scholarly journals Availability of disaggregated greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle production: A systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 69-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Lynch
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 220-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stine Samsonstuen ◽  
Bente A. Åby ◽  
Paul Crosson ◽  
Karen A. Beauchemin ◽  
Laila Aass

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 1383-1388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Breanna M Roque ◽  
Henk J Van Lingen ◽  
Hilde Vrancken ◽  
Ermias Kebreab

Abstract: Enteric methane (CH4) production is the main source of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock globally with beef cattle contributing 5.95% of total global greenhouse gas emissions. Various mitigation strategies have been developed to reduce enteric emissions with limited success. In vitro studies have shown a reduction in CH4 emissions when using garlic and citrus extracts. However, there is paucity of data regarding in vivo studies investigating the effect of garlic and citrus extracts in cattle. The objective of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the response of Angus × Hereford cross steers consuming the feed additive Mootral, which contains extracts of both garlic and citrus, on CH4 yield (g/kg dry matter intake [DMI]). Twenty steers were randomly assigned to two treatments: control (no additive) and Mootral supplied at 15 g/d in a completely randomized design with a 2-wk covariate and a 12-wk data collection periods. Enteric CH4 emissions were measured using the GreenFeed system during the covariate period and experimental weeks 2, 6, 9, and 12. CH4 yield (g/kg DMI) by steers remained similar in both treatments for weeks 2 to 9. In week 12, there was a significant decrease in CH4 yield (23.2%) in treatment compared to control steers mainly because the steers were consuming all the pellets containing the additive. However, overall CH4 yield (g/kg DMI) during the entire experimental period was not significantly different. Carbon dioxide yield (g/kg DMI) and oxygen consumption (g/kg DMI) did not differ between treatments during the entire experimental period. DMI, average daily gain, and feed efficiency also remained similar in control and supplemented steers. The in vivo results showed that Mootral may have a potential to be used as a feed additive to reduce enteric CH4 production and yield in beef cattle but needs further investigation under various dietary regimen.


2018 ◽  
Vol 627 ◽  
pp. 388-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinghong Gao ◽  
Sari Kovats ◽  
Sotiris Vardoulakis ◽  
Paul Wilkinson ◽  
Alistair Woodward ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. e0199577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Del Bianco Benedeti ◽  
Mozart Alves Fonseca ◽  
Teshome Shenkoru ◽  
Marcos Inácio Marcondes ◽  
Eduardo Marostegan de Paula ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Evangelos Alexandropoulos ◽  
Vasileios Anestis ◽  
Thomas Bartzanas

In this paper, 15 farm-scale Green House Gas-based (GHG-based) decision support (DS) tools were evaluated based on a number of criteria (descriptive evaluation), as well as the parameters requested as inputs and the outputs, all of which are considered important for the estimation procedure and the decision support approach. The tools were grouped as emission calculators and tools providing indicators in terms of more than one pillar of sustainability. The results suggest an absence of automatic consultation in decision support in most of the tools. Furthermore, dairy and beef cattle production systems are the most represented in the tools examined. This research confirms a number of important functionalities of modern GHG-based DS tools.


2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1979-1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chanhee Lee ◽  
Rafael C. Araujo ◽  
Karen M. Koenig ◽  
Michael L. Hile ◽  
Eileen E. Fabian-Wheeler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document