CT texture analysis for the presurgical prediction of superior mesenteric–portal vein invasion in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: comparison with CT imaging features

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Chen ◽  
Y. Zhou ◽  
X. Qi ◽  
W. Xia ◽  
R. Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Portal Vein ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Texture Analysis ◽  
Ct Imaging ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Portal Vein Invasion ◽  
Ct Texture Analysis

Differentiating hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on CT texture analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 595-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhonglan Wang ◽  
Xiao Chen ◽  
Jianhua Wang ◽  
Wenjing Cui ◽  
Shuai Ren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Texture Analysis ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Texture Features ◽  
Ct Images ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Portal Phase ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Ct Texture Analysis

Background Hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor is usually misdiagnosed as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Purpose To investigate the value of texture analysis in differentiating hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images. Material and Methods Twenty-one patients with hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and 63 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas were included in this study. All patients underwent preoperative unenhanced and dynamic contrast-enhanced CT examinations. Two radiologists independently and manually contoured the region of interest of each lesion using texture analysis software on pancreatic parenchymal and portal phase CT images. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify significant features to differentiate hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to ascertain diagnostic ability. Results The following CT texture features were obtained to differentiate hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: RMS (root mean square) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, P<0.001), Quantile50 (OR = 1.83, P<0.001), and sumAverage (OR = 0.92, P=0.007) in parenchymal images and “contrast” in portal phase images (OR = 6.08, P<0.001). The areas under the curves were 0.76 for RMS (sensitivity = 0.75, specificity = 0.67), 0.73 for Quantile50 (sensitivity = 0.60, specificity = 0.77), 0.70 for sumAverage (sensitivity = 0.65, specificity = 0.82), 0.85 for the combined texture features (sensitivity = 0.77, specificity = 0.85). Conclusion CT texture analysis may be helpful to differentiate hypovascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. The three combined texture features showed acceptable diagnostic performance.

Characterization of undiagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on CT scans.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 380-380
Author(s):  
John Chang ◽  
Madelyn Bartels ◽  
Kelsey Beyer ◽  
Ashley Maitland ◽  
Richard Taft Peterson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
The Body ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Cognitive Errors ◽  
Radiologic Findings ◽  
Stage 1 ◽  
Improved Technology ◽  
Radiologic Features

380 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths. At present, the best 5-year survival is 25% for resectable PDAC. For small (1 cm) stage 1 PDAC, resection has resulted in much better survival. The goal of this study was to evaluate the appearance and location of early undiagnosed PDAC on computed tomography scans (CT) prior to diagnosis with the goal of minimizing missing early PDAC. We also categorize the errors as either perceptive or cognitive. Methods: PDAC cases were retrospectively reviewed from 1/1/2012 through 12/31/2018 from our tumor registry, identifying 81 cases with paired CT scans both at the time of and prior to diagnosis. Among these, 31 contained imaging features considered diagnostic or suspicious for early PDAC(38%). These “errors” were classified by radiologic features and as well as by location. In addition, errors were classified into “perceptive errors" when the first study was read as normal, and as “cognitive errors” when the report noted an abnormality but failed to note suspicion for malignancy. Results: Among the 31 undiagnosed PDAC, 18 had features of an identifiable mass (58%), 9 had pancreatic ductal dilatation (29%), and 4 had evidence of perivascular soft tissue (13%). 44% of undiagnosed tumors were located in the head-neck, 39% in the body, and 17% in the tail. Perceptive errors were found in 58% and 42% were cognitive. No significant differences were seen between perceptive and cognitive errors based on suspicious features. Conclusions: Radiologic findings of early PDAC was retrospectively evident in more than one third of cases in which prior imaging was performed. These findings are most often masses or ductal dilatation. Location of these undiagnosed tumors were distributed throughout the gland. This study identifies the radiologic features of undiagnosed PDAC which may provide an opportunity for future prospective studies and improved technology which may improve early detection of pancreatic cancer.

P-P13 Long-term outcome after portal vein resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matched analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Russell ◽  
Claire Stevens ◽  
Rahul Bhome ◽  
Dimitrios Karavias ◽  
Ali Arshad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Perineural Invasion ◽  
Nodal Metastasis ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Portal Vein Resection ◽  
Vein Resection ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Portal vein resection (PVR) with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is often performed to achieve clear margins for patients with vascular involvement in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, there is evidence to suggest that patients undergoing PVR often have more advanced cancers, therefore the impact of PVR on survival and recurrence remains unclear. The aim of this study is to assess overall (OS) and recurrence free (RFS) survival in patients who underwent PVR during PD, with particular attention to margin positivity. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 638 patients who underwent PD during a 12-year period. Exclusion criteria included PD for non-PDAC tumours, neoadjuvant chemotherapy or intra-operative radiotherapy. 374 patients were included in the study (90 PVR and 284 non-PVR). Patient characteristics and histopathological factors associated with OS and RFS were then evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. 270 patients (90 PVR and 180 non-PVR), were matched by propensity score based on perineural invasion, pT and pN staging. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival and log-rank tests. Results Resection margin positivity was associated with shorter OS and RFS (p &lt; 0.0001), and the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) margin was the most significant risk factor for survival on competing risks analysis. Absent adjuvant chemotherapy, nodal metastasis and margin positivity were independent risk factors for OS and RFS on multivariate analysis. PVR was associated with higher intra-operative blood loss (p = 0.009), but was not associated with increased length of stay, complications or readmissions. PVR patients had increased pT staging, nodal metastasis and perineural invasion, however, there was no difference in OS (p = 0.551) or RFS (p = 0.256) between PVR and non-PVR after propensity matching. Conclusions Positive resection margins are associated with shorter survival times, and the SMV margin is the most significant prognostic indicator for overall survival and recurrence compared to other margins. PVR is a relatively safe procedure, however, it does not achieve the intended survival benefits of complete margin clearance. The impact on survival for margin positivity, particularly the SMV margin, and nodal metastasis should be considered when making decisions with regards to vein resection and adjuvant treatments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document