Establishing the validity of different susceptibility testing methods to evaluate the in vitro activity of amoxicillin-clavulanate against Escherichia coli

2016 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Díez-Aguilar María ◽  
Morosini María-Isabel ◽  
Conejo María-Carmen ◽  
Pascual Álvaro ◽  
Calvo Jorge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Testing Methods ◽  
Amoxicillin Clavulanate

scholarly journals 598. In Vitro Activity of Aztreonam in Combination with Ceftazidime–Avibactam, Amoxicillin–Clavulanate, and Piperacillin–Tazobactam vs. NDM-Producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S281-S281
Author(s):  
Andrew Walkty ◽  
James Karlowsky
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Klebsiella Pneumoniae ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Zone Diameter ◽  
Amoxicillin Clavulanate ◽  
Lactamase Inhibitor

Abstract Background There are limited options available for the treatment of infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae that produce an NDM metallo-β-lactamase. The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro activity of aztreonam in combination with three different β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (ceftazidime–avibactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin–tazobactam) vs. NDM-positive Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates. Methods Seven Escherichia coli and three Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates (all NDM-positive by PCR) were included in this study. The in vitro activities of ceftazidime–avibactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin–tazobactam, and aztreonam were determined by disk diffusion as described by CLSI. For synergy testing, disks containing a β-lactamase inhibitor (ceftazidime–avibactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin tazobactam) were applied to Mueller–Hinton agar plates inoculated with the test organisms, and the plates were incubated for 1 hour. The disks were then removed and aztreonam disks were dropped on the previous disk sites. The plates were then incubated as per standard CLSI recommendations for disk diffusion testing. Results All ten isolates demonstrated phenotypic resistance to aztreonam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and piperacillin–tazobactam, and eight were resistant to ceftazidime–avibactam (CLSI breakpoints). The zone diameter observed for aztreonam in combination with ceftazidime–avibactam was greater than for either antimicrobial on its own for nine isolates. Seven isolates (70%) had susceptibility to aztreonam restored (zone diameter ≥21 mm) in the presence of avibactam. Aztreonam in combination with amoxicillin-clavulanate demonstrated in increase in zone diameter for all isolates relative to the zone for each antimicrobial alone, but only two (20%) had aztreonam susceptibility restored. Aztreonam susceptibility was not restored for any of the isolates in combination with piperacillin–tazobactam. Conclusion Of the three β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor-aztreonam combinations evaluated, ceftazidime–avibactam plus aztreonam demonstrated the greatest in vitro activity vs. NDM-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 710. In Vitro Activity and Performance of Available Susceptibility Testing Methods for Eravacycline Against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S319-S320
Author(s):  
Chelsea E Jones ◽  
Ellen G Kline ◽  
Minh-Hong Nguyen ◽  
Cornelius J Clancy ◽  
Ryan K Shields
Keyword(s):  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Testing Methods ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Susceptibility Breakpoint

Abstract Background Eravacycline (ERV) is a recently-approved, fully synthetic fluorocycline agent that demonstrates broad in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant pathogens. We sought to compare the activity of ERV with minocycline (MIN) and tigecycline (TGC) against diverse CRE clinical isolates, and to evaluate the performance of commercially-available susceptibility testing methods. Methods ERV, MIN, and TGC minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined in triplicate by broth microdilution against previously characterized CRE isolates. ERV susceptibility was also measured by disk diffusion (20 µg disk; Mast Group) and MIC test strips (MTS; Liofilchem) according to manufacturer instructions. Results 148 CRE were tested, including 92 K. pneumoniae, 32 Enterobacter spp, 11 E. coli, 5 C. freundii, 4 K. oxytoca, and 4 S. marcescens. 72% of isolates harbored blaKPC, which encoded KPC-2 (n = 33), KPC-3 (n = 48), and other KPC variants (n = 22). 77% and 19% of isolates were resistant to meropenem and ceftazidime–avibactam, respectively. By BMD, the ERV, MIN, and TGC MIC range, MIC50 and MIC90 for shown in the Table. ERV MICs were ≥2-fold lower than MIN and TGC against 99% and 43% of isolates, respectively. ERV MICs did not vary by species or KPC-subtype. ERV MICs determined by BMD and MTS were well-correlated showing 89% essential agreement (MIC within one 2-fold dilution; Figure). The rate of categorical agreement (CA) was 73%. By comparison, the CA rate between BMD and disk diffusion was 78%. By both MTS and disk diffusion methods, susceptibility results clustered on either side of the susceptibility breakpoint. 50% of disk diffusion zones clustered between 14 and 16 millimeters (mm), which is 1 mm on either side of the susceptibility breakpoint (≥15 mm). Conclusion This study confirms the in vitro activity of ERV against CRE clinical isolates, which is comparable to TGC. ERV MTS demonstrated high rates of EA, but lower rates of CA. Clinicians should be aware of the nuances of ERV susceptibility testing and recognize that the modal distribution of ERV MICs against CRE lies on either side of the susceptibility breakpoint. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals In Vitro Susceptibility Testing Methods for Caspofungin against Aspergillus andFusarium Isolates

2001 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 327-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sevtap Arikan ◽  
Mario Lozano-Chiu ◽  
Victor Paetznick ◽  
John H. Rex
Keyword(s):  
Incubation Time ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Effective Concentration ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Testing Methods ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility ◽  
Minimum Effective Concentration ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility Testing

ABSTRACT We investigated the relevance of prominent reduction in turbidity macroscopically (MIC) and formation of aberrant hyphal tips microscopically (minimum effective concentration; MEC) in measuring the in vitro activity of caspofungin against Aspergillus andFusarium. Caspofungin generated low MICs and MECs againstAspergillus, but not for Fusarium. While MICs increased inconsistently when the incubation time was prolonged, MEC appeared as a stable and potentially relevant endpoint in testing in vitro caspofungin activity.

scholarly journals In Vitro Activity of Cefepime against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli, Viridans Group Streptococci andStreptococcus pneumoniaefrom a Cross-Canada Surveillance Study

1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald E Low ◽  
Joyce de Azavedo ◽  
Canadian Bacterial Surveillance Network ◽  
Ross Davidson
Keyword(s):  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Surveillance Study ◽  
National Committee ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Resistance Rates ◽  
Viridans Group Streptococci

OBJECTIVE: To determine the in vitro activity of cefepime against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli and Gram-positive cocci obtained from an ongoing cross-Canada surveillance study.DESIGN: Clinical isolates of aerobic Gram-negative bacilli with inducible and constitutive chromosomally mediated cephalosporinases, viridans group streptococci andStreptococcus pneumoniaewere collected from laboratories serving hospitals, nursing homes and physician offices in the community from across Canada during 1996 and 1997. Laboratories were asked to submit only clinically relevant nonduplicate isolates for susceptibility testing. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out on all isolates of Gram-negative and viridans group streptococci.S pneumoniaewere characterized as penicillin susceptible, intermediately resistant or highly resistant. Nonsusceptible isolates were defined as being intermediately or highly resistant (minimal inhibitory concentrations [MIC] greater than 0.06 mg/L). Only isolates ofS pneumoniaethat were nonsusceptible to penicillin were selected for further study. MICs were determined using a microbroth dilution technique according to the National Committee of Clinical Laboratory Standards.RESULTS: A total of 727 Gram-negative bacilli samples were collected. No resistance to cefepime was detected withCitrobacter freundii,Serratia marcescens,Morganella morganiiandEnterobacterspecies. Of these strains,Enterobacterspecies andC freundiiwere the most resistant to ceftazidime, cefotaxime and ceftriaxone with MIC90Sof 32 mg/L or greater and resistance rates of 6% or greater. Resistance rates ofPseudomonas aeruginosaandAcinetobacterspecies to cefepime were 4.8% and 3%, respectively. The two organisms had similar rates of resistance to ceftazidime. Less than 3% of the Gram-negative bacilli were resistant to imipenem and meropenem. There were 153 viridans group streptococci, of which 22 (14.4%) were resistant to penicillin. Of 1287S pneumoniaesamples, 193 (15%) were nonsusceptible to penicillin. Cefepime, ceftriaxone and cefotaxime had comparable activity against all isolates of viridans group streptococci andS pneumoniae.CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime demonstrated excellent in vitro activity against Gram-negative bacilli with inducible and constitutive chromosomally mediated cephalosporinases, and had equal or superior activity versus comparator beta-lactams against all isolates of viridans group streptococci andS pneumoniae.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document