scholarly journals Closing the gap: the real-world risk of serious infections with vedolizumab in comparison to anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease.

Author(s):  
Waseem Ahmed ◽  
Frank I. Scott
2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-96-S-97
Author(s):  
Laura E. Targownik ◽  
Aruni Tennakoon ◽  
Charles N. Bernstein ◽  
Harminder Singh ◽  
Eric I. Benchimol ◽  
...  

Gut ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 59 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A3.3-A4 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Hunter ◽  
S James ◽  
D Chan ◽  
B Stacey ◽  
M Stroud ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. e100337
Author(s):  
Vivek Ashok Rudrapatna ◽  
Benjamin Scott Glicksberg ◽  
Atul Janardhan Butte

ObjectivesElectronic health records (EHR) are receiving growing attention from regulators, biopharmaceuticals and payors as a potential source of real-world evidence. However, their suitability for the study of diseases with complex activity measures is unclear. We sought to evaluate the use of EHR data for estimating treatment effectiveness in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), using tofacitinib as a use case.MethodsRecords from the University of California, San Francisco (6/2012 to 4/2019) were queried to identify tofacitinib-treated IBD patients. Disease activity variables at baseline and follow-up were manually abstracted according to a preregistered protocol. The proportion of patients meeting the endpoints of recent randomised trials in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) was assessed.Results86 patients initiated tofacitinib. Baseline characteristics of the real-world and trial cohorts were similar, except for universal failure of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in the former. 54% (UC) and 62% (CD) of patients had complete capture of disease activity at baseline (month −6 to 0), while only 32% (UC) and 69% (CD) of patients had complete follow-up data (month 2 to 8). Using data imputation, we estimated the proportion achieving the trial primary endpoints as being similar to the published estimates for both UC (16%, p value=0.5) and CD (38%, p-value=0.8).Discussion/ConclusionThis pilot study reproduced trial-based estimates of tofacitinib efficacy despite its use in a different cohort but revealed substantial missingness in routinely collected data. Future work is needed to strengthen EHR data and enable real-world evidence in complex diseases like IBD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S59-S59
Author(s):  
Sumona Bhattacharya ◽  
Beatriz Marciano ◽  
Harry Malech ◽  
Steven Holland ◽  
Suk See De Ravin ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is a rare immunodeficiency caused by mutations in the NADPH oxidase complex. Dysregulated immune function may cause inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients with CGD-associated IBD may not respond to or may develop serious infections as a result of traditional IBD therapies such as vedolizumab and infliximab. Ustekinumab is approved for use in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis however there is scarce data on its efficacy and safety in CGD. Aims To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab for CGD-associated IBD. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted on CGD patients followed at a single center who had consented to participate in a natural history study. Clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic data were extracted in those that had received ustekinumab for IBD. Results Eight patients were found. Four were male and four were female. Five were white, one was Asian, one was black, and one was mixed race. Median age at diagnosis of CGD was 3 years (IQR 8) and of IBD was 15.5 years (IQR 20). Median age at initiation of ustekinumab was 27.5 years (IQR 14) and median duration on ustekinumab was 10 months (IQR 7). Six had colonic disease, two had ileocolonic disease, and six had perianal disease. Six failed other biologics (n=5 for vedolizumab, n=1 for infliximab, n=1 for adalimumab). Six patients symptomatically improved whereas two had no improvement. Changes in hemoglobin and C-reactive protein were equivocal. Three patients had improved endoscopic findings, two had unimproved findings, and three patients lacked this data. Overall, four patients achieved clinical remission. However, none of the five patients with endoscopic reevaluation achieved endoscopic remission. Three patients discontinued therapy due to lack of response: two required surgery and one underwent stem cell transplant. Fungal pneumonia (n=2), otitis media (n=1), oral herpes simplex virus 1 (n=1), and viral gastroenteritis (n=1) were reported. One infusion reaction occurred. Discussion In our cohort of eight patients with CGD-associated IBD receiving ustekinumab, results were mixed with four patients experiencing some degree of clinical or endoscopic improvement including four who achieved clinical remission. Multiple CGD-related variables may account for the mixed laboratory findings. Four of the five patients with endoscopic reevaluation had pre-existing strictures that would be unlikely to reverse with medical therapy alone. Of these, two had otherwise resolved endoscopic inflammation. Only two patients had no endoscopic improvement. Two serious infections occurred however CGD confers increased infectious susceptibility and no infections lead to discontinuation of therapy. Given these promising results, further formalized study of ustekinumab in CGD-associated IBD is needed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628482110106
Author(s):  
Fabio Salvatore Macaluso ◽  
Marcello Maida ◽  
Mauro Grova ◽  
Federica Crispino ◽  
Giulia Teresi ◽  
...  

During past years, the increasing knowledge of molecular mechanisms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have led to the development of several targeted biological therapies. This great expansion of available medical options has prompted the need for comparative data between drugs. For years, given that most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed only versus placebo, this demand has clashed with the absence of head-to-head trials comparing two or more treatments. The quality of evidence coming from real-world experience was low overall, so it was extremely difficult to clarify the correct positioning of the biologicals inside the therapeutic algorithms for IBD. Fortunately, times are changing: head-to-head comparative RCTs have been conducted or are ongoing, and the methodological quality of real-world studies is gradually increasing, mainly thanks to a higher rate of application of statistical methods capable of reducing the selection bias, such as the propensity score. In this evolving scenario, the increasing number of comparative RCTs is providing high-quality data for a correct drug positioning in IBD. In parallel, real-world observational studies are supporting the data coming from RCTs, and covering those comparisons not performed in the RCT setting. We believe that there is moderate evidence already available to support clinicians in the correct choice between different biologicals, and data will certainly be more robust in the near future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document