restorative materials. Hence, it can be suggested as a potential future restorative material in dentistry.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marrwa A. Ibrahim ◽  
Balasankar Meera Priyadarshini ◽  
Jennifer Neo ◽  
Amr S. Fawzy

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Maryam Saadat ◽  
Marzieh Moradian ◽  
Babak Mirshekari

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to which bacterial cellulose nanocrystals (BCNs) were added. BCNs were incorporated into the RMGIC powder in ratios of 0.3%, 0.5%, and 1% (w/w). One control and three experimental groups were enrolled in the study: unmodified RMGIC (control), 0.3% (w/w) BCN-modified RMGIC, 0.5% (w/w) BCN-modified RMGIC, and 1% (w/w) BCN-modified RMGIC. The surface hardness and surface roughness were the parameters assessed. The materials were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The data were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis tests for surface hardness and roughness, respectively. The addition of BCN resulted in the improvement of surface roughness in all the specimens compared with the control material. The RMGIC modified by 1% (w/w) BCN showed the lowest surface roughness (decreased by 52%) among all tested groups. However, BCN had a negative effect on the surface hardness of RMGIC. The group with 0.3% (w/w) BCN had the least decrease in microhardness (13%). According to the results, the RMGIC group modified by 1% (w/w) BCN had a smoother surface than the other groups. The surface microhardness of the RMGIC decreased after BCNs were added to it.


Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (17) ◽  
pp. 4964
Author(s):  
Ana Ivanišević ◽  
Valentina Brzović Rajić ◽  
Ana Pilipović ◽  
Matej Par ◽  
Hrvoje Ivanković ◽  
...  

The aim of this research was to investigate the compressive strength (CS), breaking strength (BS), and compressive modulus (CM) of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) modified with TiO2 nano particles, marine-derived hydroxyapatite (md-HAp) microparticles (<45 µm), and a combination of TiO2 NP and md-HAp particles. The materials used in the study were conventional GIC Fuji IX GP Extra (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), TiO2 powder P25 (Degussa, Essen, Germany), and HAp synthesized from cuttlefish bone and ground in a mortar to obtain md-HAp powder. md-HAp was characterized using FTIR and SEM analysis. There were four groups of GIC samples: (i) Fuji IX control group, (ii) powder modified with 3 wt% TiO2, (iii) powder modified with 3 wt% HAp, and (iv) powder modified with 1.5 wt% TiO2 + 1.5 wt% HAp. Measurements were performed in a universal testing machine, and CS, BS, and CM were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Tukey’s tests. CS, BS, and CM differed significantly between the Fuji IX control group and all experimental groups while differences between the experimental groups were not statistically significant. The addition of TiO2 NP, md-HAp micro-sized particles, and a combination of TiO2 and md-HAp reduced the CS, BS, and CM of conventional GICs when mixed at the powder/liquid (p/l) ratio recommended by the manufacturer.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ika Dewi Ana

AbstractHybridization of resin modified- glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and bioactive glass (BAG) may result higher mechanical strength and resistance to disintegration, while less contain of polyacrylic acid would lead to bioactivity of the cement. In the present study we investigated the effect of BAG from the CaSiO3-Ca3(PO4)2 system addition to the bioactivity of RMGIC. The BAG containing 10, 15, and 20% of P2O5 (denoted as CSP10, 15, and 20) were used in the study to modify the powder of RMGIC, with apatite wollastonite (AWG) was chosen for a comparison. The surface bioactivity was assessed using XRD, FT-IR, and SEM analysis after specimen immersion in the simulated body fluid (SBF). Measurement of Ca, P, F, Sr, and Al was conducted for the remaining SBF. Cells studies were done to evaluate cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation on the RMGIC containing BAG compared to the one without BAG. Results of Sr and Al analysis lead to the conclusion that addition of BAG may not influence stability of the matrix of the cement. It was also confirmed that addition of bioactive glass was positive factor indicating excellent ions exchange in SBF and spontaneous growth of apatite by consuming the Ca and P ions in the surrounding fluid. The ability of osteoblasts differentiation on the four types of bioactive cements were higher than that of RMGIC without BAG. These results might provide novel insights into the development of a new generation of osteoconductive biomedical materials.


2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
ISMAIL AB RAHMAN ◽  
SAM’AN MALIK MASUDI ◽  
NORHAYATI LUDDIN ◽  
RAYEES AHMAD SHIEKH

2019 ◽  
pp. 61-67
Author(s):  
Xuan Anh Ngoc Ho ◽  
Anh Chi Phan ◽  
Toai Nguyen

Background: Class II restoration with zirconia inlay is concerned by numerous studies about the luting coupling between zirconia inlay and teeth. The present study was performed to evaluate the microleakage of Class II zirconia inlayusing two different luting agents and compare to direct restoration using bulk fill composite. Aims: To evaluate the microleakage of Class II restorations using three different techniques. Materials and methods: The study was performed in laboratory with three groups. Each of thirty extracted human teeth was prepared a class II cavity with the same dimensions, then these teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups restored by 3 different approaches. Group 1: zirconia inlay cemented with self-etch resin cement (Multilink N); Group 2: zirconia inlay cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji Plus); Group 3: direct composite restoration using bulk fill composite(Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill). All restorations were subjected to thermal cycling (100 cycles 50C – 55 0C), then immersed to 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. The microleakage determined by the extent of dye penetration along the gingival wall was assessed using two methods: quantitative and semi-quantitative method. Results: Among three types of restorations, group 1 demonstrated the significantly lower rate of leakage compared to the others, while group 2 and 3 showed no significant difference. Conclusion: Zirconia inlay restoration cemented with self-etch resin cement has least microleakage degree when compare to class II zirconia inlay restoration cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and direct composite restoration using bulk fill composite. Key words: inlay, zirconia ceramic, class II restoration, microleakage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document