Preserving image texture while reducing radiation dose with a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm in chest CT: A phantom study

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 86-93
Author(s):  
Caro Franck ◽  
Guozhi Zhang ◽  
Paul Deak ◽  
Federica Zanca
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 3951-3959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joël Greffier ◽  
Aymeric Hamard ◽  
Fabricio Pereira ◽  
Corinne Barrau ◽  
Hugo Pasquier ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 94 (1120) ◽  
pp. 20201291
Author(s):  
Yannan Cheng ◽  
Yangyang Han ◽  
Jianying Li ◽  
Ganglian Fan ◽  
Le Cao ◽  
...  

Objectives: To compare the image quality of low-dose CT urography (LD-CTU) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) with conventional CTU (C-CTU) using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V). Methods: This was a prospective, single-institutional study using the excretory phase CTU images for analysis. Patients were assigned to the LD-DLIR group (100kV and automatic mA modulation for noise index (NI) of 23) and C-ASIR-V group (100kV and NI of 10) according to the scan protocols in the excretory phase. Two radiologists independently assessed the overall image quality, artifacts, noise and sharpness of urinary tracts. Additionally, the mean CT attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) in the urinary tracts were evaluated. Results: 26 patients each were included in the LD-DLIR group (10 males and 16 females; mean age: 57.23 years, range: 33–76 years) and C-ASIR-V group (14 males and 12 females; mean age: 60 years, range: 33–77 years). LD-DLIR group used a significantly lower effective radiation dose compared with the C-ASIR-V group (2.01 ± 0.44 mSv vs 6.9 ± 1.46 mSv, p < 0.001). LD-DLIR group showed good overall image quality with average score >4 and was similar to that of the C-ASIR-V group. Both groups had adequate and similar attenuation value, SNR and CNR in most segments of urinary tracts. Conclusion: It is feasibility to provide comparable image quality while reducing 71% radiation dose in low-dose CTU with a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm compared to the conventional CTU with ASIR-V. Advances in knowledge: (1) CT urography with deep learning reconstruction algorithm can reduce the radiation dose by 71% while still maintaining image quality.


Author(s):  
Zlatan Alagic ◽  
Jacqueline Diaz Cardenas ◽  
Kolbeinn Halldorsson ◽  
Vitali Grozman ◽  
Stig Wallgren ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To compare the image quality between a deep learning–based image reconstruction algorithm (DLIR) and an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm (ASiR-V) in noncontrast trauma head CT. Methods Head CT scans from 94 consecutive trauma patients were included. Images were reconstructed with ASiR-V 50% and the DLIR strengths: low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high (DLIR-H). The image quality was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively and compared between the different reconstruction algorithms. Inter-reader agreement was assessed by weighted kappa. Results DLIR-M and DLIR-H demonstrated lower image noise (p < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons), higher SNR of up to 82.9% (p < 0.001), and higher CNR of up to 53.3% (p < 0.001) compared to ASiR-V. DLIR-H outperformed other DLIR strengths (p ranging from < 0.001 to 0.016). DLIR-M outperformed DLIR-L (p < 0.001) and ASiR-V (p < 0.001). The distribution of reader scores for DLIR-M and DLIR-H shifted towards higher scores compared to DLIR-L and ASiR-V. There was a tendency towards higher scores with increasing DLIR strengths. There were fewer non-diagnostic CT series for DLIR-M and DLIR-H compared to ASiR-V and DLIR-L. No images were graded as non-diagnostic for DLIR-H regarding intracranial hemorrhage. The inter-reader agreement was fair-good between the second most and the less experienced reader, poor-moderate between the most and the less experienced reader, and poor-fair between the most and the second most experienced reader. Conclusion The image quality of trauma head CT series reconstructed with DLIR outperformed those reconstructed with ASiR-V. In particular, DLIR-M and DLIR-H demonstrated significantly improved image quality and fewer non-diagnostic images. The improvement in qualitative image quality was greater for the second most and the less experienced readers compared to the most experienced reader.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document