Effects of dietary eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid supplementation on metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis data from 33 randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Jun Zhang ◽  
Xiang Gao ◽  
Xiao-Fei Guo ◽  
Ke-Lei Li ◽  
Shan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
Docosahexaenoic Acid ◽  
Eicosapentaenoic Acid ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Acid Supplementation ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Tree Nut Consumption on Metabolic Syndrome Criteria: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. S56
Author(s):  
Sonia Blanco Mejia ◽  
Cyril W. Kendall ◽  
Effie Viguiliouk ◽  
Livia S. Augustin ◽  
Vanessa Ha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Tree Nut

Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid versus α-linolenic acid supplementation on cardiometabolic risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 1919-1932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hengying Chen ◽  
Guifang Deng ◽  
Quan Zhou ◽  
Xinwei Chu ◽  
Mengyang Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Docosahexaenoic Acid ◽  
Eicosapentaenoic Acid ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Cardiometabolic Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Acid Versus

Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) made direct comparisons between EPA/DHA versus ALA on improving cardiovascular risk factors and have reached inconsistent findings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document