scholarly journals Integrating complementary medicine into a clinical guideline for diabetes palliative care.

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 101909
Author(s):  
Jennifer Hunter ◽  
Susan Arentz ◽  
Gary Deed ◽  
Trisha Dunning
ISRN Nursing ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Falkensteiner ◽  
Franco Mantovan ◽  
Irene Müller ◽  
Christa Them

A considerable number of cancer patients use complementary medicine therapies in order to alleviate different symptoms such as pain, anxiety, and depression, occurring in connection with cancer. This paper explores the question to what extent massage therapies are able to reduce the amount of pain, anxiety, and depression. For this purpose, a systematic literature analysis was carried out in the electronic databases and specialist journals. There is already evidence that massage therapies can influence the symptoms of pain, anxiety, and depression in a positive way.


2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 932-933
Author(s):  
Abbas Heydari ◽  
Hassan Sharifi ◽  
Ahmad Bagheri Moghaddam

According to the World Health Organization, the main mission of palliative care is to optimize the quality of life of patients with serious chronic disease, as well as their caregivers, by providing biopsychosociospiritual care. However, historically, the primary focus of palliative care is on providing care only for cancer diseases. Based on the current literature, it is assumed that palliative care is not provided for many chronic diseases on a regular basis and in many cases, a clinical guideline does not exist for providing palliative care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 4405-4412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilene Filbet ◽  
Janet Schloss ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Maret ◽  
Helene Diezel ◽  
Per J. Palmgren ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Kremeike ◽  
Gerrit Frerich ◽  
Vanessa Romotzky ◽  
Kathleen Bostroem ◽  
Thomas Dojan ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: Although desire to die (DD) of varying intensity and permanence is frequent in patients with advanced cancer and those receiving palliative care, uncertainty exists concerning appropriate therapeutic responses to it. To support health professionals in dealing with patients´ potential DD, a training program and a semi-structured clinical interview guideline was developed. This study aimed for a revision of and consensus building on the clinical guideline to support proactively addressing DD and routine exploration of death and dying distress. Methods: Within a sequential mixed methods design, we invited 16 palliative patients to participate in semi-structured interviews and 377 (inter-)national experts to attend a two-round Delphi process. Interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis and an agreement consensus for the Delphi was determined according to predefined criteria. Results : 11 (69%) patients from different settings participated in face-to-face interviews. As key issues for conversations on DD they pointed out the relationship between professionals and patients, the setting and support from external experts, if required. A set of 149 (40%) experts (132/89% from Germany, 17/11% from 9 other countries) evaluated ten domains of the clinical guideline. There was immediate consensus on nine domains concerning conversation design, suggestions for (self-)reflection, and further recommended action. The one domain in which consensus was not achieved until the second round was “proactively addressing DD”. Conclusions : We have provided the first semi-structured clinical guideline to identify and address DD and to respond therapeutically – based on evidence, patients’ views and consensus among (inter-)national professional experts. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (No. DRKS00012988).


2020 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002269
Author(s):  
Amie Steel ◽  
Janet Schloss ◽  
Helene Diezel ◽  
Per J Palmgren ◽  
Jean Baptiste Maret ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe paucity of empirical research examining complementary medicine (CM) use in palliative care in France compared with other countries results in a gap in scientific knowledge. This study aims to describe the frequency and the cause of palliative care patients consulting with a CM clinician along with the conventional physicians.MethodsThis study is an observational cross-sectional survey conducted in three palliative care centres in Lyon, France, between July 2017 and May 2018: two tertiary hospitals and one palliative care unit in a private hospital. Inpatients and outpatients visiting the palliative care clinics with a primary diagnosis of cancer were invited to participate in the study. Using a 19-item paper-based survey instrument, we collected data on the participants’ personal characteristics, health service utilisation and attitudes towards CM.ResultsFrom the 138 participants meeting the inclusion criteria, 100 (72.4%) were included in the study. On average, they were 62.9 years old (SD 12.4) and the majority were women (60%). The primary cancer site was mostly colorectal (29.0%), breast (15.0%) and gynaecological (11.0%). The most commonly visited CM clinician was the aromatherapist (72.7%), recording more than six consultations (78.1%) for symptom management (21.9%). Visits to an osteopath were reported by 28.6% of patients, and 45.8% of osteopathy users reported visiting an osteopath more than six times for symptom management (62.5%). Participants visiting a naturopath (15.3%) reported less than four visits and indicated symptom management as the most common reason (76.9%).ConclusionsOur findings show a substantial proportion of palliative care patients visit CM clinicians and primarily seek symptom management from CM clinical care.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
B. Schoop ◽  
M. Schlaeppi ◽  
S. Eychmueller ◽  
N. Schneider ◽  
U. Wolf ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document