Framework of airfoil max lift-to-drag ratio prediction using hybrid feature mining and Gaussian process regression

Heisenberg exchange spin coupling between metal centers is essential for describing and understanding the electronic structure of many molecular catalysts, metalloenzymes, and molecular magnets for potential application in information technology. We explore the machine-learnability of exchange spin coupling, which has not been studied yet. We employ Gaussian process regression since it can potentially deal with small training sets (as likely associated with the rather complex molecular structures required for exploring spin coupling) and since it provides uncertainty estimates (“error bars”) along with predicted values. We compare a range of descriptors and kernels for 257 small dicopper complexes and find that a simple descriptor based on chemical intuition, consisting only of copper-bridge angles and copper-copper distances, clearly outperforms several more sophisticated descriptors when it comes to extrapolating towards larger experimentally relevant complexes. Exchange spin coupling is similarly easy to learn as the polarizability, while learning dipole moments is much harder. The strength of the sophisticated descriptors lies in their ability to linearize structure-property relationships, to the point that a simple linear ridge regression performs just as well as the kernel-based machine-learning model for our small dicopper data set. The superior extrapolation performance of the simple descriptor is unique to exchange spin coupling, reinforcing the crucial role of choosing a suitable descriptor, and highlighting the interesting question of the role of chemical intuition vs. systematic or automated selection of features for machine learning in chemistry and material science.

Download Full-text

SAMPL6 Challenge Results from pKa Predictions Based on a General Gaussian Process Model

10.26434/chemrxiv.6406505.v2 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Caitlin C. Bannan ◽

David Mobley ◽

A. Geoff Skillman

Keyword(s):

Gaussian Process ◽

Process Model ◽

Molecular Graph ◽

Gaussian Process Regression ◽

Ionization State ◽

Training Set ◽

Physiochemical Properties ◽

Quantile Plots ◽

Physical And Chemical ◽

Good Agreement

<div>A variety of fields would benefit from accurate pK<sub>a</sub> predictions, especially drug design due to the affect a change in ionization state can have on a molecules physiochemical properties.</div><div>Participants in the recent SAMPL6 blind challenge were asked to submit predictions for microscopic and macroscopic pK<sub>a</sub>s of 24 drug like small molecules.</div><div>We recently built a general model for predicting pK<sub>a</sub>s using a Gaussian process regression trained using physical and chemical features of each ionizable group.</div><div>Our pipeline takes a molecular graph and uses the OpenEye Toolkits to calculate features describing the removal of a proton.</div><div>These features are fed into a Scikit-learn Gaussian process to predict microscopic pK<sub>a</sub>s which are then used to analytically determine macroscopic pK<sub>a</sub>s.</div><div>Our Gaussian process is trained on a set of 2,700 macroscopic pK<sub>a</sub>s from monoprotic and select diprotic molecules.</div><div>Here, we share our results for microscopic and macroscopic predictions in the SAMPL6 challenge.</div><div>Overall, we ranked in the middle of the pack compared to other participants, but our fairly good agreement with experiment is still promising considering the challenge molecules are chemically diverse and often polyprotic while our training set is predominately monoprotic.</div><div>Of particular importance to us when building this model was to include an uncertainty estimate based on the chemistry of the molecule that would reflect the likely accuracy of our prediction. </div><div>Our model reports large uncertainties for the molecules that appear to have chemistry outside our domain of applicability, along with good agreement in quantile-quantile plots, indicating it can predict its own accuracy.</div><div>The challenge highlighted a variety of means to improve our model, including adding more polyprotic molecules to our training set and more carefully considering what functional groups we do or do not identify as ionizable. </div>

Download Full-text

Gaussian Process Regression for Estimating Wind Speed From X-band Marine Radar Images

OCEANS 2018 MTS/IEEE Charleston ◽

10.1109/oceans.2018.8604842 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Xinwei Chen ◽

Weimin Huang

Keyword(s):

Wind Speed ◽

Gaussian Process ◽

Gaussian Process Regression ◽

Radar Images ◽

X Band ◽

Marine Radar

Download Full-text

Direct quantum dynamics using variational Gaussian wavepackets and Gaussian process regression

The Journal of Chemical Physics ◽

10.1063/1.5086358 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 150 (4) ◽

pp. 041101 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Iakov Polyak ◽

Gareth W. Richings ◽

Scott Habershon ◽

Peter J. Knowles

Keyword(s):

Gaussian Process ◽

Quantum Dynamics ◽

Gaussian Process Regression

Download Full-text

A Parametric Study of Trailing Edge Flap Implementation on Three Different Airfoils Through an Artificial Neuronal Network

Symmetry ◽

10.3390/sym12050828 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (5) ◽

pp. 828

Author(s):

Igor Rodriguez-Eguia ◽

Iñigo Errasti ◽

Unai Fernandez-Gamiz ◽

Jesús María Blanco ◽

Ekaitz Zulueta ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Aerodynamic Coefficients ◽

Trailing Edge ◽

High Lift ◽

Trailing Edge Flaps ◽

Artificial Neural Network Ann ◽

Lift And Drag ◽

Artificial Neuronal Network ◽

Naca 0012 ◽

Drag Ratio ◽

Lift To Drag Ratio

Trailing edge flaps (TEFs) are high-lift devices that generate changes in the lift and drag coefficients of an airfoil. A large number of 2D simulations are performed in this study, in order to measure these changes in aerodynamic coefficients and to analyze them for a given Reynolds number. Three different airfoils, namely NACA 0012, NACA 64(3)-618, and S810, are studied in relation to three combinations of the following parameters: angle of attack, flap angle (deflection), and flaplength. Results are in concordance with the aerodynamic results expected when studying a TEF on an airfoil, showing the effect exerted by the three parameters on both aerodynamic coefficients lift and drag. Depending on whether the airfoil flap is deployed on either the pressure zone or the suction zone, the lift-to-drag ratio, CL/CD, will increase or decrease, respectively. Besides, the use of a larger flap length will increase the higher values and decrease the lower values of the CL/CD ratio. In addition, an artificial neural network (ANN) based prediction model for aerodynamic forces was built through the results obtained from the research.

Download Full-text