Physical and numerical evaluation of effect of specimen size on dynamic tensile strength of rock

2021 ◽  
pp. 104538
Author(s):  
Payam Asadi ◽  
Mohammad Javad Ashrafi ◽  
Ali Fakhimi
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ke Man ◽  
Xiaoli Liu

From the standard test method suggested by ISRM and GB/T50266-2013, the uniaxial static tensile strength, dynamic tensile strength, and dynamic fracture toughness of the same basalt at different depths have been measured, respectively. It is observed that there may be an empirical relation between dynamic fracture toughness and dynamic tensile strength. The testing data show that both the dynamic fracture toughness and dynamic tensile strength increase with the loading rate and the dynamic tensile strength increases a little bit more quickly than the dynamic fracture toughness. With an increasing depth, the dynamic tensile strength has much more influence on the dynamic fracture toughness, as which it is much liable to bring out the unexpected catastrophes in the engineering projects, especially during the excavation at deep mining. From the rock failure mechanisms, it is pointed out that the essential reason of the rock failure is the microcrack unstable propagation. The crack processes growth, propagation, and coalescence are induced by tensile stress, not shear stress or compressive stress. The paper provides estimation of the dynamic fracture toughness from the dynamic tensile strength value, which can be measured more easily.


2018 ◽  
Vol 183 ◽  
pp. 02065
Author(s):  
V. Rey-de-Pedraza ◽  
F. Gálvez ◽  
D. Cendón Franco

The Hopkinson Bar has been widely used by many researchers for the analysis of dynamic properties of different brittle materials and, due to its great interest, for the study of concrete. In concrete structures subjected to high velocity impacts, initial compression pulses travel through the material leading to tensile stresses when they reach a free surface. These tensile efforts are the main cause of concrete fracture due to its low tensile strength compared to the compressive one. This is the reason why dynamic tests in concrete are becoming of great interest and are mostly focused in obtaining tensile fracture properties. Apart form the dynamic tensile strength, which has been widely studied by many authors in the last decades, the dynamic fracture energy presents an increased difficulty and so not too much experimental information can be found in literature. Moreover, up to date there is not a clear methodology proposed in order to obtain this parameter in an accurate way. In this work a new methodology for measuring the dynamic fracture energy is proposed by using the Hopkinson Bar technique. Initial tests for a conventional concrete have been carried out and the results for the dynamic fracture energy of concrete at different strain rates are presented.


1979 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-120
Author(s):  
D. A. Kal'ner ◽  
F. I. Basin

2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 1425-1433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eiichi Hara ◽  
Tomohiro Yokozeki ◽  
Hiroshi Hatta ◽  
Takashi Ishikawa ◽  
Yutaka Iwahori

1944 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. A65-A71
Author(s):  
R. O. Fehr ◽  
E. R. Parker ◽  
D. J. DeMicheal

Abstract In the investigation detailed in this paper, the tensile strength, the yield strength, and the breakage energy of test specimens (cold-rolled steel and dural) were measured while the specimens were being broken by a force applied at a high rate of speed in a commercial high-velocity impact-testing machine. The dynamic tensile strength, the dynamic yield strength and the dynamic breakage energy were found to be higher than the static values up to the maximum impact velocities of these tests (100 fps). The paper contains: (1) A presentation of some results of these tests. (2) A description of the technique used. (3) A description of the analysis used.


2007 ◽  
Vol 101 (10) ◽  
pp. 103528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonggang Wang ◽  
Hongliang He ◽  
Michel Boustie ◽  
Toshimori Sekine

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document