Are pharmaceuticals more harmful than other pollutants to aquatic invertebrate species: A hypothesis tested using multi-biomarker and multi-species responses in field collected and transplanted organisms

Chemosphere ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 85 (10) ◽  
pp. 1548-1554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joana Damásio ◽  
Damià Barceló ◽  
Rikke Brix ◽  
Cristina Postigo ◽  
Meritxell Gros ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 1517-1528 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Hans Baveco ◽  
Steve Norman ◽  
Ivo Roessink ◽  
Nika Galic ◽  
Paul J. Van den Brink

2002 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 1189-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor A Grigorovich ◽  
Hugh J MacIsaac ◽  
Nikolai V Shadrin ◽  
Edward L Mills

The Black, Azov, and Caspian sea drainages (i.e., Ponto-Caspian region) have an extensive and long history of species introductions. Here we review patterns and mechanisms of introductions of aquatic invertebrate species into these ecosystems. Since the late 1800s, 136 free-living and 27 parasitic invertebrate species have been introduced outside their native ranges and have established reproducing populations in the Ponto-Caspian region. The bulk of these introductions are represented by crustaceans (53%), flatworms (15%), and molluscs (13%). Most of the introduced species are native to other areas within the Ponto-Caspian region (37%), with other sizable contributions from the Atlantic–Mediterranean (15%) and boreal European–Siberian (14%) geographic regions. Mechanisms of introductions were dominated by deliberate releases (29%) and shipping activities (22%), with the former occurring principally in freshwater habitats and the latter in marine and estuarine ones. Other introductions resulted from unintentional release (21%) and hydrotechnical development (14%), notably the construction of reservoirs and canals. Global and regional trade, particularly that mediated by commercial ships, provides dispersal opportunities for nonindigenous invertebrates to and within the Ponto-Caspian region, rapidly changing the composition of its endemic fauna.


Author(s):  
David M. Stagliano ◽  
William R. Bosworth ◽  
George. Stephens ◽  
◽  

2002 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
V. V. Murina ◽  
Ye. V. Lisitskaya ◽  
V. K. Shalyapin

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 245-256
Author(s):  
Cemil Aymak ◽  
Aşkın Hasan Uçar ◽  
Yusuf Katılmış ◽  
Eyup Başkale ◽  
Serap Ergene

In this study invertebrate infestation in green turtle (Chelonia mydas) nests were recorded for the first time for Kazanlı beach, Mersin, Turkey. For this aim, in 2006 nesting season, 294 natural intact green turtle nests were sampled to examine their contents and invertebrate infestation was found in 76 (25.85% of the total sampling green turtle nests). These infested nests were examined in terms of the invertebrate faunal composition. The specimens found in the green sea turtle nests were identified to order, family or genus levels and they were represented in 5 orders. These invertebrate groups are Elater sp. larvae (Elateridae; Coleoptera), Pimelia sp. larvae (Tenebrionidae; Coleoptera), Enchytraeidae (Oligochaeta), Cyrptostigmata (Acari), Oniscidae (Isopoda), Formicidae (Hymenoptera). Elater sp. was the most common invertebrate group in the green turtle nests. According to student t test, we found statistically significant differences between 7 independent variables and invertebrate species presence. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis explained that there is a negative relationship between hatching success rate and invertebrate species presence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document