Women's preferences for masculinity in male faces are predicted by pathogen disgust, but not by moral or sexual disgust

In the 1880s, women were barred from voting in all national-level elections, but by 1920 they were going to the polls in nearly thirty countries. What caused this massive change? Contrary to conventional wisdom, it was not because of progressive ideas about women or suffragists' pluck. In most countries, elected politicians fiercely resisted enfranchising women, preferring to extend such rights only when it seemed electorally prudent and necessary to do so. This book demonstrates that the formation of a broad movement across social divides, and strategic alliances with political parties in competitive electoral conditions, provided the leverage that ultimately transformed women into voters. As the book shows, in competitive environments, politicians had incentives to seek out new sources of electoral influence. A broad-based suffrage movement could reinforce those incentives by providing information about women's preferences, and an infrastructure with which to mobilize future female voters. At the same time that politicians wanted to enfranchise women who were likely to support their party, suffragists also wanted to enfranchise women whose political preferences were similar to theirs. In contexts where political rifts were too deep, suffragists who were in favor of the vote in principle mobilized against their own political emancipation. Exploring tensions between elected leaders and suffragists and the uncertainty surrounding women as an electoral group, the book sheds new light on the strategic reasons behind women's enfranchisement.

Download Full-text

Self-other agreement in disgust sensitivity

10.31234/osf.io/dymqk ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Annika Karinen ◽

Joshua M. Tybur ◽

Reinout E. de Vries

Keyword(s):

Personality Traits ◽

Political Attitudes ◽

Romantic Partners ◽

Disgust Sensitivity ◽

Trait Variation ◽

Self And Other ◽

Self Reports ◽

Moral Disgust ◽

Sexual Disgust ◽

Moral Condemnation

A broad literature indicates that pathogen, sexual, and moral disgust sensitivity relate to, among other things, political attitudes, moral condemnation, and symptoms of psychopathology. As such, instruments measuring disgust sensitivity have been widely used across subfields of psychology. Yet, surprisingly little work has examined whether self-reports in disgust sensitivity reflect systematic trait variation. Here, we present the first study to examine self-other agreement in pathogen, sexual, and moral disgust sensitivity. Romantic partners (n1 = 290), friends (n2 = 212) and acquaintances (n3 = 140) rated each other on these three domains of disgust sensitivity and on the HEXACO personality dimensions. Correlations between dyad partners’ self- and other-ratings were calculated to estimate the magnitude of self-other agreement. We found self-other agreement in all domains of disgust sensitivity (r’s of .36, .46, and .66 for moral, pathogen, and sexual disgust sensitivity, respectively), with this agreement only slightly inferred from personality perceptions (percentages mediated by HEXACO were 15%, 7%, and 33% for pathogen, sexual, and moral disgust sensitivity, respectively). These results suggest that pathogen, sexual, and moral disgust sensitivity reflect systematic trait variation that is detectable by others and distinct from broader personality traits.

Download Full-text

Understanding what women want: eliciting preference for delivery health facility in a rural subcounty in Kenya, a discrete choice experiment

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038865 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (12) ◽

pp. e038865

Author(s):

Jackline Oluoch-Aridi ◽

Mary B Adam ◽

Francis Wafula ◽

Gilbert Kokwaro

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Care ◽

Health Facility ◽

Discrete Choice Experiment ◽

Discrete Choice ◽

Choice Experiment ◽

Home Delivery ◽

Process Indicator ◽

Opt Out ◽

Women’S Preferences

ObjectiveTo identify what women want in a delivery health facility and how they rank the attributes that influence the choice of a place of delivery.DesignA discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to elicit rural women’s preferences for choice of delivery health facility. Data were analysed using a conditional logit model to evaluate the relative importance of the selected attributes. A mixed multinomial model evaluated how interactions with sociodemographic variables influence the choice of the selected attributes.SettingSix health facilities in a rural subcounty.ParticipantsWomen aged 18–49 years who had delivered within 6 weeks.Primary outcomeThe DCE required women to select from hypothetical health facility A or B or opt-out alternative.ResultsA total of 474 participants were sampled, 466 participants completed the survey (response rate 98%). The attribute with the strongest association with health facility preference was having a kind and supportive healthcare worker (β=1.184, p<0.001), second availability of medical equipment and drug supplies (β=1.073, p<0.001) and third quality of clinical services (β=0.826, p<0.001). Distance, availability of referral services and costs were ranked fourth, fifth and sixth, respectively (β=0.457, p<0.001; β=0.266, p<0.001; and β=0.000018, p<0.001). The opt-out alternative ranked last suggesting a disutility for home delivery (β=−0.849, p<0.001).ConclusionThe most highly valued attribute was a process indicator of quality of care followed by technical indicators. Policymakers need to consider women’s preferences to inform strategies that are person centred and lead to improvements in quality of care during delivery.

Download Full-text

Women’s Preferences for Strong Men Under Perceived Harsh Versus Safe Ecological Conditions

Evolutionary Psychology ◽

10.1177/14747049211032351 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 19 (3) ◽

pp. 147470492110323

Author(s):

Ray Garza ◽

Farid Pazhoohi ◽

Jennifer Byrd-Craven

Keyword(s):

Ecological Factors ◽

Ecological Condition ◽

Sex Characteristics ◽

Ecological Conditions ◽

University Women ◽

Secondary Sex Characteristics ◽

Trade Offs ◽

Forced Choice Task ◽

Women’S Preferences ◽

Physical Features

Ecological conditions provide information about available resources for one’s environment. In humans, this has been shown to influence reproductive behavior, as individuals may engage in trade-offs between partner quality and investment. For instance, many women may trade-off preferences for men with physical features indicative of social dominance and health over physical features indicative of commitment and investment. The current study explored women’s preferences for formidable men under safe vs. harsh ecological conditions. Across three studies, U.S. university women ( N = 1,098) were randomly assigned to a perceived harsh or safe ecological condition. They were asked to rate the attractiveness of men’s body types (i.e., muscular vs. less muscular). Findings revealed that in general, women rated stronger men as more attractive than weaker men irrespective of the ecological condition. Evidence for preference as a function of ecology appeared only when a two-alternative forced-choice task was used (Study 3), but not in rating tasks (Studies 1 and 2). Study 3 showed that women had a relatively stronger preference for stronger men for short-term relationships in a resource scarce ecological condition. This research provides some evidence that perceived ecological conditions can drive women’s preferences for men with enhanced secondary sex characteristics as a function of mating context. These findings are consistent with previous research indicating the importance of physical characteristics in men’s attractiveness, and it adds to the existing literature on ecological factors and mating preferences.

Download Full-text

The Function of Casual Sex Action and Inaction Regret: A Longitudinal Investigation

Evolutionary Psychology ◽

10.1177/1474704921998333 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

pp. 147470492199833

Author(s):

Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair ◽

Trond Viggo Grøntvedt ◽

Mons Bendixen

Keyword(s):

Casual Sex ◽

Adaptive Function ◽

Short Term ◽

Behavioral Choices ◽

Sexual Disgust ◽

Sexual Regret ◽

Adaptive Shifts ◽

Sexual Strategies Theory

In several recent papers the sex difference in regret predicted by sexual strategies theory has been supported: men more than women report regret passing up short-term sexual opportunities (inaction regret), while women regret having had sexual encounters (action regret). However, the adaptive function of regret, to improve future behavioral choices, has not been tested. In this first longitudinal test of behavioral change following regret, we consider whether regret actually results in adaptive shifts of behavior: will men who regret passing up sex engage in more short-term sex following regret? Will women who regret short-term encounters either choose better quality partners, reduce number of one-night stands or shift their strategy to long-term relationships? Across two waves (NT1 = 399, 65.4% women and NT2 = 222, 66.2% women) students responded to questions about casual sex action regret and inaction regret, along with possible outcomes, intrapersonal traits, and concurrent contextual predictors. There was no clear evidence for the proposed functional shifts in sexual behavior. Casual sex regret was associated with respondent sex and stable individual differences, such as sociosexual attitudes, regret processing and metacognitions, but the effect of these predictors were not consistent across the two waves. Among the tested concurrent contextual predictors, sexual disgust was the most consistent across waves. Regret is considered a gauge of the value and quality of the short-term sexual encounter. However, tentatively we conclude that after this first test of function using longitudinal data, we find no evidence of a mating strategy shifting effect following sexual regret.

Download Full-text

What do women want? Valuing women’s preferences and estimating demand for alternative models of maternity care using a discrete choice experiment

Health Policy ◽

10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.09.013 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 121 (11) ◽

pp. 1154-1160 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Christopher G. Fawsitt ◽

Jane Bourke ◽

Richard A. Greene ◽

Brendan McElroy ◽

Nicolas Krucien ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Discrete Choice Experiment ◽

Discrete Choice ◽

Maternity Care ◽

Choice Experiment ◽

Alternative Models ◽

Women’S Preferences

Download Full-text

Non-Pregnant and Pregnant Women’s Femininity Preferences in Male Faces: Tests Based on Within- and Between-Sex Sexual Dimorphism Facial Manipulations

Archives of Sexual Behavior ◽

10.1007/s10508-020-01868-8 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Fangfang Wen ◽

Bin Zuo ◽

Yang Wang ◽

Shuhan Ma ◽

Shijie Song ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sexual Dimorphism ◽

Chinese Women ◽

Past Research ◽

Facial Stimulus ◽

Facial Cues ◽

Facial Masculinity ◽

Facial Stimuli ◽

Pregnancy Status ◽

Face Stimuli ◽

Women’S Preferences

AbstractPast research on women’s preferences for male facial masculinity in Western cultures has produced inconsistent results. Some inconsistency may be related to the use of different facial stimulus manipulations (e.g., between-sex sexual dimorphic facial manipulation or within-sex sexual dimorphic facial manipulation) that do not perfectly avoid non-facial cues, and pregnancy status may also influence women’s face preferences. We therefore recruited pregnant and nonpregnant Chinese women and manipulated the sexual dimorphism of male facial stimuli to explore the influences of manipulation methods, non-facial cues, and pregnancy status on face preferences. Results showed that: (1) in contrast with a general masculinity preference observed in Western cultures, both pregnant and nonpregnant Chinese women preferred feminized and neutral male faces generally; (2) pregnant women’s preference for feminized male faces was stable across manipulation methods, while nonpregnant women preferred feminized male faces except under between-sex sexual dimorphism manipulation; and (3) manipulation methods, rather than non-facial cues, influenced participants’ face preferences. Specifically, women showed the strongest preferences for femininity when face stimuli were manipulated by within-sex sexual dimorphic facial manipulation, followed by unmanipulated faces and between-sex sexual dimorphic facial manipulation. This effect was stronger for nonpregnant women in the unmanipulated condition and for pregnant women in the between-sex sexual dimorphic facial manipulation. This research provides empirical evidence of women’s preferences for sexual dimorphism in male faces in a non-Western culture, as well as the effects of facial manipulation methods, pregnancy status, and the interactions between these factors.

Download Full-text