cancer site
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

413
(FIVE YEARS 188)

H-INDEX

37
(FIVE YEARS 5)

Objective: We explore the association between demographics and the most prevalent cancers in the United States by analyzing empirical data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, with indicators like cancer site, cancer incidence rate, relative survival rate, death rate, and demographic and lifestyle factors. Identifying cancer-related factors can contribute to improvements in treatment and management of the disease. Method: We use visual analytics to show behavioral factors and age to be associated with increasing incidence rates. Principal Results: Females are more susceptible to breast and males to prostate cancer. As a preventive measure, national healthcare entities, insurance companies and the government should consider both gender and age factors and monitor behavioral health measures like drugs and diet, in evaluating cancer treatment/mitigation. Main conclusions: Preventive care combined with improved outcomes and reduced costs is necessary. We offer implications for all developed countries in identifying key areas to target and manage public health.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Philippe Wind ◽  
Zoe ap ap Thomas ◽  
Marie Laurent ◽  
Thomas Aparicio ◽  
Matthieu Siebert ◽  
...  

We aimed to assess the prognostic value of the pre-operative GRADE score for long-term survival among older adults undergoing major surgery for digestive or non-breast gynaecological cancers. Between 2013 and 2019, 136 consecutive older adults with cancer were prospectively recruited from the PF-EC cohort study before major cancer surgery and underwent a geriatric assessment. The GRADE score includes weight loss, gait speed at the threshold of 0.8 m/s, cancer site and cancer extension. The primary outcome was post-operative 5-year mortality. Patients were classified as low risk (GRADE ≤ 8) or high risk (GRADE > 8) on the basis of the median score. A Cox multivariate proportional hazards regression model was performed to assess the association between pre-operative factors and 5-year mortality expressed by adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% CI. The median age was 80 years, 52% were men, 73% had colorectal cancer. The 30-day post-operative severe complication rate (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) was 37%. The 5-year post-operative mortality rate was 34.5%. A GRADE score ≥ 8 (aHR = 2.64 [1.34–5.21], p = 0.0002) was associated with post-operative mortality after adjustment for Body Mass Index < 21 kg/m2 and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living <3/4. By combining very simple geriatric and cancer parameters, the pre-operative GRADE score provides a discriminant prognosis and could help to choose the most suitable treatment strategy for older cancer patients, avoiding under or over-treatment.


Author(s):  
Sven H. Loosen ◽  
Karel Kostev ◽  
Mark Luedde ◽  
Tom Luedde ◽  
Christoph Roderburg

Abstract Purpose There is a growing body of evidence suggesting a decisive involvement of the human lipid metabolism in cancer development. However, clinical data on the association between blood triglyceride or cholesterol levels including the cholesterol transporters high-density and low-density lipoproteins (LDL, HDL) and cancer incidence have remained inconclusive. Here, we investigated the association between blood triglyceride as well as total, LDL and HDL cholesterol levels and cancer among outpatients from Germany. Methods 61,936 patients with available blood lipid values were identified from the IQVIA Disease Analyzer database and followed up between 2005 and 2019. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to study the association between lipid values and cancer. Results The probability of cancer was significantly lower among patients with elevated total cholesterol concentrations and higher in patients with decreased HDL serum levels. In contrast, serum concentrations of LDL and triglycerides had no impact on cancer risk. In cancer site-stratified analyses, we observed a trend towards higher rates of cancers from digestive organs, breast, skin cancer, urinary tract and cancers from lymphoid and hematopoietic tissue in patients with HDL values < 35 mg/dl, while a negative association between total cholesterol > 250 mg/dl and respiratory organ as well as urinary tract cancers was observed. Conclusion Our data strongly support the hypothesis that serum-specific lipid profiles are positively associated with cancer.


Author(s):  
Christoph Roderburg ◽  
Sven H. Loosen ◽  
Laura Hoyer ◽  
Tom Luedde ◽  
Karel Kostev

Abstract Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) has recently been associated with an increased incidence of such digestive tract malignancies as gastric or colorectal cancer. However, systematic data on the prevalence of DM among digestive tract cancer entities, especially in terms of geographic distributions, are lacking. Methods We used the Oncology Dynamics database (IQVIA) to identify a total of 80,193 patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer (5845 esophagus, 20,806 stomach, 38,138 colon, and 15,414 rectum cancer patients) from eight European and Asian countries. Results The overall prevalence of DM among all digestive tract cancer patients was 14.8% (11,866/80,193). In terms of cancer site, DM prevalence was highest in patients with colon (15.5%) or rectal (15.3%) cancer and lowest in patients with esophageal cancer (12.0%). Interestingly, we observed significant differences in DM prevalence between countries. Spain (27.8%, 31.3%) and South Korea (21.0%, 27.9%) had the highest prevalence of DM among gastric and colon cancer patients, while DM prevalence in esophageal (18.8%) and rectal (38.0%) cancer patients was highest in Germany. Conclusion Our data revealed a high prevalence of DM among digestive tract cancer patients in Europe and Asia, and showed that DM prevalence varies among digestive tract cancer sites as well as countries.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0260358
Author(s):  
Justin G. Trogdon ◽  
Krutika Amin ◽  
Parul Gupta ◽  
Benjamin Y. Urick ◽  
Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes ◽  
...  

Background We conducted a mediation analysis of the provider team’s role in changes to chronic condition medication adherence among cancer survivors. Methods We used a retrospective, longitudinal cohort design following Medicare beneficiaries from 18-months before through 24-months following cancer diagnosis. We included beneficiaries aged ≥66 years newly diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung or prostate cancer and using medication for non-insulin anti-diabetics, statins, and/or anti-hypertensives and similar individuals without cancer from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data, 2008–2014. Chronic condition medication adherence was defined as a proportion of days covered ≥ 80%. Provider team structure was measured using two factors capturing the number of providers seen and the historical amount of patient sharing among providers. Linear regressions relying on within-survivor variation were run separately for each cancer site, chronic condition, and follow-up period. Results The number of providers and patient sharing among providers increased after cancer diagnosis relative to the non-cancer control group. Changes in provider team complexity explained only small changes in medication adherence. Provider team effects were statistically insignificant in 13 of 17 analytic samples with significant changes in adherence. Statistically significant provider team effects were small in magnitude (<0.5 percentage points). Conclusions Increased complexity in the provider team associated with cancer diagnosis did not lead to meaningful reductions in medication adherence. Interventions aimed at improving chronic condition medication adherence should be targeted based on the type of cancer and chronic condition and focus on other provider, systemic, or patient factors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Thompson ◽  
Lynn Chollet-Hinton ◽  
John Keighley ◽  
Audrey Chang ◽  
Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rural residence is commonly thought to be a risk factor for poor cancer outcomes. However, a number of studies have reported seemingly conflicting information regarding cancer outcome disparities with respect to rural residence, with some suggesting that the disparity is not present and others providing inconsistent evidence that either urban or rural residence is associated with poorer outcomes. We suggest a simple explanation for these seeming contradictions: namely that rural cancer outcome disparities are related to factors that occur differentially at a local level, such as environmental exposures, lack of access to care or screening, and socioeconomic factors, which differ by type of cancer. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining ten cancers treated at the University of Kansas Medical Center from 2011 to 2018, with individuals from either rural or urban residences. We defined urban residences as those in a county with a U.S. Department of Agriculture Urban Influence Code (UIC) of 1 or 2, with all other residences defines a rural. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to create a pseudo-sample balanced for covariates deemed likely to affect the outcomes modeled with cumulative link and weighted Cox-proportional hazards models. Results We found that rural residence is not a simple risk factor but rather appears to play a complex role in cancer outcome disparities. Specifically, rural residence is associated with higher stage at diagnosis and increased survival hazards for colon cancer but decreased risk for lung cancer compared to urban residence. Conclusion Many cancers are affected by unique social and environmental factors that may vary between rural and urban residents, such as access to care, diet, and lifestyle. Our results show that rurality can increase or decrease risk, depending on cancer site, which suggests the need to consider the factors connected to rurality that influence this complex pattern. Thus, we argue that such disparities must be studied at the local level to identify and design appropriate interventions to improve cancer outcomes.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0260026
Author(s):  
Kensuke Yoshida ◽  
Yasumitsu Kodama ◽  
Yusuke Tanaka ◽  
Kyongsun Pak ◽  
Marie Soga ◽  
...  

Objectives This retrospective study examined how a pharmacist-involved education program in a multidisciplinary team (PEMT) for oral mucositis (OM) affected head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Materials and methods Total samples data of 53 patients during the stipulated timeframe were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records from February 2017 to January 2019. We compared the presence/absence of OM (OM: yes/no) between patients with and without PEMT (PEMT: yes/no) as the primary endpoint and OM severity as the secondary endpoint. The following information was surveyed: age, gender, weight loss, steroid or immunosuppressant use, hematological values (albumin, white blood cell count, blood platelets, and neutrophils), cancer grade, primary cancer site, type and use of mouthwash and moisturizer, opioid use (yes/no, days until the start of opioid use, and dose, switch to tape), and length of hospital day (LOD). The two groups were compared using Fisher’s exact test for qualitative data and the Mann-Whitney U test for quantitative data, and a significance level of p<0.05 was set. Results The group managed by PEMT had significantly lower weight loss and a significantly lower incidence of local anesthetic and opioid use and switch to tape compared with the group not managed by PEMT (p<0.05). The two groups showed no significant difference in OM (yes/no) or OM severity. The PEMT group had significantly shorter LOD at 57 (53–64) days compared with the non-PEMT group at 63.5 (57–68) days (p<0.05). Conclusions Our results showed that PEMT did not improve OM (yes/no) or OM severity in HNC patients undergoing CCRT. However, the PEMT group had a lower incidence of grades 3 and 4 OM than the non-PEMT group, although not significantly. In addition, PEMT contributed to oral pain relief and the lowering of the risk for OM by reduction in weight loss.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi41-vi42
Author(s):  
Bente Skeie ◽  
Per Øyvind Enger ◽  
Geir Olve Skeie ◽  
Jan Ingemann Heggdal

Abstract The use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases are increasing. Response assessment is challenging and the clinical significance of radiological response and retreatments are poorly defined. Ninety-seven patients with a total of 406 brain metastases were followed prospectively for 10 years or until death. Volume changes over time and clinical outcome in response to first time SRS and SRS retreatments were analyzed. Tumors grew significantly before (p = 0.004), but shrunk at 1 and 3 months (p = 0.001) following SRS. Four response-patterns of were observed; tumors either continuously reduced in size (A, 62%), pseudo-progressed (PP, B, 13%), temporarily reduced in size (C, 24%), or grew continuously (D, 2%); corresponding to 75% local control (LC) at initial SRS. Predictors for LC were primary cancer site (p = 0.001), tumor volume (p = 0.002) and target cover ratio (p = 0.005). Subsequent SRS for new lesions resulted in 94% LC (87% A) and repeat-SRS for local failures in 80% LC (57% B), predicted by higher prescribed dose, p = 0.001 and p = 0.042, respectively. Overall survival was only 4.5 months if A-response for all lesions, 13.3 months if at least one B-response, 17.1 months if retreated C- or D-response (p &lt; 0.001), (7.5 and 4.7 months if untreated). Quality of life (p = 0.003), steroid use (p = 0.019) and prior whole brain radiotherapy (p = 0.026) were predictors for survival. There are 4 response patterns to SRS predicted by tumor size, primary cancer site, target cover ratio and prescribed dose. Long-term survivors experienced a higher incidence of PP and were more often retreated for new lesions and local failures. The immune response induced by PP seems beneficial but further studies are needed.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-hsien Huang ◽  
Ting-Chun Lin ◽  
Ming-Yu Lien ◽  
Fu-Ming Cheng ◽  
Kai-Chiun Li ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundAim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic of tumor volume reduction rate (TVRR) status post induction chemotherapy (IC) in LA-HNSCC.MethodsPatients with newly diagnosed LA-HNSCC from year 2007 to 2016 at a single center were included in this retrospective study. All patients had received IC as TPF (taxotere, platinum, fluorouracil) followed by daily definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for 70 Gy in 35 fractions concurrent with or without cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Tumor volume reduction rate of the primary tumor (TVRR-T) and lymph node (TVRR-N) was measured and calculated by contrast-enhanced CT images at diagnosis, and one month after final IC cycle, and analyzed though a univariate and multivariate Cox regression model.ResultsNinety patients of the primary cancer sites at hypopharynx (31/90, 34.4%), oropharynx (29/90, 32.2%), oral cavity (19/90, 21.1%) and larynx (11/90, 12.2%) were included in this study, with a median follow-up time interval of 3.9 years. In univariate Cox regression analysis, the TVRR-T as the only variable showed a significant difference for disease-free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63 to 0.96; P = 0.02), aside from cancer site, RECIST, age and IC dose. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, The TVRR-T was also an independently significant prognostic factor for DFS (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.97; P = 0.02). At a cutoff value using TVRR-T of 50% in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the DFS was significant higher with TVRR-T ≥ 50% group (log-rank test, p = 0.024), and also a trend of improved OS. (log-rank test, p = 0.069).ConclusionsTVRR-T was related to improved DFS and trend of improved OS. Other factors including patient’s age at diagnosis, the primary cancer site, and RECIST, were not significantly related to DFS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A58-A58
Author(s):  
Sara Pollan ◽  
Bethany Remeniuk ◽  
Arezoo Hanifi ◽  
Kristin Roman ◽  
Bei Hopkins ◽  
...  

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most diagnosed cancer in the United States with a projected 52,980 deaths in 2021.1 Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) CRCs with deficiencies in mismatch repair (MMR) are significantly associated with positive response to immunotherapy and improved outcomes when treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is an effective biomarker of MSI-H status to identify CRC patients who will respond to treatment, however, reproducible quantification of programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 in the tumor microenvironment (TME) across laboratory sites has been under-reported.2–3 In this study, our group directly addressed this issue by interrogating PD-1/PD-L1 cross-site at Akoya Biosciences and NeoGenomics Laboratories by employing the MOTiF™ PD-1/PD-L1 Panel kit along with the Vectra Polaris imaging system.MethodsSerial sections from 40 CRC samples with known MSI status were stained at Akoya and NeoGenomics Laboratories using a modified MOTiF PD-1/PD-L1 Lung Panel Kit on the Leica BOND RX. Sections were scanned using the Vectra Polaris imaging system at both sites. Inter-site staining reproducibility was assessed using image analysis algorithms developed with inForm tissue analysis software. Cell counts and densities were calculated using the R-script package PhenoptrReports and correlations were plotted per marker.ResultsThe average signal intensity for all markers/Opal fluorophores was within the recommended ranges of 10–30 normalized counts, with the exception of Polaris 780, which has an advised range of 1–10. This indicates the protocol stained successfully and reproducibly across all serial sections at both sites. Inter-site concordance analysis of cell densities for each marker yielded an average R2 value of ≥0.70. H-Score of PD-L1 quantified at the cell membrane trended with MSI status (stable/high).ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that the MOTiF PD-1/PD-L1 Panel kit imaged in conjunction with the Vectra Polaris is not only a reliable assay that can be run across different sites, based on the concordant cross-site data, but that re-optimization of the kit allows for the assay panel to be successfully adapted to other cancers, such as CRC, which can then capture biological differences across a multitude of samples.ReferencesAmerican Cancer Society https://www.cancer.org/cancer/colon-rectal-cancer/about/key-statistics.htmlYi M, Jiao D, Xu H, Liu Q, Zhao W, Han X, et al. Biomarkers for predicting efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Mol Cancer 2018;17(1):129Lemery S, Keegan P, Pazdur R. First FDA approval agnostic of cancer site - when a biomarker defines the indication. N Engl J Med 2017;377(15):1409–12.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document