scholarly journals Exploration and Ethical Analysis of Open-Label Pediatric Vaccine Trials in a Pandemic

Author(s):  
Ian D. Wolfe ◽  
Angira Patel ◽  
Larry K. Kociolek ◽  
Asma Fazal ◽  
Ravi Jhaveri ◽  
...  
Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manaf Alqahtani ◽  
Saad I. Mallah ◽  
Nigel Stevenson ◽  
Sally Doherty

AbstractEver since the emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), global public health infrastructures and systems, along with community-wide collaboration and service, have risen to an unprecedented challenge. Vaccine development was immediately propelled to the centre of all our scientific, public health and community efforts. Despite the development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines arguably being the greatest and most palpable achievements of the past 12 months, they have also been one of the most contentious and debated issues during the pandemic. However, what uniquely differentiates vaccine development is its intimate relationship with the community it seeks to serve; both in its clinical trial testing as an efficacious and safe prophylactic, and its post-developmental ‘roll-out’ success, as an effective public health tool. These relationships have birthed a myriad of complexities, from community-based mistrust, to academically contended ethical dilemmas. Indeed, the accelerated advances in the COVID-19 vaccine race have further exacerbated this phenomenon, bringing with it new ethical dilemmas that need to be examined to ensure the continued clinical success of these therapeutics and a renewed societal trust in clinical medicine.In this paper, we discuss two major ethical dilemmas: (1) the equipoise of continuing new vaccine trials in the advent of successful candidates and (2) the maleficence of blinded placebo arms. Accordingly, we discuss six different potential approaches to these ethical dilemmas: (1) continuing with placebo-controlled trials, (2) transitioning from placebo-controlled to open-label, (3) unblinding at-risk priority groups only, (4) transitioning to a blinded stepped-wedge cross-over design, (5) progressing to a blinded active-controlled stepped-wedge cross-over trial, and (6) conducting randomised stepped-wedge community trials. We also propose a decision-making algorithm for relevant stakeholders in advanced stages of vaccine trials.It is important to remember that the emergent nature of the COVID-19 situation does not justify a compromise on core ethical values. In fact, the discourse surrounding this topic and the decisions made will remain a potent case study and a continuously referenced example for all such future scenarios.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A392-A392 ◽  
Author(s):  
S NIVELONI ◽  
A CHERNAVSKY ◽  
S PEDREIRA ◽  
R MAZURE ◽  
H VAZQUEZ ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A425-A425
Author(s):  
B OLUSOLA ◽  
J DIBAISE ◽  
J HUERTER ◽  
E QUIGLEY
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
NEIL OSTERWEIL
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (04) ◽  
pp. 660-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
G C White ◽  
S Courter ◽  
G L Bray ◽  
M Lee ◽  
E D Gomperts ◽  
...  

SummaryA prospective, open-label multicenter investigation has been conducted to compare pharmacokinetic parameters of recombinant DNA-derived FVIII (rFVIII) and plasma-derived FVIII concentrate (pdFVIII) and to assess safety and efficacy of long-term home-treat- ment with rFVIII for subjects with hemophilia A. Following comparative in vivo pharmacokinetic studies, 69 patients with severe (n = 67) or moderate (n = 2) hemophilia A commenced a program of home treatment using rFVIII exclusively for prophylaxis and treatment of all bleeding episodes for a period of 1.0 to 5.7 years (median 3.7 years). The mean in vivo half-lives of rFVIII and pdFVIII were both 14.7 h. In vivo incremental recoveries at baseline were 2.40%/IU/kg and 2.47%/IU/kg, respectively (p = 0.59). The response to home treatment with rFVIII was categorized as good or excellent in 3,195 (91.2%) of 3,481 evaluated bleeding episodes. Thirteen patients received rFVIII for prophylaxis for twenty-four surgical procedures. In all cases, hemostasis was excellent. Adverse reactions were observed in only 13 of 13,591 (0.096%) infusions of rFVIII; none was serious. No patient developed an inhibitor to r FVIII.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document