Conundrum: Who should care for the dermatologic needs of the medicaid patient? Facts and controversies

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 769-771
Author(s):  
Barry D. Kels ◽  
Jane M. Grant-Kels
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 755-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Lindauer ◽  
Jacob A. Powell ◽  
Brian C. Leypoldt ◽  
Eser Tufekci ◽  
Bhavna Shroff

Abstract Objective: To test the null hypothesis that the financial status of a patient's orthodontic contract and other patient and appointment characteristics have no influence on appointment attendance. Materials and Methods: During a 6-week period, the last appointment of each active, non-Medicaid patient (n = 538) was recorded as either kept or missed. The financial status of the patient's contract, age, sex, method by which the appointment was made, and the type of appointment scheduled were recorded. Associations between each of these factors and appointment attendance were evaluated using χ2 analysis. In the case of patients who missed their appointment, attendance at the subsequent reappointment was also evaluated. Results: The overall appointment failure rate was 12.3%. Males (16.2%) were significantly more likely than females (9.5%) to miss appointments (P = .02). Also, appointments made by postcard (28.2%) were more likely to be missed than those made in person (11.8%) or by phone (6.5%) (P = .003). The most significant factor affecting appointment attendance was the patient's financial status (P = .0001). Patients with accounts that were overdue (33.3%) or in collections (28.6%) were more likely to miss appointments than those whose accounts were current (10.5%). Of patients who missed their appointment (n = 66), 30% also missed the subsequent reappointment. Conclusions: The null hypothesis was rejected. Patients with delinquent financial accounts were three times as likely to miss an orthodontic appointment as those whose contracts were current. Increased rates of missed orthodontic appointments were also found for males, patients scheduled by mailing a postcard, and patients who had missed their previous appointment.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (20) ◽  
pp. 2569-2579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer W. Mack ◽  
Kun Chen ◽  
Francis P. Boscoe ◽  
Foster C. Gesten ◽  
Patrick J. Roohan ◽  
...  

Purpose Medicare patients with advanced cancer have low rates of hospice use. We sought to evaluate hospice use among patients in Medicaid, which insures younger and indigent patients, relative to those in Medicare. Patients and Methods Using linked patient-level data from California (CA) and New York (NY) state cancer registries, state Medicaid programs, NY Medicare, and CA Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare data, we identified 4,797 CA Medicaid patients and 4,001 NY Medicaid patients ages 21 to 64 years, as well as 27,416 CA Medicare patients and 16,496 NY Medicare patients ages ≥ 65 years who were diagnosed with stage IV lung cancer between 2002 and 2006. We evaluated hospice use, timing of enrollment, and location of death (inpatient hospice; long-term care facility or skilled nursing facility; acute care facility; home with hospice; or home without hospice). We used multiple logistic regressions to evaluate clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with hospice use. Results Although 53% (CA) and 44% (NY) of Medicare patients ages ≥ 65 years used hospice, fewer than one third of Medicaid-insured patients ages 21 to 64 years enrolled in hospice after a diagnosis of stage IV lung cancer (CA, 32%; NY, 24%). A minority of Medicaid patient deaths (CA, 19%; NY, 14%) occurred at home with hospice. Most Medicaid patient deaths were either in acute-care facilities (CA, 28%; NY, 36%) or at home without hospice (CA, 39%; NY, 41%). Patient race/ethnicity was not associated with hospice use among Medicaid patients. Conclusion Given low rates of hospice use among Medicaid enrollees and considerable evidence of suffering at the end of life, opportunities to improve palliative care delivery should be prioritized.


2018 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-59
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. C. Sukalski ◽  
Susan C. McKernan ◽  
Gustavo Avila‐Ortiz ◽  
Marsha A. Cunningham‐Ford ◽  
Fang Qian ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 570-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Richards ◽  
Brendan Saloner ◽  
Genevieve M. Kenney ◽  
Karin V. Rhodes ◽  
Daniel Polsky

2013 ◽  
Vol 02 (03) ◽  
pp. 74-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrienne M. Gilligan ◽  
Daniel C. Malone ◽  
Terri L. Warholak ◽  
Edward P. Armstrong

2015 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Hoerger ◽  
R. Perry ◽  
K. Farrell ◽  
S. Teixeira-Poit

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document