Prediction of sediment heavy metal at the Australian Bays using newly developed hybrid artificial intelligence models

2021 ◽  
Vol 268 ◽  
pp. 115663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suraj Kumar Bhagat ◽  
Tiyasha Tiyasha ◽  
Salih Muhammad Awadh ◽  
Tran Minh Tung ◽  
Ali H. Jawad ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 152-152
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Sretenovic ◽  
Radisa Jovanovic ◽  
Vojislav Novakovic ◽  
Natasa Nord ◽  
Branislav Zivkovic

Currently, in the building sector there is an increase in energy use due to the increased demand for indoor thermal comfort. Proper energy planning based on a real measurement data is a necessity. In this study, we developed and evaluated hybrid artificial intelligence models for the prediction of the daily heating energy use. Building energy use is defined by significant number of influencing factors, while many of them are hard to define and quantify. For heating energy use modelling, complex relationship between the input and output variables is not strictly linear nor non-linear. The main idea of this paper was to divide the heat demand prediction problem into the linear and the non-linear part (residuals) by using different statistical methods for the prediction. The expectations were that the joint hybrid model, could outperform the individual predictors. Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) was selected for the linear modelling, while the non-linear part was predicted using Feedforward (FFNN) and Radial Basis (RBFN) neural network. The hybrid model prediction consisted of the sum of the outputs of the linear and the non-linear model. The results showed that the hybrid FFNN model and the hybrid RBFN model achieved better results than each of the individual FFNN and RBFN neural networks and MLR on the same dataset. It was shown that this hybrid approach improved the accuracy of artificial intelligence models.


Author(s):  
Anurag Malik ◽  
Anil Kumar ◽  
Yazid Tikhamarine ◽  
Doudja Souag-Gamane ◽  
Özgur Kişi

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert T. Young ◽  
Kristen Fernandez ◽  
Jacob Pfau ◽  
Rasika Reddy ◽  
Nhat Anh Cao ◽  
...  

AbstractArtificial intelligence models match or exceed dermatologists in melanoma image classification. Less is known about their robustness against real-world variations, and clinicians may incorrectly assume that a model with an acceptable area under the receiver operating characteristic curve or related performance metric is ready for clinical use. Here, we systematically assessed the performance of dermatologist-level convolutional neural networks (CNNs) on real-world non-curated images by applying computational “stress tests”. Our goal was to create a proxy environment in which to comprehensively test the generalizability of off-the-shelf CNNs developed without training or evaluation protocols specific to individual clinics. We found inconsistent predictions on images captured repeatedly in the same setting or subjected to simple transformations (e.g., rotation). Such transformations resulted in false positive or negative predictions for 6.5–22% of skin lesions across test datasets. Our findings indicate that models meeting conventionally reported metrics need further validation with computational stress tests to assess clinic readiness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document