Early change in tumour size predicts overall survival in patients with first-line metastatic breast cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 95-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonya C. Tate ◽  
Valerie Andre ◽  
Nathan Enas ◽  
Benjamin Ribba ◽  
Ivelina Gueorguieva
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumour Size ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
First Line ◽  
Early Change

Phase III Trial of Epirubicin Plus Paclitaxel Compared With Epirubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide As First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Trial AB01

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (33) ◽  
pp. 8322-8330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E. Langley ◽  
James Carmichael ◽  
Alison L. Jones ◽  
David A. Cameron ◽  
Wendi Qian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Purpose To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of epirubicin and paclitaxel (EP) with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients and Methods Patients previously untreated with chemotherapy (except for adjuvant therapy) were randomly assigned to receive either EP (epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2) or EC (epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary outcome was progression-free survival; secondary outcome measures were overall survival, response rates, and toxicity. Results Between 1996 and 1999, 705 patients (353 EP patients and 352 EC patients) underwent random assignment. Patient characteristics were well matched between the two groups, and 71% of patients received six cycles of treatment. Objective response rates were 65% for the EP group and 55% for the EC group (P = .015). At the time of analysis, 641 patients (91%) had died. Median progression-free survival time was 7.0 months for the EP group and 7.1 months for the EC group (hazard ratio = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.24; P = .41), and median overall survival time was 13 months for the EP group and 14 months for the EC group (hazard ratio = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.19; P = .8). EP patients, compared with EC patients, had more grade 3 and 4 mucositis (6% v 2%, respectively; P = .0006) and grade 3 and 4 neurotoxicity (5% v 1%, respectively; P < .0001). Conclusion In terms of progression-free survival and overall survival, there was no evidence of a difference between EP and EC. The data demonstrate no additional advantage to using EP instead of EC as first-line chemotherapy for MBC in taxane-naïve patients.

Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel Versus Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide as First-Line Therapy for Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Final Results of a Randomized Phase III Multicenter Trial

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1707-1715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacek Jassem ◽  
Tadeusz Pieńkowski ◽  
Anna Płuzańska ◽  
Svetislav Jelic ◽  
Vera Gorbunova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: This phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) to 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) as first-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 267 women with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive either AT (doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 followed 24 hours later by paclitaxel 220 mg/m2) or FAC (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2), each administered every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. Patients had to have measurable disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2. Only one prior non–anthracycline, nontaxane-containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimen was allowed. RESULTS: Overall response rates for patients randomized to AT and FAC were 68% and 55%, respectively (P = .032). Median time to progression and overall survival were significantly longer for AT compared with FAC (time to progression 8.3 months v 6.2 months [P = .034]; overall survival 23.3 months v 18.3 months [P = .013]). Therapy was generally well-tolerated (median of eight cycles delivered in each arm). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more common with AT than with FAC (89% v 65%; P < .001); however, the incidence of fever and infection was low. Grade 3 or 4 arthralgia and myalgia, peripheral neuropathy, and diarrhea were more common with AT, whereas nausea and vomiting were more common with FAC. The incidence of cardiotoxicity was low in both arms. CONCLUSION: AT conferred a significant advantage in response rate, time to progression, and overall survival compared with FAC. Treatment was well-tolerated with no unexpected toxicities.

Use of pretreatment serum CA9 (carbonic anhydrase 9) to predict PFS and survival in trastuzumab-treated metastatic breast cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11092-11092
Author(s):  
K. Leitzel ◽  
H. Y. Hou ◽  
V. Shrivastava ◽  
U. Anyanwu ◽  
S. M. Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Pretreatment Serum

11092 Background: Approximately half of HER2-positive breast cancer patients will respond to first-line trastuzumab-containing therapy. However, in those patients with an initial trastuzumab response, most will progress within a year with acquired resistance. Since trastuzumab treatment is also now used in the HER2-positive adjuvant breast cancer setting, trastuzumab resistance will continue to be a vexing clinical problem, and better predictive and prognostic biomarkers are urgently needed. Methods: Serum HER2, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), CA9, VEGF-165, and endoglin were measured using ELISA assays in 66 metastatic breast cancer patients before starting first-line trastuzumab-containing therapy. The HER2, TIMP-1, uPA, CA9, and VEGF-165 ELISAs were from Oncogene Science/Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Cambridge, MA; and the endoglin ELISA was from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox modeling with continuous pretreatment serum biomarker variables. Results: Pretreatment serum HER2 (p= 0.005), TIMP-1 (p< 0.0001), uPA (p= 0.006), endoglin (p= 0.008), and CA9 (p <0.0001) were all significant as univariate continuous biomarkers for predicting PFS to first-line trastuzumab-containing therapy, but VEGF was not. In multivariate analysis for PFS with all six biomarkers, only serum CA9 (p= 0.002) was a significant independent covariate. For OS, pretreatment serum HER2 (p= 0.018), TIMP-1 (p< 0.0001), uPA (p< 0.0001), endoglin (p= 0.002), and CA9 (p< 0.0001) were all significant as univariate continuous biomarkers for prognosis, but serum VEGF was not. In multivariate analysis for OS with all six biomarkers, only serum CA9 was a significant independent prognostic covariate (p= 0.001). Conclusions: Elevated pretreatment serum CA9 (a marker of hypoxia) predicts reduced progression-free survival and overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first-line trastuzumab-containing therapy. These serum biomarkers deserve further study in larger trials of HER2-targeted breast cancer treatment. Supported by a grant from Komen for the Cure. [Table: see text]

Estimated life years saved with trastuzumab in first-line HER2+ metastatic breast cancer from 1999 to 2013.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 625-625
Author(s):  
Mark Danese ◽  
Deepa Lalla ◽  
Melissa Brammer ◽  
Eduardo Santos ◽  
Abraham Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
The United States ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Base Case ◽  
First Line ◽  
Life Years

625 Background: Trastuzumab was approved in the United States (US) in September 1998 for the treatment of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This model estimates the total number of life years saved (LYS) in US women treated with trastuzumab over a 15-year period (1999-2013). Methods: Using US population estimates and cancer registry-based incidence data, we estimated the number of women with recurrent stage I-III or de novo stage IV HER2+ MBC by year, age, hormone receptor, and nodal status. Trastuzumab utilization was based on published studies of HER2 testing rates, true positive rates in the community, and treatment initiation rates. Survival was estimated by extrapolating survival data pooled across 5 trials and 2 observational studies separately for women treated with trastuzumab and with chemotherapy alone. Few studies reported survival in women with HER2+ MBC without trastuzumab (N=3). Sensitivity analyses were conducted by estimating overall survival from the initial phase 3 trial (67% of placebo patients crossed over to trastuzumab after progression; HR=0.80), and assuming a higher risk reduction to account for crossover effects in clinical trials (HR=0.60). Results: In the base case, approximately 83,462 women with HER2+ MBC were estimated to receive 1st line trastuzumab over a 15-year period. The pooled median overall survival across studies without and with trastuzumab was 21.2 and 35.5 months, respectively. Patients were projected to live a total of 216,290 life years if trastuzumab had not been available and if they received chemotherapy only. These same patients were estimated to live a total of 294,877 life years with first-line trastuzumab, for an incremental benefit of 78,587 LYS. In sensitivity analysis, total LYS ranged from 48,334-96,360. Conclusions: Real-world evidence supports a median overall survival of approximately 36 months in women with HER2+ MBC receiving 1st line trastuzumab. Using a population-based, conservative model, we found that trastuzumab use has resulted in > 75,000 life years over 15 years in women with HER2+ MBC. Future research is warranted to examine the characteristics, experiences, and outcomes among women living longer with HER2+ MBC.

Anastrozole in combination with fulvestrant in the first line treatment of hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer: A meta-analysis.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11591-e11591
Author(s):  
Pui San Tan ◽  
Benjamin Haaland ◽  
Alberto J. Montero ◽  
Gilberto Lopes
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Hormonal Receptor ◽  
First Line Treatment

e11591 Background: Emerging resistance to single agent aromatase inhibitors (AI) or fulvestrant as first line treatment for postmenopausal women with advanced hormonal receptor positive breast cancer calls for alternative therapeutic options. This meta-analysis studies the effectiveness of combination therapy with fulvestrant and an AI, as compared to an AI alone in first line treatment of postmenopausal patients with hormonal receptor positive relapsed or metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Literature search was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, ASCO and ESMO to search for studies published during the last 10 years using relevant keywords. Two prospective randomized clinical trials were found to fulfill the search criteria for combination of fulvestrant + AI vs. AI alone (both studied anastrozole in combination with fulvestrant). Meta-estimates were calculated by combining study estimates using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. The linear mixed-effects model was used to generate 95% prediction intervals for study-specific hazard and odds ratios. Results: Pooled hazard ratio for progression free survival was 0.88 (95% CI 0.72-1.09, 95% prediction interval [PI] 0.65-1.21). Pooled HR for overall survival was 0.88 (95% CI 0.72-1.08, 95% PI 0.68-1.14). Pooled odds ratio for response rate was 1.13 (95% CI 0.79-1.63, 95% PI 0.78-1.65). Conclusions: Pooled results showed a small, non-statistically significant, improvement in progression-free and overall survival. These results do not support the use of combination therapy with fulvestrant and anastrozole in the first line treatment of postmenopausal patients with hormonal receptor positive relapsed or metastatic breast cancer.

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus epirubicin as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer: Efficacy and safety results of a randomized, phase III trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1087-1087
Author(s):  
Zhongsheng Tong ◽  
Shufen Li ◽  
Yehui Shi ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

1087 Background: Paclitaxel/carboplatin combinations are highly active in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We conducted a randomized, phase III, non-inferiority trial comparing paclitaxel/carboplatin (TP) with paclitaxel/epirubicin (TE) as first-line therapy for MBC. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary endpoints included response rate, overall survival, tolerability, and quality of life (QoL). Methods: From June 2009 to January 2015, 231 patients were randomly assigned, 115 of whom were randomized to TP and 116 to TE. Baseline characteristics were relatively well-balanced in the two treatments. Results: After a median follow-up of 29 months, no significant difference was observed between the two treatments in objective response rate (ORR) (38.3% vs. 39.7%, respectively). Both the progression-free survival (p=0.158) and overall survival (p=0.369) were very similar between the two treatments. Both regimens were well tolerated. The main toxicities were myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions, and alopecia. TP showed higher grades 3–4 alopecia and higher nausea (p<0.05). TE showed higher incidence of myelosuppression than TP (p<0.05) (Table). Those patients whose epirubicin cumulative dose was more than 1000 mg/m2 did not suffer worse cardiotoxicity. Conclusions: Our study suggests that TP arm is an effective therapeutic alternative for patients with MBC, especially in those previously exposed to epirubicin in the adjuvant setting. TP has some advantages, such as less cost and less side effects (myelosuppression and fatigue). Clinical trial information: NCT02207361. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document