Efficacy and safety of retention enema with traditional Chinese medicine for ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 101278
Author(s):  
Zi-xing Yan ◽  
You-mei Liu ◽  
Teng Ma ◽  
Meng-jun Xu ◽  
Xiao-bin Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Retention Enema ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals The Traditional Chinese Medicine and Relevant Treatment for the Efficacy and Safety of Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao-feng Shi ◽  
Tie-bing Song ◽  
Juan Xie ◽  
Yi-quan Yan ◽  
Yong-ping Du
Keyword(s):  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicines ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Chinese Medicines ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background. Atopic dermatitis (AD) has become a common skin disease that requires systematic and comprehensive treatment to achieve adequate clinical control. Traditional Chinese medicines and related treatments have shown clinical effects for AD in many studies. But the systematic reviews and meta-analyses for them are lacking. Objective. The systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicines and related treatments for AD treatment. Methods. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched based on standardized searching rules in eight medical databases from the inception up to December 2016 and a total of 24 articles with 1,618 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Results. The results revealed that traditional Chinese medicines and related treatments did not show statistical differences in clinical effectiveness, SCORAD amelioration, and SSRI amelioration for AD treatment compared with control group. However, EASI amelioration of traditional Chinese medicines and related treatments for AD was superior to control group. Conclusion. We need to make conclusion cautiously for the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine and related treatment on AD therapy. More standard, multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of traditional Chinese medicine and related treatment for AD were required to be conducted for more clinical evidences providing in the future.

Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of epilepsy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 01 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongrong Chen ◽  
Chenxi Feng ◽  
Keer Wang ◽  
Huawei Zhao ◽  
Jie Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Effective Rate ◽  
Licorice Root ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Treatment Of Epilepsy

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in the treatment of epilepsy. Methods: A comprehensive search of database in both Chinese and English was performed. Data from the selected studies was extracted and analyzed independently by two authors. Results: Twenty-two randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 1773 patients. Among them, three trials (n=166) focused on TCM monotherapy, while the other 19 trials (n=1607) assessed the benefit of TCM add-on therapy to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). For the efficacy, meta-analysis found (1) TCM monotherapy had a higher effective rate compared with AEDs (OR=6.007, 95%CI: 2.570-14.037, Z=6.007, P<0.001); (2) the add-on of TCM increased the effective rate (OR=3.123, 95%CI: 2.356, 4.140), Z=7.916, P<0.001). In terms of safety, the add-on of TCM reduced the rate of total AEs (OR = 0.407, 95%CI: 0.274-0.605, P <0.0001) as well as AEs regarding the gastrointestinal and nervous system. Nineteen different TCM prescription was used in these RTCs. Among them, the five most frequently used herbs were Acorus tatarinowii (14 out of 19), Wolfiporia Cocos (10 out of 19), Pinellia Ternata (9 out of 19), Licorice Root (9 out of 19) and Rhizoma Gastrodiae (8 out of 19). Conclusion: TCM is an efficacy and safety strategy for the mono- or add-on treatment of epilepsy. However, as the small sample size, the diversified composition of TCM prescriptions, and the low quality of study design, further studies remain needed.

scholarly journals Traditional Chinese Medicine Strategy for Patients with Tourette Syndrome Based on Clinical Efficacy and Safety: A Meta-Analysis of 47 Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Na Wang ◽  
Dong-dong Qin ◽  
Yu-huan Xie ◽  
Xin-chen Wu ◽  
Ding-yue Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Tourette Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Objective. Although increasing evidence reveals the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and its safety on Tourette Syndrome (TS) patients, whether TCM is indeed improving TS remains unclear. The purpose of the current study is to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCM on treating TS patients. Method. An elaborate search strategy was conducted based on several databases including Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, CINAHL, CBM, VIP, CNKI, and Wanfang Data in order to identify the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from their inception to as late as May 1st, 2020. General information and data needing analysis were extracted simultaneously for the necessity of various analyses such as descriptive analysis and metaquantitative analysis. Results. Forty-seven trials with 5437 TS patients in total were eventually included according to our criteria. All trials were conducted in China, and the publication years ranged from 2004 to 2017. In terms of clinical efficacy, clinical symptoms of patients with TCM were more likely to be improved compared with the control group (odds ratio, OR = − 1.29 , 95% confidence interval, CI: -2.54 to -0.06, I 2 = 0.00 % ). As to the outcome of recurrence rate, the pooled results revealed that the TCM group was more inclined to stabilize the recurrence ( OR = 0.44 , 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.78, I 2 = 0.00 % ). Similar results were observed in adverse reaction ( OR = 0.32 , 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.43, I 2 = 32.90 % ). Conclusion. The results of our study recommend applying TCM to treat TS patients for better efficacy and safety. Results need to be interpreted cautiously due to certain limitations in our study.

scholarly journals Traditional Chinese Medicine Preparation Combined Therapy May Improve Chemotherapy Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaming Wu ◽  
Yun Liu ◽  
Cantu Fang ◽  
Lixian Zhao ◽  
Lizhu Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine Preparation

Background. Whether traditional Chinese medicine preparation combined therapy can improve the efficacy of chemotherapy is controversial. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine preparation combined with chemotherapy. Method. Three databases were searched from inception through August 2018. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving the combined treatment of chemotherapy and traditional Chinese medicine preparation compared to chemotherapy alone for treating cancer were retrieved. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was assessed with Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias assessment tool. Meta-analysis was adopted to make comprehensive comparisons between the experimental and control groups. Results. Four RCTs were included in this review, comprising 256 subjects. The majority of the RCTs were judged as being of poor methodological quality. Meta-analysis showed that the combination of traditional Chinese medicine preparation and chemotherapy appeared to be more effective than chemotherapy alone, for the treatment of cancer, as assessed by the disease control rate (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.79) and the objective response rate (RR: 2.71, 95% CI: 1.28 to 5.77). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of bone marrow suppression (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.57 to 1.37) or gastrointestinal reaction (RR: 1.12, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.69). Conclusions. Traditional Chinese medicine preparation combined with chemotherapy may improve objective response rates and disease control rates more than chemotherapy alone. The evidence that combined traditional Chinese medicine preparation can reduce the side effects of chemotherapy is insufficient. More rigorous randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these conclusions.

scholarly journals Jianpi Bushen, a Traditional Chinese Medicine Therapy, Combined with Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Treatment: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunbo Chen ◽  
Guijuan Zhang ◽  
Xiaoping Chen ◽  
Xuefeng Jiang ◽  
Fengjie Bie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Gastric Cancer Treatment

Objective. To investigate the effects of Jianpi Bushen (JPBS), a traditional Chinese medicine that is used to invigorate the spleen and tonify the kidney, combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of gastric cancer. Methods. Literature retrieval was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CNKI, Wanfang Data Information Site, and VIP from inception to October 2017. Randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effects of JPBS combined with chemotherapy were identified. The primary reported outcomes were KPS (Karnofsky Performance Status), clinical curative efficiency, immune function, blood system, and nonhematologic system. Review Manager 5.3 (RevMan 5.3) was used for data analysis, and the quality of the studies was also appraised. Results. A total of 26 studies were included with 3098 individuals. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that treatment of gastric cancer with the combination of JPBS and chemotherapy resulted in better outcomes compared to chemotherapy alone. Conclusion. Evidence from the meta-analysis suggested that JPBS combined with chemotherapy has a positive effect on gastric cancer treatment. However, additional rigorously designed and large sample randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the efficacy and safety of this treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document