SSI effects on seismic demand of reinforced concrete moment resisting frames

2018 ◽  
Vol 173 ◽  
pp. 559-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romeo Tomeo ◽  
Dimitris Pitilakis ◽  
Antonio Bilotta ◽  
Emidio Nigro
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Seismic Demand ◽  
Moment Resisting Frames ◽  
Moment Resisting

scholarly journals Experimental Study on Seismic Retrofitting of Reinforced Concrete Frames Using Welded Concrete-Filled Steel Tubes

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (20) ◽  
pp. 7061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyong Min Ro ◽  
Min Sook Kim ◽  
Young Hak Lee
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Seismic Performance ◽  
Seismic Energy ◽  
Maximum Load ◽  
Steel Tube ◽  
Seismic Retrofitting ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Frame ◽  
Concrete Frame ◽  
Moment Resisting Frames ◽  
Moment Resisting

Buildings constructed with non-seismic details are at risk of damage and collapse when an earthquake occurs due to a lack of strength, stiffness, and ductility. For reinforced concrete (RC) moment-resisting frames, seismic retrofitting methods that can enhance strength or ductility should be applied. However, such strategies have many disadvantages related to constructability, serviceability, securing integrity, and cost. In this paper, a welded concrete-filled steel tube (WCFST) system was examined in order to resolve the problems of the existing seismic retrofitting methods for RC moment-resisting frames. To evaluate the seismic performance of the proposed system, two specimens, one with non-seismic details and another reinforced with a WCFST seismic system, were manufactured for the cyclic loading tests. As a result of the experiments, the specimen retrofitted with the WCFST system showed maximum load, effective stiffness, and energy dissipation capacity values approximately 3, 2, and 2.5 times greater, respectively, than those obtained from the existing reinforced concrete frame specimen. The experimental results indicate that the proposed WCFST system is expected to be effective at improving the seismic performance by enhancing both the strength of the existing reinforced concrete frame structures and the dissipation of the seismic energy.

EVALUATION OF THE DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS FOR SEISMIC DESIGN OF MULTI-STORY BUILDINGS

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aya Aboelhamd ◽  
Aman Mwafy ◽  
Suliman Gargoum
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Seismic Design ◽  
Building Codes ◽  
Fundamental Period ◽  
Braced Frames ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Structural Dynamic ◽  
Moment Resisting Frames ◽  
Moment Resisting ◽  
Period Data

The fundamental period of vibration is a critical structural dynamic characteristic in seismic design. Several expressions for the calculation of the fundamental period have been recommended by different building codes and previous studies. However, further studies are still needed to evaluate the design expressions used for the calculation of the fundamental periods and assess the need for further refinement. In this study, comprehensive fundamental period data from two sources is collected and compared with different formulas from building codes and previous studies. The first data set is obtained from 147 instrumented buildings with various lateral force resisting systems (LFRSs). The second set of period data are collected from the dynamic response simulations of selected structures. Different LFRSs are considered, including steel moment resisting frames (SMRFs), reinforced concrete moment resisting frames (RCMRFs), reinforced concrete shear walls (RCSWs), concentrically braced frames (CBFs), eccentrically braced frames (EBFs), masonry structures and pre-cast structures. The correlations between the derived period expressions with those recommended by the design provisions show that the code approach is conservative enough for SMRFs, CBFs, masonry buildings and pre-cast structures. For RCMRFs, EBFs and RCSWs, the design code is slightly unconservative for low-rise buildings. The outcomes of the study help to arrive at more efficient and cost-effective seismic design of buildings with different characteristics.

scholarly journals Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete moment resisting frames with/without beam-column joint detailing

2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Naveed Ahmad ◽  
Muhammad Rizwan ◽  
Muhammad Ashraf ◽  
Akhtar Naeem Khan ◽  
Qaisar Ali
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Seismic Intensity ◽  
Shear Reinforcement ◽  
Dynamic Reliability ◽  
Moment Resisting Frames ◽  
Collapse Probability ◽  
Seismic Collapse ◽  
Moment Resisting ◽  
Column Joint

FEMA-P695 procedure was applied for seismic collapse safety evaluation of reinforced concrete moment resisting frames with/without beam-column joint detailing common in Pakistan. The deficient frame lacks shear reinforcement in joints and uses concrete of low compressive strength. Shake-table tests were performed on 1:3 reduced scale two-story models, to understand the progressive inelastic response of chosen frames and calibrate the inelastic finite-element based models. The seismic design factors i.e. response modification coefficient, overstrength, ductility, and displacement amplification factors (R, W0, Rμ, Cd) were quantified. Response modification factor R = 7.05 was obtained for the frame with beam-column joint detailing while R = 5.30 was obtained for the deficient frame. The corresponding deflection amplification factor Cd/R was found equal to 0.82 and 1.03, respectively. A suite of design spectrum compatible accelerograms was obtained from PEER strong ground motions for incremental dynamic analysis of numerical models. Collapse fragility functions were developed using a probabilistic nonlinear dynamic reliability-based method. The collapse margin ratio (CMR) was calculated as the ratio of seismic intensity corresponding to the 50th percentile collapse probability to the seismic intensity corresponding to the MCE level ground motions. It was critically compared with the acceptable CMR (i.e. the CMR computed with reference to a seismic intensity corresponding to the 10% collapse probability instead of MCE level ground motions). Frame with shear reinforcement in beam-column joints has achieved CMR 11% higher than the acceptable thus passing the criterion. However, the deficient frame achieved CMR 29% less than the conforming frame. This confirms the efficacy of beam-column joint detailing in reducing collapse risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document