RETRACTED: Proton-pumping-ATPase-targeted antifungal activity of cinnamaldehyde based sulfonyl tetrazoles

2012 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 363-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheikh Shreaz ◽  
Mohmmad Younus Wani ◽  
Sheikh Rayees Ahmad ◽  
Sheikh Imran Ahmad ◽  
Rimple Bhatia ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 483
Author(s):  
Sheikh Shreaz ◽  
Mohmmad Younus Wani ◽  
Sheikh Rayees Ahmad ◽  
Sheikh Imran Ahmad ◽  
Rimple Bhatia ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 2950-2959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias K. Manavathu ◽  
Jonathan R. Dimmock ◽  
Sarvesh C. Vashishtha ◽  
Pranatharthi H. Chandrasekar

ABSTRACT NC1175 (3-[3-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-propenoyl]-4-[2-(4-chlorophenyl)vinylene]-1-ethyl-4-piperidinol hydrochloride) is a novel thiol-blocking conjugated styryl ketone that exhibits activity against a wide spectrum of pathogenic fungi. Incubation of NC1175 with various concentrations of cysteine and glutathione eliminated its antifungal activity in a concentration-dependent fashion. Since NC1175 is a lipophilic compound that has the potential to interact with cytoplasmic membrane components, we examined its effect on the membrane-located proton-translocating ATPase (H+-ATPase) of yeast (Candida albicans, Candida krusei,Candida guilliermondii, Candida glabrata, andSaccharomyces cerevisiae) and Aspergillus(Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger,Aspergillus flavus, and Aspergillus nidulans) species. The glucose-induced acidification of external medium due to H+-ATPase-mediated expulsion of intracellular protons by these fungi was measured in the presence of several concentrations of the drug. NC1175 (12.5 to 50 μM) inhibited acidification of external medium by Candida, Saccharomyces, andAspergillus species in a concentration-dependent manner. Vanadate-inhibited hydrolysis of ATP by membrane fractions of C. albicans was completely inhibited by 50 μM NC1175, suggesting that the target of action of NC1175 in these fungi may include H+-ATPase.


Planta Medica ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (09) ◽  
Author(s):  
DN Silva ◽  
MJ Gonçalves ◽  
MT Amaral ◽  
MT Batista
Keyword(s):  

Planta Medica ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
JE Fierro ◽  
P Jiménez ◽  
ED Coy-Barrera

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 52-62
Author(s):  
Sara Omran ◽  
Abdulghani Alsamarai ◽  
Firas Razzzaq

Background: Fungal infections are one of the common skin diseases with difficulty in their treatment approach. The present efficient drugs for fungal infection are limited. Aim: To determine the therapeutic efficacy of plant extracts as alternative antifungal agents. Materials and methods: 100 clinical samples [68 from female and 32 from male] were collected during the period from March to July 2017 from subjects attending Dermatology Clinic in Salah Uldean General Hospital. Fungal infection was diagnosed with using KOH wet preparation. Fungal species identified by using conventional approach. The active ingredients existing in the plant extracts were detected and analyzed through qualitative and quantitative detection technique of chemical compounds using a high performance liquid chromatographic device (HPLC). Agar diffusion method was used to determine antifungal activity of plant extracts. Results: Direct microscopic examination showed that there were (75%) positive samples, while culture shows (67%) positive samples. The isolated dermatophytes belong to Epidermophyoton, Microsporum, and Trichophyton genus. The predominant dermatophytes were T. rubrum (25%) species. The highest frequency of infection was in the age group of 11-20 years. The sensitivity of the tested fungi to the aqueous and alcoholic plant extracts varies. Alcoholic extract of the hot pepper plant was more effective as antifungal than the aqueous extract of the same plant. However, aqueous hot pepper extracts was more effective against T. mentagrophyte than that of alcoholic extract. Additionally, alcoholic Sumac extract shows higher efficacy that aqueous extract. Conclusion: Hot pepper and Sumac extracts show antifungal activity against Microsporum canis, Trichophyton rubrum and T. mentagrophyte.


2009 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 110-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomiharu Yamaguchi ◽  
Masanori Takisawa ◽  
Toshihiko Kiwa ◽  
Hironobu Yamada ◽  
Keiji Tsukada

2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 43-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Yamunarani ◽  
R. Jaganathan ◽  
R. Bhaskaran ◽  
P. Govindaraju ◽  
R. Velazhahan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document