Biological effect and chemical monitoring of Watch List substances in European surface waters: Steroidal estrogens and diclofenac – Effect-based methods for monitoring frameworks

In this study, a screening of 26 selected antimicrobials using liquid chromatography coupled to a tandem mass spectrometry method in two Polish wastewater treatment plants and their receiving surface waters was provided. The highest average concentrations of metronidazole (7400 ng/L), ciprofloxacin (4300 ng/L), vancomycin (3200 ng/L), and sulfamethoxazole (3000 ng/L) were observed in influent of WWTP2. Ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole were the most dominant antimicrobials in influent and effluent of both WWTPs. In the sludge samples the highest mean concentrations were found for ciprofloxacin (up to 28 μg/g) and norfloxacin (up to 5.3 μg/g). The removal efficiency of tested antimicrobials was found to be more than 50% for both WWTPs. However, the presence of antimicrobials influenced their concentrations in the receiving waters. The highest antimicrobial resistance risk was estimated in influent of WWTPs for azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, and trimethoprim and in the sludge samples for the following antimicrobials: azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, norfloxacin, trimethoprim, ofloxacin, and tetracycline. The high environmental risk for exposure to azithromycin, clarithromycin, and sulfamethoxazole to both cyanobacteria and eukaryotic species in effluents and/or receiving water was noted. Following the obtained results, we suggest extending the watch list of the Water Framework Directive for Union-wide monitoring with sulfamethoxazole.

Download Full-text

Endocrine disrupters in the aquatic environment: the Austrian approach - ARCEM

Water Science & Technology ◽

10.2166/wst.2004.0340 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 50 (5) ◽

pp. 293-300 ◽

Cited By ~ 19

Author(s):

W. Bursch ◽

M. Fuerhacker ◽

M. Gemeiner ◽

B. Grillitsch ◽

A. Jungbauer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Waste Water ◽

Risk Assessment ◽

Risk Management ◽

Drinking Water ◽

Water Treatment ◽

Bisphenol A ◽

Surface Waters ◽

Endocrine Disrupters ◽

Nonylphenol Ethoxylates ◽

Chemical Monitoring

A consortium of Austrian scientists (ARCEM) carried out a multidisciplinary environmental study on Austrian surface and ground waters including chemical monitoring, bioindication, risk assessment and risk management for selected endocrine disrupters: 17β-estradiol, estriol, estrone, 17α-ethinylestradiol, 4-nonylphenol, 4-nonylphenol ethoxylates (4-NP1EO, 4-NP2EO) and their degradation products, ocytlphenol, ocytlphenol ethoxylates (OP1EO, OP2EO) as well as bisphenol A. To obtain data representative for Austria, a material flow analysis served to select relevant compounds and water samples were collected monthly over one year at those sites routinely used in Austrian water quality control. The following results were obtained and conclusions drawn:1. Chemical monitoring: As compared to other countries, relatively low levels of pollution with endocrine disrupters were detected.2. Bioindication: In the surface waters under study, male fish showed significant signs of feminization and demasculinization (increased production of the egg-yolk protein and histological changes of the gonads.3. Risk assessment: For humans, exposure via either drinking water abstraction (ground water) or fish consumption was considered. The exposure levels of the compounds under study were below those considered to result in human health risks. Likewise, for bisphenol A and octylphenols, there was no indication for risk posed upon the aquatic environment (fish). However, nonylphenol or 17a-ethinylestradiol exposure along with results of bioindication (2) suggest a borderline estrogenic activity in a considerable number of surface waters. Consequently the emissions of these substances into the surface waters affected have to be reduced.4. Risk management: Waste water treatment experiments revealed a positive correlation between the removal rate of endocrine disrupters from the waste water and the sludge retention time in the treatment plants. These substances are removed to a higher extend at low loaded plants designed for nutrient removal than at plants that remove carbon and/or employ nitrification only. As to drinking water treatment, chlorine dioxide and ozone were found to eliminate all investigated substances, except nonylphenol ethoxylates. (For the complete study see: www.arcem.at)

Download Full-text

Development of an analytical method for the simultaneous determination of the 17 EU Watch List compounds in surface waters: a Spanish case study

Environmental Chemistry ◽

10.1071/en18101 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 15 (8) ◽

pp. 493

Author(s):

José Luis Malvar ◽

Concepción Abril ◽

Julia Martín ◽

Juan Luis Santos ◽

Irene Aparicio ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Simultaneous Determination ◽

Organic Pollutants ◽

Surface Waters ◽

Analytical Method ◽

Limit Of Detection ◽

Solid Phase ◽

Anthropogenic Activities ◽

Watch List ◽

The Eu

Environmental contextIn 2015, the European Union issued a Watch List of organic pollutants resulting from anthropogenic activities. A major obstacle to controlling these pollutants in the environment is the difficulty of their simultaneous measurement at low concentrations. We developed an analytical method for the simultaneous determination in surface water of the 17 pollutants included in the EU Watch List. AbstractA multi-class method was developed for the simultaneous determination of the 17 organic pollutants included in the EU Decision 2015/495 regarding surface waters. The target analytes were three estrogens, four pharmaceuticals, a food additive, a solar filter and eight pesticides. The target compounds were extracted through solid-phase extraction with Oasis HLB cartridges. Determination was carried out by high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS/MS). All compounds were satisfactorily determined in one single injection, with a chromatographic run time of only 20min. The limit of detection (LOD) of the proposed method was in the range of 0.08–13ngL−1. For most of the target compounds, except for 17α-ethinylestradiol, 17β-estradiol and estrone, the LOD values were equal or below those required by the EU Decision 2015/495. Accuracy was in the range of 69–120%, whereas inter-day variability was below 20% in all cases. The validated method was applied to assess the presence of these compounds in Mediterranean surface waters. Samples were collected from 18 sampling sites located in the south of Spain. Up to 14 compounds were detected, among them, the pharmaceutical compounds were the pollutants most frequently detected at concentration levels up to 1158ngL−1 (diclofenac).

Download Full-text

Chemical Monitoring of Surface Waters

The Water Framework Directive - Water Quality Measurements ◽

10.1002/9780470716090.ch2 ◽

2009 ◽

pp. 11-28

Author(s):

Peter Lepom ◽

Georg Hanke

Keyword(s):

Surface Waters ◽

Chemical Monitoring

Download Full-text

Habitat Association of Klebsiella Species

Infection Control ◽

10.1017/s0195941700062603 ◽

1985 ◽

Vol 6 (2) ◽

pp. 52-58 ◽

Cited By ~ 111

Author(s):

Susan T. Bagley

Keyword(s):

Drinking Water ◽

Gastrointestinal Tract ◽

Surface Waters ◽

Industrial Effluents ◽

Opportunistic Pathogen ◽

Habitat Associations ◽

Habitat Association ◽

Klebsiella Species ◽

Almost All ◽

Polluted Waters

AbstractThe genus Klebsiella is seemingly ubiquitous in terms of its habitat associations. Klebsiella is a common opportunistic pathogen for humans and other animals, as well as being resident or transient flora (particularly in the gastrointestinal tract). Other habitats include sewage, drinking water, soils, surface waters, industrial effluents, and vegetation. Until recently, almost all these Klebsiella have been identified as one species, ie, K. pneumoniae. However, phenotypic and genotypic studies have shown that “K. pneumoniae” actually consists of at least four species, all with distinct characteristics and habitats. General habitat associations of Klebsiella species are as follows: K. pneumoniae—humans, animals, sewage, and polluted waters and soils; K. oxytoca—frequent association with most habitats; K. terrigena— unpolluted surface waters and soils, drinking water, and vegetation; K. planticola—sewage, polluted surface waters, soils, and vegetation; and K. ozaenae/K. rhinoscleromatis—infrequently detected (primarily with humans).

Download Full-text

Identifying Sources of Sulfate Aerosols Reaching Whiteface Mountain, NY

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100117546 ◽

1985 ◽

Vol 43 ◽

pp. 98-101

Author(s):

James S. Webber

Keyword(s):

Trace Metals ◽

Acid Deposition ◽

Surface Waters ◽

Dry Deposition ◽

Coal Combustion ◽

Public Awareness ◽

Sulfate Aerosols ◽

Wet And Dry Deposition ◽

Whiteface Mountain ◽

Toxic Trace Metals

INTRODUCTION“Acid rain” and “acid deposition” are terms no longer confined to the lexicon of atmospheric scientists and 1imnologists. Public awareness of and concern over this phenomenon, particularly as it affects acid-sensitive regions of North America, have increased dramatically in the last five years. Temperate ecosystems are suffering from decreased pH caused by acid deposition. Human health may be directly affected by respirable sulfates and by the increased solubility of toxic trace metals in acidified waters. Even man's monuments are deteriorating as airborne acids etch metal and stone features.Sulfates account for about two thirds of airborne acids with wet and dry deposition contributing equally to acids reaching surface waters or ground. The industrial Midwest is widely assumed to be the source of most sulfates reaching the acid-sensitive Northeast since S02 emitted as a byproduct of coal combustion in the Midwest dwarfs S02 emitted from all sources in the Northeast.

Download Full-text