scholarly journals Prediction Model and Risk Stratification Tool for Survival in Patients With CKD

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 417-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander S. Goldfarb-Rumyantzev ◽  
Shiva Gautam ◽  
Ning Dong ◽  
Robert S. Brown
2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 848-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Goldfarb-Rumyantzev ◽  
Shiva Gautam ◽  
Robert S Brown

This study proposed to validate a prediction model and risk-stratification tool of 2-year mortality rates of individuals in the general population suitable for office practice use. A risk indicator (R) derived from data in the literature was based on only 6 variables: to calculate R for an individual, starting with 0, for each year of age above 60, add 0.14; for a male, add 0.9; for diabetes mellitus, add 0.7; for albuminuria >30 mg/g of creatinine, add 0.7; for stage ≥3 chronic kidney disease (CKD), add 0.9; for cardiovascular disease (CVD), add 1.4; or for both CKD and CVD, add 1.7. We developed a univariate logistic regression model predicting 2-year individual mortality rates. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data set (1999–2004 with deaths through 2006) was used as the target for validation. These 12,515 subjects had a mean age of 48.9±18.1 years, 48% males, 9.5% diabetes, 11.7% albuminuria, 6.8% CVD, 5.4% CKD, and 2.8% both CKD and CVD. Using the risk indicator R alone to predict mortality demonstrated good performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.84. Dividing subjects into low-risk (R=0–1.0), low intermediate risk (R>1.0–3.0), high intermediate risk (R>3.0–5.0) or high-risk (R>5.0) categories predicted 2-year mortality rates of 0.52%, 1.44%, 5.19% and 15.24%, respectively, by the prediction model compared with actual mortality rates of 0.29%, 2.48%, 5.13% and 13.40%, respectively. We have validated a model of risk stratification using easily identified clinical characteristics to predict 2-year mortality rates of individuals in the general population. The model demonstrated performance adequate for its potential use for clinical practice and research decisions.


Author(s):  
Massimo Imazio ◽  
Alessandro Andreis ◽  
Marta Lubian ◽  
George Lazaros ◽  
Emilia Lazarou ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 4581-4588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol L. Moore ◽  
Mei Lu ◽  
Faiqa Cheema ◽  
Paola Osaki-Kiyan ◽  
Mary Beth Perri ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTMethicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) is a common cause of bloodstream infection (BSI) and is often associated with invasive infections and high rates of mortality. Vancomycin has remained the mainstay of therapy for serious Gram-positive infections, particularly MRSA BSI; however, therapeutic failures with vancomycin have been increasingly reported. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the factors (patient, strain, infection, and treatment) involved in the etiology and management of MRSA BSI to create a risk stratification tool for clinicians. This study included consecutive patients with MRSA BSI treated with vancomycin over 2 years in an inner-city hospital in Detroit, MI. Classification and regression tree analysis (CART) was used to develop a risk prediction model that characterized vancomycin-treated patients at high risk of clinical failure. Of all factors, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) score, with a cutoff point of 14, was found to be the strongest predictor of failure and was used to split the population into two groups. Forty-seven percent of the population had an APACHE-II score < 14, a value that was associated with low rates of clinical failure (11%) and mortality (4%). Fifty-four percent of the population had an APACHE-II score ≥ 14, which was associated with high rates of clinical failure (35%) and mortality (23%). The risk stratification model identified the interplay of three other predictors of failure, including the vancomycin MIC as determined by Vitek 2 analysis, the risk level of the source of BSI, and the USA300 strain type. This model can be a useful tool for clinicians to predict the likelihood of success or failure in vancomycin-treated patients with MRSA bloodstream infection.


HPB ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S353-S354
Author(s):  
G. Morris-Stiff ◽  
S Shashank Sarvepalli ◽  
N. Gupta ◽  
P. Lal ◽  
M. Matta ◽  
...  

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherif Mehralivand ◽  
Joanna H. Shih ◽  
Soroush Rais-Bahrami ◽  
Aytekin Oto ◽  
Sandra Bednarova ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document