Can texture features improve the differentiation of infiltrative lung adenocarcinoma appearing as ground glass nodules in contrast-enhanced CT?

2019 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. 126-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Gao ◽  
Ping Xiang ◽  
Jianfeng Ye ◽  
Peipei Pang ◽  
Shiwei Wang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wufei Chen ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
Dingbiao Mao ◽  
Xiaojun Ge ◽  
Jiaofeng Wang ◽  
...  

AbstractControversy and challenges remain regarding the cognition of lung adenocarcinomas presented as subcentimeter ground glass nodules (GGNs). Postoperative lymphatic involvement or intrapulmonary metastasis is found in approximately 15% to 20% of these cases. This study aimed to develop and validate a radiomics signature to identify the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma appearing as subcentimeter ground glass nodules. We retrospectively enrolled 318 subcentimeter GGNs with histopathology-confirmed adenocarcinomas in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIA) and invasive adenocarcinomas (IAC). The radiomics features were extracted from manual segmentation based on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and non-contrast enhanced CT (NCECT) images after imaging preprocessing. The Lasso algorithm was applied to construct radiomics signatures. The predictive performance of radiomics models was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. A radiographic-radiomics combined nomogram was developed to evaluate its clinical utility. The radiomics signature on CECT (AUC: 0.896 [95% CI 0.815–0.977]) performed better than the radiomics signature on NCECT data (AUC: 0.851[95% CI 0.712–0.989]) in the validation set. An individualized prediction nomogram was developed using radiomics model on CECT and radiographic model including type, shape and vascular change. The C index of the nomogram was 0.915 in the training set and 0.881 in the validation set, demonstrating good discrimination. Decision curve analysis (DCA) revealed that the proposed model was clinically useful. The radiomics signature built on CECT could provide additional benefit to promote the preoperative prediction of invasiveness in patients with subcentimeter lung adenocarcinomas.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii93-ii93
Author(s):  
Kate Connor ◽  
Emer Conroy ◽  
Kieron White ◽  
Liam Shiels ◽  
William Gallagher ◽  
...  

Abstract Despite magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) being the gold-standard imaging modality in the glioblastoma (GBM) setting, the availability of rodent MRI scanners is relatively limited. CT is a clinically relevant alternative which is more widely available in the pre-clinic. To study the utility of contrast-enhanced (CE)-CT in GBM xenograft modelling, we optimized CT protocols on two instruments (IVIS-SPECTRUM-CT;TRIUMPH-PET/CT) with/without delivery of contrast. As radiomics analysis may facilitate earlier detection of tumors by CT alone, allowing for deeper analyses of tumor characteristics, we established a radiomic pipeline for extraction and selection of tumor specific CT-derived radiomic features (inc. first order statistics/texture features). U87R-Luc2 GBM cells were implanted orthotopically into NOD/SCID mice (n=25) and tumor growth monitored via weekly BLI. Concurrently mice underwent four rounds of CE-CT (IV iomeprol/iopamidol; 50kV-scan). N=45 CE-CT images were semi-automatically delineated and radiomic features were extracted (Pyradiomics 2.2.0) at each imaging timepoint. Differences between normal and tumor tissue were analyzed using recursive selection. Using either CT instrument/contrast, tumors > 0.4cm3 were not detectable until week-9 post-implantation. Radiomic analysis identified three features (waveletHHH_firstorder_Median, original_glcm_Correlation and waveletLHL_firstorder_Median) at week-3 and -6 which may be early indicators of tumor presence. These features are now being assessed in CE-CT scans collected pre- and post-temozolomide treatment in a syngeneic model of mesenchymal GBM. Nevertheless, BLI is significantly more sensitive than CE-CT (either visually or using radiomic-enhanced CT feature extraction) with luciferase-positive tumors detectable at week-1. In conclusion, U87R-Luc2 tumors > 0.4cm3 are only detectable by Week-8 using CE-CT and either CT instrument studied. Nevertheless, radiomic analysis has defined features which may allow for earlier tumor detection at Week-3, thus expanding the utility of CT in the preclinical setting. Overall, this work supports the discovery of putative prognostic pre-clinical CT-derived radiomic signatures which may ultimately be assessed as early disease markers in patient datasets.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 153601211988316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangjie Yang ◽  
Aidi Gong ◽  
Pei Nie ◽  
Lei Yan ◽  
Wenjie Miao ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate the value of 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography texture analysis (CTTA) models in distinguishing fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fpAML) from chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC). Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 32 fpAMLs and 24 chRCCs. Texture features were extracted from 2D and 3D regions of interest in triphasic CT images. The 2D and 3D CTTA models were constructed with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm and texture scores were calculated. The diagnostic performance of the 2D and 3D CTTA models was evaluated with respect to calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. Results: Of the 177 and 183 texture features extracted from 2D and 3D regions of interest, respectively, 5 2D features and 8 3D features were selected to build 2D and 3D CTTA models. The 2D CTTA model (area under the curve [AUC], 0.811; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.695-0.927) and the 3D CTTA model (AUC, 0.915; 95% CI, 0.838-0.993) showed good discrimination and calibration ( P > .05). There was no significant difference in AUC between the 2 models ( P = .093). Decision curve analysis showed the 3D model outperformed the 2D model in terms of clinical usefulness. Conclusions: The CTTA models based on contrast-enhanced CT images had a high value in differentiating fpAML from chRCC.


Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (32) ◽  
pp. 53664-53674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Liu ◽  
Shichang Liu ◽  
Fangyuan Qu ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
Runfen Cheng ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Schimmer ◽  
M Weininger ◽  
K Hamouda ◽  
C Ritter ◽  
SP Sommer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document