Response to letter received from Moore and Schug: Thakur et al. Impact of Prolonged-Release Oxycodone/Naloxone on Outcomes Affecting Patients׳ Daily Functioning in Comparison With Extended-Release Tapentadol: A Systematic Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 1867-1868
Author(s):  
Deepika Thakur ◽  
Sara Dickerson
2016 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Hemant Thacker ◽  
Rajeev Chawla ◽  
Navneet Agrawal ◽  
Rohit Kapoor ◽  
Noel Somasundaram ◽  
...  

Metabolism ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 65 (11) ◽  
pp. 1664-1678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amirhosssein Sahebkar ◽  
Željko Reiner ◽  
Luis E. Simental-Mendía ◽  
Gianna Ferretti ◽  
Arrigo F.G. Cicero

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S162-S162
Author(s):  
Anika Poppe ◽  
Leonie Bais ◽  
Franziska Ritter ◽  
Branislava Curčić-Blake ◽  
Gerdina (Marieke) Pijnenborg ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cognitive deficits are commonly observed in people diagnosed with schizophrenia and have been found to be more predictive of future daily and community functioning than the severity of clinical symptoms (e.g., hallucinations and delusions). Cognitive remediation (CR) is a psychological treatment developed to improve cognitive functioning and thereby daily functioning. Despite the effectivity of CR programs, reduced neuroplasticity in brain networks underlying the cognitive tasks may impede the effectiveness of these treatment programs. Increasing the neuroplasticity in these networks by the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) like transcranial direct current stimulation or transcranial magnetic stimulation might boost the effect of CR. In a systematic review, we will address the question whether the combination of non-invasive brain stimulation and cognitive remediation may be a promising treatment strategy. We will apply a transdiagnostic perspective in order to determine the potential benefit of combining CR and NIBS in general, and not specific to a diagnostic category. Methods A systematic review of literature was conducted by searching PsycINFO, Pubmed, Web of Science, and Medline databases for combined treatments of CR and NIBS. Included studies were assessed for cognitive, clinical and functional outcomes. Results 64 studies were identified, with 40 studies including clinical populations (e.g., schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease, HIV, MS). The cognitive outcomes showed mixed results. Most effects were found on complex attention and executive functioning. In these domains about 38% of the studies found an added positive treatment effect for combining interventions, in comparison to single interventions (i.e. CR, NIBS, or CR+sham-stimulation). Functional outcome measures were included in ten of the 40 studies with clinical populations. Eight studies found a positive trend towards greater improvements in daily functioning when CR and NIBS were combined. Discussion So far, findings indicate promising effects of combining CR and NIBS on cognitive functioning and daily functioning in healthy and various clinical populations. There is a lot of variety between studies (e.g., duration of treatment, number of total sessions, number of weekly sessions, cognitive domains targeted) which may explain the mixed results. Especially, the design of the CR varied widely. Strategy-use and targeting meta-cognition, which were identified as effective elements of CR as a stand-alone treatment were not included in many combined CR+NIBS designs. Future studies have to elucidate whether the combining CR (including strategy-use and meta-cognition) and NIBS has an additive effect on cognitive and/or daily functioning compared to non-combined treatment. Moreover, future studies should evaluate whether beneficial effects from the experimental studies translate into long-term improvement in activities of daily life.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Boesen ◽  
Karsten Juhl Jørgensen ◽  
Peter C Gøtzsche

Objective: To assess potential dose-response relationships of extended-release methylphenidate for ADHD in adults on efficacy outcomes. Study design and setting: Post-hoc analysis based on a systematic review of extended-release methylphenidate (https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012857). Using data from clinical trials comparing multiple fixed-dose methylphenidate groups with placebo, we conducted subgroup meta-analyses for available efficacy outcomes. Results and conclusion: Five trials used a fixed-dose design with multiple methylphenidate groups receiving different doses. All trials were pivotal industry sponsored studies conducted to obtain marketing authorisation. We analysed four efficacy outcomes: Self-rated ADHD symptoms (5 trials, 1807 participants), investigator-rated ADHD symptoms (5 trials, 1904 participants), quality of life (4 trials, 1158 participants), and peer-rated ADHD symptoms (2 trials, 879 participants). There were no dose-response relationships for any outcome.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen qi Zhang ◽  
◽  
Xueyang Bai ◽  
Yong Wan ◽  
Hongyan Li ◽  
...  

Review question / Objective: We aim to systematically examine and compare the efficacy, safety and retention rate of ER divalproex (VPA-ER) and conventional DR divalproex (VPA-DR) on patients with epilepsy. Condition being studied: To our knowledge, comparison and conversion studies about VPA-ER and conventional VPA-DR are lacked. Small-sample studies analyzing the safety and efficacy of VPA-ER in different populations remain controversial. Therefore, this study aims to systematically review the safety, efficacy and retention rate of VPA-ER and VPA-DR by meta-analysis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaud Del Bello ◽  
Clotilde Gaible ◽  
Nathalie Longlune ◽  
Anne-Laure Hebral ◽  
Laure Esposito ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Several formulations of tacrolimus are available, but evidence of the benefit of changing to the most recent formulations is lacking. Tacrolimus intra-patient variability (tacrolimus IPV) is an emerging risk factor associated with poor graft outcomes after solid organ transplantations. Here, we examined the modifications of tacrolimus IPV after switching to a different formulation of tacrolimus.Experimental Approach: We identified 353 solid organ transplant recipients that were switched in our center from immediate-release (IR-tacrolimus) or prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-tacrolimus) to extended-release, LCP-tacrolimus (LCP-tacrolimus). Among them, 54 patients underwent at least 3 available tacrolimus blood concentrations before and after the switch, allowing us to investigate tacrolimus IPV.Key Results: The switch was considered as a safe procedure since only four of the 353 patients presented a graft rejection after the switch, and no patient was hospitalized for tacrolimus overdose. The tacrolimus IPV estimated by the coefficient of variation (CV-IPV) was stable before and after the switch to LCP-tacrolimus (CV-IPV: 29.0% (IQR 25–75 (15.5; 38.5) before and 24.0% (15.8; 36.5) after the switch, p = 0.65).Conclusion and Implications: Switching from IR- or PR-tacrolimus to LCP-tacrolimus is a safe procedure. However, the CV-tacrolimus IPV was not impacted by the change of formulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document