A Multi-Institutional Validation of the Prognostic Value of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Study From The Latin American Group of Lymphoproliferative Disorders (GELL)

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 637-646
Author(s):  
Brady E. Beltrán ◽  
Luis Villela ◽  
Maria A. Torres ◽  
Victoria Otero ◽  
Lorena Fiad ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 100173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiko Azuma ◽  
Aya Nakaya ◽  
Shinya Fujita ◽  
Atsushi Satake ◽  
Takahisa Nakanishi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Chen ◽  
Zongxin Zhang ◽  
Qiu Fang ◽  
Huiqin Jian

Abstract Background Recently, some studies reported the prognostic value of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), however, the results varied from different studies. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to explore the prognostic value of PLR in DLBCL. Methods A comprehensive literature retrieval was conducted by using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the association of PLR and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Odd ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for clinicopathological characteristics were statistically analyzed. Results Eight studies with 1931 patients were included for meta-analysis. The pooled analysis indicated that elevated PLR was significantly associated with poor OS (HR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.29–2.31, p < 0.001), but not PFS (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.57–1.27, p = 0.438). Furthermore, elevated PLR was significantly associated with presentation of B symptoms (OR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.29–3.98, p = 0.004), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (OR = 2.76, 95% CI 2.05–3.72, p < 0.001), higher tumor stage (OR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.66–2.98, p < 0.001), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≥ 2 (OR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.09–2.69, p = 0.019). However, elevated PLR was not significantly correlated with gender, age or cell of origin. Conclusion This meta-analysis revealed that PLR may be an effective and noninvasive biomarker for poor prognosis and aggressive disease characteristics for patients with DLBCL.


2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 292-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se-Il Go ◽  
Sungwoo Park ◽  
Jung Hoon Kim ◽  
Hye Ree Kim ◽  
Minyoung Kim ◽  
...  

Background: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been known to predict the prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We planned to design a new prognostic model in DLBCL using well-known prognostic index and NLR. Methods: The data of 232 DLBCL patients treated with first-line R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) from 2004 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with NLR ≥6 and <6 were determined as the high and low NLR groups, respectively. Treatment response and survival were compared according to NLR status. Nomograms for predicting 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were constructed using NLR and other prognostic factors based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) NCCN-IPI. Results: The high NLR group had a low complete response (CR) rate compared to low NLR group (51.6% vs. 83.5%; p<0.001). The 5-year PFS and OS rates were 27.4% and 30% in the high NLR group and 61.1% and 63.7% in the low NLR group, respectively (both p<0.001). Multivariate analyses confirmed that NLR is one of the independent risk factors for failure to achieve CR and for worse PFS and OS. The nomogram showed superior discrimination ability for predicting 5-year PFS and OS rates compared with NCCN-IPI (c index 0.78 vs. 0.75 and 0.79 vs. 0.75, respectively). Conclusions: High NLR was associated with poor treatment response and worse PFS and OS in DLBCL. The nomogram developed from NCCN-IPI-based variables and NLR may help the clinicians to predict the prognosis individually in DLBCL patients, although it needs to be validated in the independent cohort.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1465-1465
Author(s):  
Luigi Marcheselli ◽  
Alessia Bari ◽  
Raffaella Marcheselli ◽  
Tamar Tadmor ◽  
Samantha Pozzi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There is an increasing amount of data showing that tumor microenvironment, host immunity and host inflammation response play an important role in determining the clinical course in patients with malignant lymphoma. Several investigators have considered the absolute monocytes count(AMC) as a surrogate biomarker of tumor associated macrophages, reflecting the tumor microenvironment, the absolute lymphocytes count (ALC) as a surrogate biomarker of tumor infiltrating lymphocyte, reflecting systemic host immunity, and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) as the host inflammatory response to cancer. Every of these parameters have been suggested to be a prognostic factor in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The aim of the present study was to verify whether neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an independent prognostic factor in DLBCL. Patients and Method This retrospective analysis included data from 1050 patients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma according to the WHO criteria. We reviewed the clinical and laboratory data of consecutive "therapy-naïve" patients, treated in different centers in Italy and in Israel between 1993-2012, after approval by local institutional review boards. Patients had received treatment with combination chemotherapy: cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP), CHOP-like, or third-generation anthracycline-containing regimens, with or without rituximab. The cut-off for NLR was determined from the analysis of the log(HR) as function of NLR, by means of Cox cubic spline regression. The importance of the covariate was checked using the bootstrap inclusion frequency (BIF) with log-likelihood ratio test, considering a cut-off of 0.05, over 1000 resample of hierarchical Cox PH model, where NLR was added to IPI. Overall survival (OS) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared by risk groups using the log-rank test .We also performed Cox proportional hazard analysis. The effect size of risk was reported as a hazard ratio (HR) with the associated 95% confidence interval (CI95). Results Out of 1050 patients, 931 (89%)were completed for IPI and NLR. The median age was 60 years (range 18-89), 53% were males and 46% received chemotherapies with rituximab as part of the regimen. The 5-yr OS% after a median follow-up of 62 months (range 1-157 months) was 65% (95CI 61-68) for the entire cohort. The log(HR) vary linearly with the log(NLR) and the cut-off was selected at 3.6. Patients with NLR >3.6 showed a worst OS compared to those NLR ≤3.6 (58% vs 69%) with HR 1.54 (CI95 1.24-1.93, p<0.001). Further, NLR showed a homogeneous prognostic role either in patients treated with rituximab or not (Figure 1). Adjusted in Cox PH regression by IPI score, NLR >3.6 maintain the prognostic value (HR 1.35, CI95 1.08-1.68, p=0.009) with a BIF of 73%. Also NLR in continuous form, log(NLR), showed a prognostic value, either in univariate (HR 1.28, CI95 1.12-1.48, p<0.001) or adjusted by IPI in multiple Cox regression (HR 1.18, CI95 1.03-1.36, p=0.021) with BIF=64%. Conclusion Despite the retrospective nature of the study we demonstrate that the NLR can identify high risk patients at the time of diagnosis, and that this simple prognostic factor can be utilized to improve the discriminating ability of IPI in DLBCL , irrespective of the inclusion of rituxmab in the regimen. In conclusion the NLR is easy to obtain, readily available and can be used as a simple prognostic parameter for clinicians at diagnosis of the disease. Figure 1. OS by NLR < 3.6 or NLR >3.6, in patients population treated with CHOP or CHOP like without R and in patients population treated with CHOP and CHOP like plus R Figure 1. OS by NLR < 3.6 or NLR >3.6, in patients population treated with CHOP or CHOP like without R and in patients population treated with CHOP and CHOP like plus R Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document